Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accused of shoplifting - shop manager contacted employer offering his CCTV and i might get sacked - is this even legal under GDPR!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

this morning I received a called from my headteacher asking me to go to a meeting and asked me to not go back to the classroom.

The manager of the local shop savers said he saw me on cctv taking an eyeliner and months ago placing an empty box.

I didnt take the eyeliners I was holding multiple things but they were left in the shop. I didnt take them,

he instead of detaining me or calling the police saw my lanyard and called my headteacher. Not the police, my headteacher

I'm suspended under investigation till my school decide my fate.

I went back to look at the CCTV to show them I placed them back and they denied it.

I also offered to pay and they don't even know what I supposedly took.

I can't pay for something  i dont have.

Can anyone help?

Was the manager's procedure right? What can I expect?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Accused from shoplifting - manager contacted my employer using my personal details in my lanyard

he should not have done that, it's against GDPR rules im sure and p'haps many privacy and legal rules. he is not a judge nor a court.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also he and my headteacher told me that the manager was going to show the CCTV to my headteacher. I want to know if that's legal. 

I ended in hospital today because of a panic attack I had my appraisal last week and I was the best teacher assistant last term. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do NOT offer to pay the shop. If you took nothing you owe the shop nothing. Offering to pay will make the shop and your school assume you did take the item(s). Because why would an innocent person offer to pay?

Are you in a union? If so call them for advice immediately.

What is your role in school? Teacher? TA?

There are two issues here.

1. Was the shop manager entitled to tell the headteacher what he did? Did the shop manager send the CCTV footage to the headteacher? If he didn't how does the school know the shop is referring to you?

2. Was the headteacher entitled to suspend you?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a teacher assistant.

The guy saw my id hanging from my neck and decided to call her instead of detaining me or calling the police.

Headteacher said she was going to go and take a look at the CCTV. 

I haven't done anything wrong. I'm absolutely devastated

Link to post
Share on other sites

well when they look at the CCTV they will ese you did nothing wrong

 

DO NOT OFFER TO PAY - it just makes you look guilty.

If they come back and say u didnt place it, then you ask for a copy of that CCTV and IMHO you sue the company and the school although a colleague may tell me I'm a bit too harsh there.

But if that was me, and I got fired over it, that would be a court claim for both of them. Unfair dimissal for one, GDPR for two, and also and a colleague may once again correct me here but I think you can sue the shop for loss of earnings because they've lied which has made you lose out on earnings. Not sure what law this is under but DEFINITELY sounds like a viable claim to me,

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep totally agree. sue the **** off them if anything happens.

pers i would be telling the headmistress she is on extremely dodgy legal grounds here , the CCTV is your personal data and the shop manager has ZERO legal rights to show it to her and she has ZERO legal rights to view it. refuse your permission for her to view it.

the shop manager legally has no business at ALL in contacting your employer either what a CAD. 

OUT OF ORDER.

pers id take him to court and sue regardless to what happens under GDPR rules.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Accused of shoplifting - shop manager contacted employer offering his CCTV and i might get sacked - is this even legal under GDPR!!

thread title updated

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I also just add to the comments already.

1. What the shop has done with the CCTV is a clear Breach of the Data Protection Act as they had no right to inform nor show that CCTV to anyone in your school/employer as it is absolutely nothing to do with your employer. report the shops actions to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO). In fact ask the shop for there ICO Registration Number

 
ICO.ORG.UK

Find out what to do next if you’ve had a problem accessing your personal information from an organisation, or if you’re unhappy about how an organisation has handled yours or other people's information. You should...

2. As above this is nothing to do with your Employer but to do with that Shop Only.

3. IMO I also would be reporting that shops actions to the Police as is that shop suspected theft then it is the Police they should have went to not your employer so report this incident to the Police and get a Crime Reference off them.

4. DO NOT offer to pay for anything as you took nothing from that shop.

5. Sue the hell out of that shop and the staff member that has done this they need to be taught a lesson on how not to use CCTV and approach someone's employer.

 

I think you need to inform your Employer that you refuse for them to look at that shops CCTV for the simple reason they are not the Police and also have No right under Data Protection Act 2018 to do so and that you wish the Police to be involved in this matter for them to view the CCTV as the shop approaching you my Employer about this CCTV is also a Breach of the Data Protection Act

In your scenario here the only people outside that shop that have a Legal Right to view that CCTV are the Police Only NOT your Employer.

Next I feel you need to make a Formal Complaint to the CEO of Savers about this specific shops actions and how you feel about it and do not hold back about how you feel and make sure to be clear you took nothing with what is claimed.

1. The shop had no right approaching your employer and offering them to view the CCTV

2. The above actions with the CCTV is a clear Breach of the Data Protection Act 2018.

3. I had nothing to do with this supposed theft which if it was then your store should have clearly involved the Police rather than go direct to someone's employers as they are not the Police nor the Courts and I will fully defend myself in this matter.

4. Due to your stores action I have been suspended by my Employer until they view the CCTV which if they do is another clear breach of the Data Protection Action 2018 as the only people outside this store that can legally view that CCTV Footage is the Police

5. Your stores action are in Breach of the Data Protection Action 2018, by approaching my Employer and my Employers action due to this is defamation caused by your store.

6. Why has this store to date not involved the Police if this is a claim of theft?

7. I require to be provided with a copy of this CCTV Footage and for it NOT to be deleted and it must be stored and I require confirmation of this.

8. I require to be provided with the CCTV Policy for that specific store

9. I require the ICO Registration Number for that specific store.

10. I require to be provided with a copy of your Company Data Protection Act Policy

11. I require the full name of the Manager of that specific store

12. I should remind you of the Vento bands in force which I will use due to the above

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Vento-bands-presidential-guidance-April-2023-addendum.pdf

 

Head Office

Savers Health and Beauty Ltd, Hutchison House, 5 Hester Road, Battersea, London, SW11 4AN

Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Doug Winchester

Email:  [email protected]

You now want a good paper trail of all of this as your own evidence

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you tell us the name of the shop. If you prefer not to do that on the open forum then please could you email it to us in confidence at our admin email address.

Is this a privately owned shop or is it part of a chain?

If it is part of a chain then you should start off by sending them a subject access request.

If it is a privately owned shop then you should still send them a subject access request but things may be a bit more difficult as the owner of the shop may well want to come out completely and support all the manager.

Shoplifting is a major problem for these retail outlets at the moment and so to a certain extent one can understand the reaction. However on the basis of what you say, the action of the management was extreme and also unlawful.

Hot certainly would be careful about the way that you deal with your head teacher. You need to do everything you can to bring them onside and not deal with him in any conflictual way.

Please let us have details of the shop either on the open forum or by email

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Savers.

I just messaged my headteacher about the irregularities in her investigation just because I need her to understand that the actions of the manager were malicious and she's only doing this investigation because of his illegal actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, no I'm not in an Union.

My headteacher kept telling she was going to take a decision after seeing the CCTV now I don't know even if she has the right to watch and to decided after it because it would be an unlawful act. 

The manager saw my name from my lanyard while paying and he decided to call my headteacher to make a complaint.

Next day headteacher told me the allegations and sent me back home while investigating.

I must say I was never detained in the shop, I never gave them my data and I wasn't banned from the shop.

I don't even understand how my headteacher can do this just from a private phone call. 

Police weren't involved at any point

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a subject access request and also please answer the question put for my the site team colleague about Union membership

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have all the actions (meetings, suspension and "conversations") taken by the school been done correctly, in line with their disciplinary policy?

Have all meetings had a note taker?

You may well need a paper trail further down the line...

Tagging @Emmzzi for any possible advice in this regard...

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, just one meeting with the school.

Nobody was taking notes, they only gave me their procedures code and thats all.

Interaction had been by phone and email.

I was notified that my suspension yesterday wasn't a disciplinary action and they asked to not go to work on Monday because they need to keep investigating. I haven't signed anything, haven't been handed a suspension notice.. NOTHING.

In the school week view I'm only out on Monday - I don't really understand what's happening. 

Yesterday I had a mental breakdown and the headteacher tried to contact my husband to check over me.

I wasn't happy with her manners to deal with this and her desire to see the CCTV because she has years of experience, she must know she can't legally request to see a third party cctv. 

I don't even know why she took seriously the call from the manager. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite honestly i'd copy and paste stu007's whole post above into an email to the headmistress.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, makkyinuk said:

they only gave me their procedures code and thats all.

And have they actually followed their procedures... To the letter?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk I did it at 7 am today step by step and explaining the unlawful of her actions and the shop manager ones. I know she has the right to investigate but that stupid idea of feeling a criminal detective its absolutely absurd. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

i think you'll find things will swiftly change very very soon!!:pound:

she will be very worried by that. and know she doesn't have a leg to stand on.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Nicky Boy said:

And have they actually followed their procedures... To the letter?

I think they are trying to. But I hope her investigations ended after she notices she doesn't have a any legal power to judge me because of rumours. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If - and it's only an if at this stage - it's not all cut and dried with work in the future, you need protection in that regard too.

You were asked whether you were in a union. You gave a wrong answer! Join now: if this goes to a tribunal later, they will know exactly what to do, both legally and administratively, and have entire departments working on your side. And bearing in mind the school will presumably be in breach of its statutory obligations (GDPR, duty of care etc.) they'd happily take it.

They also know exactly what it is that the HT should/shouldn't have done, and probably better than her! But join now before it becomes official.

Hopefully, it won't, of course, but some are leery about representing members who join after the event.

Edited by Grotesque
decode
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Still trying to find out if you have sent or if you are planning to send the subject access request.

This should be sent to the head office of savers. It should be done immediately together with some identity documents such as a utilities bill.

Really is essential and it would be very helpful if you would acknowledge this suggestion which has been made twice previously

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...