Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC parking invoice - tesco Faraday retail park,Coatbank Street, Coatbridge. ML5 3SQ scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Which law requires you to 'see three pictures'? There is no requirement, only a courtesy - but all this is immaterial, UKPC cannot issue 'tickets' only invoces, which you are at liberty to pay or ignore as you wish. I suggest you do the latter.

 

However, as they do not have any other address other than the RK details (and perhaps you, if you wrote to them), they will pursue the RK, who will pay up regardless, and then bill your credit card/surety for the hire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you took the courtesy car, did you have to register your credit card with them and/or use your credit card to pay for your vehicle repair? If so, there may have been something in the small print saying you accept responsibility for "traffic offences and parking fines". Now, I know this isn't a real fine, but if the garage have access to your credit card details, they may well pay the scamvoice and charge it on to you through your CC claiming they thought it WAS a real parking fine.

 

In this case what I would do is notify your credit card company that you have lost your card and can they pleasse re-issue a new one. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a motability car, and the courtesy car was because my car was being serviced, they have none of my card details. Would I just be better off paying this one, as much as I hate to, and then remember for next time...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got a nice letter in the post this morning after UKPC decided to ignore my every letter to them re the McDonald's car park incident in Hull. Their chums at Debt Recovery Plus Ltd are trying to get me to believe that I now owe £153.75. (Just imagine all the dirty Big Macs I could have bought with that? Shame I'm not a fan of McDonald's food really.)

 

The letter from Debt Recovery Plus states: "As a member of the British Parking Association, (BPA) and its Approved Operators Scheme (AOS) we adhere to its code of practice." ..... strange? I didn't realise Debt Recovery Plus Ltd were members of the British Parking Association. (I refer you to this post I found VERY interesting ... http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-offences/137721-why-british-parking-association.html )

 

Anyway. They're just going to get a letter back from me saying that the alledged 'debt' is still in dispute and therefore they have no right to force this kind of action upon me. In hindsight I wish I'd have seen this forum before and ignored every letter, but when people (read: bailiffs, theives, take your pick) are threatening to break into your home and take posessions out of your home, the line has been crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't write to them. Just ignore. They'll send about 4 or 5 letters in total, each threatening you with CCJs and things. The price will go up, then with the last one, the price will drop back down in one last desperate bid to get you to pay. Then they'll stop...

 

If you keep writing to them, you'll only encourage them to send more letters and end up wasting money on stamps...

 

Ignore...

Link to post
Share on other sites

"and end up wasting money on stamps..." ?

 

On the [very] few occasions that I've sent letters to PPC's, I've never bothered with the formality of stamps!

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need help. My car was parked in Slough Trading Estate in the B&Q car Park and those wonderful people at UKPC gave me a ticket for a vehicle parked out of marked bay.

 

This is what I sent to UKPC appeals of which I have had to send it 4 times.

 

"1)There was a large old people home’s van parked next to me so in order for them to enter and disembark. I had to park outside of the bay.

 

2)The car park was quite empty which is why I thought nobody would complain and I had parked quite far away from the shops to not hinder or annoyance anyone.

 

I understand and realise that even though my car was parked outside of the marked bay, but please let us use some common sense, how are the OAP’s supposed to exit or enter the vehicle if my car is parked right next to them? My car was not in anyone’s way and I was only parked for about 20 minutes. I also understand that I could have parked elsewhere, as the car park was quite empty and with hindsight I suppose I should off.

 

As it is the first time that I have received a parking fine from you please could you authorise this appeal and see the reasons that I have provided. I am sure that you and your company are only trying to maintain parking and will see the common sense."

 

 

What else do you think I should do? I gave UKPC a ring today and they still did'nt recevice the appeals even though I sent it 4 times using their website.

 

 

Regards.

IMAG0218B.jpg

Edited by kwan88
Mising Info
Link to post
Share on other sites

I need help. My car was parked in Slough Trading Estate in the B&Q car Park and those wonderful people at UKPC gave me a ticket for a vehicle parked out of marked bay.

 

This is what I sent to UKPC appeals of which I have had to send it 4 times.

 

"1)There was a large old people home’s van parked next to me so in order for them to enter and disembark. I had to park outside of the bay.

 

I agree that it's unfair to charge you for parking outside a bay, but what about the many other parking spaces dotted around?

 

Sorry to sound like an old git (I'm 26), but it really grinds my gears when people park like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's no good to me, with hindsight I should n't went to B&Q. I should'nt off been polite and let OAP able to get back into the van.

 

BTW it grinds you because other people have better cars and park in that way to avoid there doors being hit. That grinds me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's no good to me, with hindsight I should n't went to B&Q. I should'nt off been polite and let OAP able to get back into the van.

 

BTW it grinds you because other people have better cars and park in that way to avoid there doors being hit. That grinds me.

 

Your logic is askew, surely if that were your reasoning you'd have parked in one of the many spaces far away from the OAP bus and entirely avoid the prospect of being hit.

 

I'm simply playing devil's advocate, as I said I don't agree with you being charged for it, I just think it's very inconsiderate whether the car park is empty or not. If it fills up while you're in there you're denying another person a parking space because you simply didn't want to bother parking correctly in the first place, and that's why it grinds my gears. I'd dispense with the ad hominems if you really seek to justify it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a [problem] invoice you dont owe them anything , take time to read about this [causing problems] parking bully boys, the online advice is IGNORE and keep your dosh

 

you will see how the [problem] works and its simple to beat them just ignore their stupid 4 - 8 letters they send claiming what they MAY do

 

stop talking to them or contacting them the APPEAL does not exist , they want to [problem] you for the dosh

 

and remember regardless of what others want to say about parking and other people etc etc , its a [problem] IT IS NOT A REAL PARKING TICKET in the first place

Edited by kiptower

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kwan88 - it is not a fine. As has already been said, from now on ignore all correspondence.

 

Having said that, I can't help feeling that when you say that you parked across two bays to help old people leave the bus is an attempt to justify thoughtless, and lazy, parking.

After all you could have parked in the bay behind you, or to your left, or even in the row in front.

 

However we are not here to judge, but to give advice - and that is to never correspond with a PPC, ignore their communications, and perhaps in the future try and avoid ttracting the attentions of a parking attendent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kwan,

 

You are taking them too seriously, You are completely wasting YOUR time and Money with an appeal, I'll tell you the result of your appeal right now, 'Appeal rejected'.

You do realise that you are dealing with a [problem], don't you?

Ignore them completely you are giving them the credibility they crave.

STOP CONTACTING THEM.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While the advice will always be to ignore the PPC and never reply to their scamvoices, seeing as you have gone to the trouble of uploading the pic of your car, you are also going to invite comments about the abismal state of your parking, as by anyones standards, it's pretty cr*p!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading this forum you all gave me the strength to fight these corrupt con men after a parking ticket was placed on my car for a £90 fine, but of course if i had paid it within 14 days they would reduce it to £50, how kind !! I have as advised by this forum sent off a letter (recorded) to ukpc to let them know i am not going to pay. Watch this space. :D

cnv00002.jpg

Edited by notgettingmymoney
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...