Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I received this pack yesterday its an application notice to change claimants. Will they be chasing me for this as they were successful with the first claim? many thanks Webb 1.Application Notice N244rd.pdf 2.Asset Transfer Deed r.pdf 3.Notice of Assignment Part A Letter 1 & 2rd.pdf 5.Claim Form rd.pdf 6.Draft Order rd.pdf
    • Hi, If they haven't followed the court's directions there will be little tolerance of the court. Anyway please can you upload a copy of the court paperwork
    • Yes, you should have applied for an immediate strike out as soon as the deadline expired. Without the agreement, they are stuffed Forget Barclaycard, Asset link is now the creditor, and it is down to them to provide the agreement.  That needs to go into the witness statement. They have not provided the agreement contrary to directions of the court and request the court strike out the claim as to the original court directions.
    • I did not receive a notice via post but in my claim status it shows my claim was transferred to a court I requested in my DQ, as it is closer to me.    Defense I filed:  1.       The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2.       The defendant paid the lead tenant a fixed sum monthly bill without fail for the extent of the rental period of the accommodation their contract was associated with who was responsible to make payments to the claimant, ending in June 2023. 3.       After moving out, a month later, the claimant wrote to state that an outstanding sum existed. Further stating, as one of the 10 tenants at the time, I now owed them the full sum instead of my 1/10 proportion of said debt, as 10 students were at the dwelling. They also intimated that they were legally allowed to charge me the full sum if the other renters were not to pay their share under some equal and joint severity rule. 4.       Despite sending numerous requests prior to the court claim being raised for copies of said bills for said utilities covered by the agreement, the claimant failed to send any clear bills. This included a CPR 31.14 on xx/xx/xxxx sent via post. 5.       The defendants stress that they acted in good faith to settle the outstanding balance, as evidenced by the confirmation received from the claimant.  Any subsequent demands for additional payments are unwarranted and contradict the claimant's previous acknowledgment of settlement. 6.       Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by Co-operative Energy and are therefore prevented from charging. With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: - a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement. b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed. c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. 7.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation                  that the money is owed. 8.It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deceased Parent Nov 2021 - Electricity was switched off, but still got charged £70PCM!!Mums Flat. ***Resolved with EON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 493 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

My mother died in November 2021

 

when I contacted her supplier she was in credit to the tune of three hundred pounds, following her death, I switched off all her appliances and the fuse box but somehow her bill was around seventy pounds per month.

 

I queried this and was fobbed off,

then raised a complaint in July stating that I wanted an explanation as to why the electric was being charged when it should not be even being used. She was in an over sixties flat with separate meters in a cupboard some two stories from her property

 

her fellow residents have advised me that my mum is not the first to have had bills for empty flats and others have complained.

 

So far the provider has written off the debt and the standing charge but I have just confirmed that following my complaint the meter reading has now magically not changed.

 

Any ideas as to what I can do next as I do not think bar the standing charge that I should have been deducted the credit let alone end up owing money. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seen a similar issue with a late relatives flat.

 

They had communal lighting linked to their meter, so they had been paying for external lights, for the benefit of other residents. 

 

Flats are known to have meter wiring issues due to the developers electricians incorrectly connecting wires to the wrong meter.

 

That is one explanation.  Another is that wrong meter readings have been provded due to wrong meter being read.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you take meter readings yourself after your mother's death when you turnd everything off?  Are meter readings obtained directly by the supplier through a smart meter or does it depend on you submitting readings to them?

 

Did your mother own the flat? What are you doing with it now, selling it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on current ownership, an electrician could verify whether there are wires connected registering usage that has nothing to do with the flat.

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the type of meter I'd go further and say you can do a preliminary check without needing an electrican. If the meter is like the ones I've always had it has a disc that spins as electricity is used - the more electricity that's being used the faster it spins. But if no electricity at all is being used by anything connected through that meter the disc should be completley stationary, not moving at all.

 

So if you still have access to the flat and to the meter then you can check it yourself. Make sure everything in the flat is turned off, as you have done, then look at the meter and check if the disc is moving.

 

If it is moving it's likely something other than the flat is wired to it.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Deceased Parent Nov 2021 - Electricity was switched off, but still got charged £70PCM!!Mums Flat

time for an SAR me thinks?

though i cant see how she got charged anything if the meter read has not moved since you turned the breakers off?

 

something id weird here.

 

who's the provider??

 

so you are after the £300 credit back from time of death, poss minus a small daily standing charge?

 

dx


 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx - the reading on the meter did move with all the appliances switched off as I did not switch off the fuse box as we were trying to sell the property so wanted lights and sockets so we could clean it.  I thought the initial bills from the provider was due to this activity plus letting a family member stay for a month while mum was in hospital and then until her funeral.

 

I only took a few readings initially in response to receiving an astronomical estimated bill. It was only when these showed a monthly bill of seventy pounds roughly when the flat was empty that I began to query what was going on.

 

I only realised the charge was ridiculous after a few months had passed, as I was working six days a week, dealing with probate, insurances and all that a death entails. When I raised my initial query in March 2022 the provider wrote to me and said they could not deal with me until letter of administration was sent in. This despite them having moved account into my name as executor. Getting the admin letter took nearly seven months from mums death as there had to be an inquest into why mum died, 

 

From March until June the bill was being eaten away and I could not provide meter readings as provider closed my online access and refused to speak to me.

 

Once the register had approved probate I sent letter in with a complaint, with the loa, but was fobbed off again, sent another letter in threatening public humiliation to them.  got a reply saying will credit account down to zero but nothing about the credit amount and could I please send readings per month which I have just done.

 

What annoys me is the twists and turns the provider has made to prevent me from dealing with this and the fact that now following my last complaint the meter seems to be magically working as it is not recording any electricity consumption which would be right given the fact I ended up switching not only the electric off via sockets etc but also the main fuse box.

 

I do not have a problem paying standing charge as we all have to. My problem is where has all the other charges come from, which the provider seems unwilling to explain or confirm.

 

I would like the credit back but not sure what to do next other than follow up on the complaint and say breakers off - no movement on meter,  breakers on - electric consumed despite flat being empty and no one in it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how is heat provided and how is hot water heated?

 

you have a digital meter so it should be quite easy to atleast find the circuit that is taking the power.

 

most digital meters should have a green or red flashing light indication when power is being drawn, sometimes says 100 by it, sometimes 1000.

or you might have a far right digit that increments.

 

turn the mains income breaker on and pop along the other breakers till you identify the circuit drawing current. by watching the light/digit. breakers will be labelled like lights, sockets, cooker etc .

 

might be an idea to do a bit of investigation yourself then you are one up on the provider who is?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just a quick thank you to all those people who helped me with this on here,

 

was resolved with Eon refunding the majority of the charges to me minus the standing charge,

 

never admitted an error but still backed down, probably cheaper to settle with me as an individual than the whole block of flats, 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Deceased Parent Nov 2021 - Electricity was switched off, but still got charged £70PCM!!Mums Flat. **RESOLVED BY EON**
  • AndyOrch changed the title to Deceased Parent Nov 2021 - Electricity was switched off, but still got charged £70PCM!!Mums Flat. ***Resolved with EON***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...