
chinoky
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Content Count
61 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
3 NeutralAbout chinoky
-
Rank
Basic Account Holder
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Hello all, I have started a draft defence. I tried to keep it simple and after much editing, i've ended up with this. Any suggestions would be warmly appreciated. 1. The registered keeper was not the driver on the dates provided by the claimant. 2. It is denied that the registered keeper parked at Chandlers Avenue, Barge Walk, Greenwich Peninsula SE10 0PE at the times mentioned in the Particulars. 3. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all."
-
Afternoon all. Today I received the response back from their legal team. I'm not sure what to make of it. Response: We write further to your request pursuant to for CPR31.14 dated *****. CPR 31.14 (1) (a) allows a party to inspect a document mentioned in the statement of case However, nowhere in the claimants PoC are the documents listed in your email mentioned. Accordingly, the provisions of CPR 31.14 do not apply, and you are not entitled to inspect the document requested. Should you be insured of your legal position, yo
-
Good morning all, Thank you all for your replies. It is very helpful. The driver wasn't me that day and I am the keeper. I have been spending a lot of time reading through other people's thread regarding county claim forms and trying to get familiar with the process. When i receive a response from the CPR31:14 letter i sent. Will it have all the chain of events leading up to the claim form?
-
Thank you for your reply admin. Win or lose I wanted to contribute towards this site. I've been stuck in some horrible sticky situations in the past. When i had no where to turn to for advice, this site has always helped me pull through. I will fight this claim. If i don't win, i will settle by instalments. It seems to me they added one of the PCN twice to get it over the £600 mark. What a awful thing to do for profit.
-
I just phoned Greenwich London Borough council. They confirmed the Greenwich Peninsula is NOT owned by Port of London Authority and it is within their borders. I also tried calling the Port of London Authority to confirm but this went straight to answer machine after the switch board transferred me over. i have uploaded the PDF again. Please check this one. Thanks IMG-20201110-WA0023.pdf
-
Afternoon all, I just got home from the area and took some photos. Its a bit of a trek. I stopped on the main road and quickly took photos as there were CCTV everywhere and didn't want to stop in the bays. Just to confirm, we have had no contact whatsoever with the car park management or their legal team. Never responded at all. I will read through some threads and hopefully get an idea on how to start a draft defence. Thank you all. This stress has been immense. It feels nice knowing i have people on my side. IMG-20201110-WA0022.pdf
-
Good morning everyone, I've scanned the front page of the claim form and crossed off the password. I will go there today and take pictures of the signs and streets. It is a pay and display street, my partner told me a car park but she meant parking bay. I think the original fine was £100 which is reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days but will confirm later today. Thank you everyone. IMG-20201110-WA0002.pdf