Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New Tenants since Late 2021- Seeking advice / steer on how to sensitively approach tenants before issuing 'Notice to quit' issue


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am respectfully seeking advice from Members please.

 

I need to give tenants the required 4-months Notice so that I can move back into my house at the end of July 2022.  The tenants are a family of four who have been extremely good and have looked after the property exceptionally well.

(i) However, they have also erected/built a very beautiful cottage within the grounds of the property without my consent, and contrary to the terms of the tenancy agreement.

(ii) In doing so, they removed top soil from the garden which taken off the property (I have photographic evidence).

(iii) I would not mind buying the cottage from the tenants if they will offer it at a price I can afford.

 

With regards to approaching the tenants on the issue of Notice to quit, I expect some back clash based purely on the work they have put in in maintaining the property and the nature of their personality.  I need to be cautions and sensitive. 

 

(a) I wondered if any members have had any experience in dealing with sensitive situations where there is a risk of volatility - if so, would you kindly share a suggested approach please?

(b) Also, is it still the case that 4-months Notice is mandatory as was set by Government back in 2020?

 

I would be grateful for any guidance, steer or advice please.  I am a novice and reluctant landlord so, please excuse any seemingly obvious solutions. 

 

I hope you can help and I look forward to hearing from you.

 

With thanks.

 

Maketa79

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very unusual situation, that you have a property with enough ground, for a tenant to build a cottage.

 

Given the peculiar position you have found yourself in, you have no choice really but to hire a Solicitors to deal with this for you.

 

Think about this a bit more. How have they connected services for their cottage ?  Water, sewerage, electricity, gas etc.

 

You have a building on your land without planning permission. As the owner of the land, you could find yourself liable for all the costs related to this building without consent.

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

Old and New threads merged

Hello Consumer Action Group Administration Team

 

I thank you for this Forum and for facilitating connections with Members who provided invaluable advice without which I would have not made the progress I have made with the management of of my tenancy agreement.  I have also learnt a great deal from my interactions with Members on this Forum.  I might have had the odd disagreement with one or two members but that is because I felt I was being censored.

 

My present query concerns the merging of my thread with a previous thread which is unrelated to my current query as the two situations are different and involve different tenants.  I am concerned that by bringing the two threads together, this might create the impression that the previous query has remained unresolved and as such the situation becomes rather confusing to the reader, and I might not get the help  that I am seeking from Members.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it the same property ?

 

If it is the same property, then why not add a clarificatiion post providing a history i.e.  when the tenancy changed, what type of tenancy agreement, when it started etc.

 

As I said earlier, your circumstances are very very unusual.  How many landlords rent a property to tenants and then find out they have built a cottage in the grounds ?

 

Do you think any online forum could provide any useful advice when the position you have outlined is so complicated ? 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both honeybee13 and unclebulgaria67.  To clarify, I comment as follows:

(i) this is the same property as in a previous thread.  However, in my opinion, the fact that it is the same property is immaterial and irrelevant in the context of the present query. To what extent does the 'property' play a part in the issues that I have highlighted?  My objective is to de-escalate the situation and achieve an amicable termination of the tenancy agreement. 

 

(ii) I am not dealing with the same tenants and no where have I confirmed this.  So merging threads of two unrelated issues seems to me rather illogical and would likely confuse a Member who might be trying to provide some advice or steer.

 

(iii) no where have I suggested or implied that Members are picking on me, the thought never crossed my mind.  After all, it is me who is seeking help and I am grateful that a Member has taken the time and trouble to read my post, and it is a bonus if they take the time and trouble to reply and offer some advice.  So where am I getting bogged down, honeybee13?  

 

(iv) in my opinion, it would be illogical and confusing to bring in to play a historical and irrelevant query which has no bearing on the present circumstances.  Why would I provide a history and add to an event which is no longer of relevance?

 

I would be grateful if you could please reconsider your line of thinking and some of the assumptions you made.  I agree the issues are complicated, that is why I've resorted to seeking advice from Members with a view to finding a way or an approach to de-escalate the situation as well as achieve an amicable solution.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that in the last year you have let your property to new tenants, and that in that time those new tenants have built a cottage on the property, without you either (1) knowing about it or (2) if you knew, doing anything about it? The tenants must have spent a few tens of thousands doing this? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused and this is where an update would have helped.

 

The way I read this is that since last July [2021], the tenants you wanted to leave went, new tenants moved in and have already built something in the garden?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Maketa79

 

Have split the threads again.

 

Think you will have to spend the money in hiring a Solicitors to deal with this for you.

 

You are out of your depth with this, which is hardly surprising given what you have told us. 

 

This is a situation where trying to get free information from the internet is not appropriate.

 

The tenants have built a cottage on your land and you may have difficulty removing them.  Given that you have not sold the land to the tenants and have not been involved with what they have done,  I suspect no planning consent was obtained and the cottage may have to be demolised, if restrospective plannig permission is not granted.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to New Tenants since Late 2021- Seeking advice / steer on how to sensitively approach tenants before issuing 'Notice to quit' issue

Hi Maketa79

 

You have 2 issues here that I see from reading your thread

 

1. You want advice on how to evict your Tenants amicably.

 

This we can advise you on the process but on how to do this amicably with your Tenants is difficult for us to advise on as you are the one that knows your Tenants not CAG so you would really need to think of the best approach as you will still have to serve Notice to Quit to them as required which you are aware of.

 

2. Cottage built on your Land. (could you clarify that this is an actual Cottage with the relevant amenities i.e. electricity/sewage etc and not just a Shed?)

 

If this is a Cottage that has been built without your permission it not only Breaches your Tenancy Agreement but may also be in Breach of the required Planning Permissions in you Local Authority area which as you are the Landlord if Planning Permission was required the Local Authority could take action against you.

 

You need to consider the above and remember even after your tenants have left if the Cottage requires planning permission do you apply for it with the Local Authority and what if it is not granted and you have to demolish the Cottage and put the land back to its previous state what are the costs involved going to be and will you be able to recover those costs from those Tenants.

 

I do agree that you may have to seek Legal Advice on this one especially with the Cottage built without your consent on your land by these Tenants in breach of the Tenancy Agreement. 

 

Some questions:

 

When did the Tenancy Start?

 

What type of Tenancy Agreement do they have?

 

With the Notice to Quit you are going to serve which Grounds are you going to use?

 

If they paid a Deposit is it secured in a Tenancy Deposit Scheme?

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello stu007 - thank you and thank you for your objective analysis and subsequent questions.  I'm genuinely grateful to you for taking the trouble / time to read my post. 

1. Yes - I was seeking some steer / pointers on how I might terminate the tenancy amicably.  The cottage or shed - would be something I need to look into in terms of definition but the construction is pretty solid and professionally done, the gentleman is clearly talented and he has built an admirable structure, complete with an outdoor jacuzzi.

2. Yes, you're right - I do not expect Members to know the tenant who I know to think the worst of any situation and needs to be approached with some sensitivity - he is the type that will not entertain an opposing viewpoint.  But he is a first class citizen and tenant. I hope that is not too much of a contradiction but I'm alluding to sensitivities.

3. Yes, there is electrics and plumbing in the cottage / shed (it's constructed of wooden panels).

4. Yes - I can see the legal implications and potential for costs incurred if the structure is demolished etc.

5. Yes - I'm aware of planning permission though I have not yet checked to see if the size of the structure falls within the required criteria, I need to check this - thank you.

6. The tenancy started in December 2018.

7. It's an Assured shorthold tenancy Agreement which is now on a periodic basis.

8. I wanted to serve Notice to quit based on a non-contentious route; I genuinely need to move back to my house.

9. Deposit is paid and secured through a regulated agency

 

As a final point, I have always strived to have a healthy working relationship with the tenants.

 

I hope the above clarifies the points you have raised.  Thank you once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You are more than welcome for the advice.

 

It's really how you best approach your Tenants to serve the Notice to Quit and there will really be no easy way of doing this as a Notice to Quit is exactly that it's how the Tenants will take it and hopefully not cause any issues.

 

As for the Cottage/Shed I think you need to urgently check it is within Planning Permission.

 

Also with the above the Utilities fitted within it are safe as well. It's because you are aware of this (as the Landlord) you need to air on caution to protect yourself  i.e. what if it had faulty electrics and electrocuted someone or caused a fire (has an electrical inspection been carried out? where are the electrics coming from/to this Cottage/Shed) same for the water you don't know if these were done by a competent professional.

 

IMO that structure needs to urgently be inspected as it has been illegally built on your land and due to the utilities fitted bear in mind the required safety inspections you as a Landlord are required to carry out to your Property the Tenants Rents as a Legal requirement then think of that structure. 

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

This tenancy started in December 2018.

 

In July 2021 you were asking about the process of removing other tenants. 

 

The two matters are not connected. 

 

The cottage is a glorified shed. 

 

Is there anything else that you wish to clarify? 

 

Are you subject to government sanctions? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mantis Shrimp and thank you for reading my post and subsequent responses from Members who are trying to help me. 

Your summary is correct. 

The only other thing I would seek to clarify is the current allowable period of Notice to quit -

I am reading variously that this is still 4 - months and 2 - months for assured shorthold tenancy? 

I would be grateful if you could please explain what you mean by 'government sanctions'.

 

Thank you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maketa79

 

Sorry for delay in getting back to you on this.

 

As for you asking about the notice period required as you have never given a notice during the COVID-19/Pandemic and this is your first Notice to Quit I assume you will serve a Section 21 No Fault Notice as long as it was served On or After October 2021 it now 2 Months Notice.

 

(see below link: specifically Section 21 Notices)

 

ENGLAND.SHELTER.ORG.UK

Being given notice by your landlord is the start of eviction proceedings. Most tenants are entitled to be given written notice, but not all

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maketa79

 

Just thought I would pop in to see how this is going and if you have decided how best to approach your Tenants with the Notice to Quit and have you taken onboard my caution in post#15 about the utilities to this cottage/shed?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello stu007 - thank you so much for the timely guidance,  steer and the above link which I appreciate very much. 

I have taken on board all the cautions you have provided which I have to admit, hadn't occurred to me. 

the approach I've decided to take is to try and work with the tenant by having an initial meeting with him - how he engages with the conversation and reactions will determine how then I take things forward. 

I intend to point out the risks and issues, and ultimately my intention, mainly that my personal circumstances have changed and I now need to return home. 

I have some views on how he will react and there are issues around active listening which might bring some barriers to the conversation, but I thought I should give it a try if I am to get an amicable result.

Once again, thank you very much stu007.  Please do not hesitate to add any more comments should anything else cross your mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Something to note with the utilities installed in this cottage/shed that was illegally built and breaches their tenancy agreement is that as the landlord you will need to get a safety inspection done of those utilities to make sure they are compliant and the Tenants will bear the costs for those inspections. (note this inspection will need to be done urgently)

 

Why should you the landlord bear these costs when this was illegally built/breached the Tenancy Agreement.

 

Just something to bear in mind

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello - unclebulgaria67 (&honeybee13),

with respect please see how stu007 has dealt with my enquiry. 

I hope you will see that historical events which you are highlighting are and remain insignificant in this instance. 

The circumstances might be very unusual, but I thought that is why members come on to this Forum for, to seek help on sometimes 'unusual' circumstances. 

In my experience, with the exception of the times I have come across responses such as yours, I find that Forum Members deliver. 

Stu007's advice and guidance was an education for me - he did not brag about it, neither was he patronising. 

That is how it should be. 

There was nothing to be gained by delving into the history except to ferment confusion for those trying to help. 

I'm mystified by your boastful assertions and asking the question

-  Do you think any online forum could provide any useful advice when the position you have outlined is so complicated?". 

Clearly if you had no contribution to my query, you could have elected to help others with less complicated circumstances. 

As it is, Stu007 most definitely resolved my situation and even added extra cautionary notes to his advice.

Great stuff>

Thank you Stu007

- your humility and ability to analyse my situation was second to none!!! 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You came back after 2 months to comment like that??

Stu has really helped with eviction side of things, but do you have an appropriate update to the other advice you've been given?

Like:

On 14/03/2022 at 20:54, honeybee13 said:

your wooden 'cottage' be what I might call a summerhouse? Maybe you could tell us what it measures please?

 

On 15/03/2022 at 01:51, stu007 said:

 

As for the Cottage/Shed I think you need to urgently check it is within Planning Permission.

 

On 15/03/2022 at 01:51, stu007 said:

has an electrical inspection been carried out? where are the electrics coming from/to this Cottage/Shed

 

On 15/03/2022 at 01:51, stu007 said:

that structure needs to urgently be inspected as it has been illegally built on your land and due to the utilities fitted bear in mind the required safety inspections you as a Landlord are required to carry out

 

All the above statements and questions are valid as you as the landlord are accountable in the event someone gets hurt, or worse..

 

So, Stu mentioning 'urgent' multiple times - did you heed this advice or just hear what you wanted to hear and then come back to tell HB and UB how wrong they are?

CAG Site Team and Forum Helpers are unpaid volunteers

Over the years CAG has probably helped hundreds of thousands of people, only a small number of people come back and let us know what happened or to say thank you

and an even smaller number of people ever think to make a donation.

If you are able, without leaving yourself short, consider donating, all donations go towards Site hosting and maintenance - help us stay live for future people in need.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

 

Essential Reading: Dealing with Customer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, OP tends to flip between:

a) asking for advice on a complicated situation and then disagreeing with established posters on needing either/ both of more info on the thread, or  formal legal advice being the best way forward

b) simpering gratitude for replies (provided they tell them what they want to hear), and

c) "The odd disagreement" on previous threads.

So, I can't see this going well without a major shift in the OP's attitude(s).

I also can't see if they are saying that the situation is now resolved or not (and if it is resolved : they've not given any info that might help others in similar circumstances .....)

 

tl;dr   : "Popcorn!"

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@Maketa79

 

Thank you for your kind comment but what I take offence at is you having a go at other members of the Forum in that post just because you disagree/don't like what they have said/asked as you could easily have just ignored that advice bear in mind we are a Self Help Forum.

 

Could you possibly update us on how this has proceeded as it may help others in a similar situation?

 

Importantly again have you have those utilities inspected and certified by a competent professional or professionally removed?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...