Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • whitelist your comment isn't very helpful. Advising people to get advice from two different places is possibly the worst advice you can give in a situation like this.
    • Ok I'm up to speed. I really need to know when your court date is, that is very important. I also need to see a copy of your transfer notice which allocated it to your local county court please.
    • Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review the documents. I apologize for any confusion and for not providing a complete story earlier. Let me address your questions and provide a clearer chronology of events: • Purchase Date from Amazon Germany: June 12, 2020 • Item Failure Date: May 2022 • Notification to Amazon within Warranty Period: June 2022 • Return Arrangements to Amazon: The agent from Amazon emailed me the request to send the item back. • Issues with Warranty Period: When I raised the issue of the lost parcel with Amazon, they mentioned being out of the warranty period, even though they had previously initiated the return process. It seems the date had passed, but that wasn’t the case. I initiated the return within the warranty period (before June 12, 2022), but the return hadn’t generated a label (it needed to be sent abroad). So, I contacted Amazon, and they instructed me about the process on June 26—handling everything myself and the cost to be reimbursed later. • Choice of Interparcel: Interparcel was one of the few couriers/brokers that would ship the item to Slovakia. • Involvement of parcel2go: I used "The Evri International" service, which is operated by Parcel2go.com Limited (company number 02591405) under the Evri brand. This led me to decide to go after them. I realize the importance of answering the questions and apologize for any oversight. Here are the additional details and clarifications: • Witness Statement and Court Bundle: I haven't prepared these, as I wasn’t aware they were needed. • Mediation: I did attend mediation; however, Parcel2go rejected all my claims. I understand the gravity of possibly having to abandon the current case and pursue Interparcel or Evri directly. Your advice is invaluable, and I will provide any further information required to help assess the situation and determine the best course of action. Thank you again for your assistance.
    • Did as advised no ccj at all is showing up also paid for trust online just to make sure and nothing there either Thanks everyone for help and advice  It is much appreciated xx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

gpm vs HSBC bank - Their Defence Struck Out


GPM
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This is my first post, but I've submitted a MCOL on behalf of my husband for nearly £5000. I've also submitted the AQ and the court now advises HSBC's defence has been struck out, as they did not submit theirs by the due date of 1 Jan. It has also come back from the judge (assumably this means the decision has now been made as to which track will apply). Can anyone tell me what it means for their defence to be struck out, and what will happen next?

******************

HSBC £4,528

Began process with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on 5/7/06

Recieved payment on 21/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Great! Thanks for your replies. I'll let you know what the court advises.

******************

HSBC £4,528

Began process with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on 5/7/06

Recieved payment on 21/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Netty - it's been a long time coming! I sent the first letter requesting all statements back in July last year. Once this one is finished I will have the confidence to take on all the other companies that have charged penalties.

******************

HSBC £4,528

Began process with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on 5/7/06

Recieved payment on 21/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

just ring that court first thing in the morning and get it sorted. can't wait to hear your reply tomorrow when you have found out!!!

everything is crossed for you

netty

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will post an update as soon as I can tomorrow. Thanks so much. It's amazing how much support everyone gives on this site! But then, it's such a good cause!

******************

HSBC £4,528

Began process with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on 5/7/06

Recieved payment on 21/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Any news??

 

C

[FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=4][COLOR=magenta]C [COLOR=black]& [/COLOR][COLOR=blue]D :) [/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [COLOR=black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=mediumturquoise][B]HSBC[/B][COLOR=#000000]- Full settlement received & spent! £1,477.93 :-) [/COLOR][/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=mediumturquoise][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=mediumturquoise][B]HSBC claim 2![/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] - Full settlement offer received 27/06 - £1,116 :) [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=mediumturquoise][B]A&L[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] (for my Nan) - full settlement received on day of prelim hearing - approx £1500 :-)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=mediumturquoise][B]Halifax[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] - (for a friend) - full settlement received 30/06 - £2576! :) [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=mediumturquoise][B]Barclays[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] - (for a friend) - Court forms were due to be submitted but he wants to wait for results of the court case with OFT[/COLOR][/FONT] [/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=#000000][B][COLOR=mediumturquoise]A&L[/COLOR][/B] - (for a friend) - court forms submitted - claim 'stayed' due to OFT case[/COLOR][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit FUBAR for those caught in the backlog.

 

Still if they did not insist on playing games with us and paid up as the moral guardians they claim to be would then they would not be in this situation.

 

Stick em I hope they lose the lot.

4th January 2008 - Prelim sent

16th January 2008 - Standard reply - NO!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No news as yet, unfortunately. When my husband rang the court on Friday, the person he spoke to didn't seem to know what was what, so we may need to wait a couple of days to see if we receive anything official from them in writing advising of the situation. If not, we'll try phoning again to see if we can get any more information.

******************

HSBC £4,528

Began process with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on 5/7/06

Recieved payment on 21/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry to keep you all waiting in suspense! Just got back online after some problems with my internet connection.

 

Phoned the court on Friday who advised the paperwork has come back from the judge but they are too short-staffed to process it. So we now have to wait for 2 weeks to receive the paperwork advising us what to do next.

 

They confirmed again that HSBC's defence has been struck out, so can anyone tell me if I can go ahead and request a judgement by default before receiving the official paperwork from them? And how would I go about this. I'm concerned that there will be a deadline, and also, we just would rather not wait another 2 weeks before progressing the case. We want our money back!

******************

HSBC £4,528

Began process with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on 5/7/06

Recieved payment on 21/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you first come on to cag - before you click on the forum - scroll down to the very bottom - and those names in pink and green are mods and site helpers - you can see who is on-line - they should be able to give you a decent opinion of what to do - include your link and ask them to look at the last couple of posts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you must enter a Judgement in Default as the defence has been struck out. To enter Judgment in Default you will need to obtain a Form from the court, this is known as a "Request for Judgment" Form.

 

The form you need is an N225, here http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/HMCSCourtFinder/GetForm.do?court_forms_id=465

 

Complete this and file it with the court where you filed your claim.

  • Haha 1

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may well be embarrassed into paying once judgment has been granted. The court will send an N30 [Judgment for Claimant (in default)] and when you receive this judgment has been granted.

 

This can then be enforced, by issuing a warrant of execution. In order to do this you will need to file an Form N323 (request to issue a warrant of execution) but let us not get ahead of ourselves, this may not be necessary.

 

File the N225 as soon as you can and obtain the judgment first.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...