Jump to content

mantis shrimp

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    402
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

32 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

2,648 profile views
  1. They will pass your letter to their insurers, and the likelihood is that you will hear from solicitors appointed by the insurers.
  2. I assume that it was you who purchased these goods. As purcaser you have rights - and the seller has obligations - under the Consumer Rights Act. In particular, goods should be of satisfactory quality. Given that more than 30 days have elapsed since purchase, if these goods are not of satisfactory quality you do not have the right to reject them, but have the right to repair or replacement. You should raise this with the seller.
  3. If you release capital early, then - to state the obvious - it will not be available to you later. I am sure that you realise this: just make sure that you think these things through carefully.
  4. I think you need to emulate the current PM in this one respect: draw a line under it and move on.
  5. I mean that if you do what dx suggests and try to put in expert evidence via your witness statement, a vigilant judge will take a thick red pen to those parts of your statement and not take any account of the evidence. Exper evidence can only be introduced with permission of the court, and must comply with CPR Part 35. Attempts to introduce such evidence by any other means should be rejected.
  6. Look, whoever is running this site, it's happening again. Not only can I still not send or receive any DMs, having previously been able to do so, but once again I am not allowed to see anything in the delivery services section. @Andyorch sort of helped a while ago. None of the rest of you in the site team so much as asked if you could help. And messages using the contact button are ignored. This is now my third thread about this, FCOL. What is going on? And in answer to the question below, you have not helped.
  7. statute barred means that the period set by the Limitation Act 1980 after which a claim may not be brought has expired.
  8. Why can I no longer send or receive PMs? Come on, "Site Team". 

  9. @Andyorch will know the thread in question. It seems to have disappeared. I can find no trace of the posts, even looking at the recent post history on my profile and Andrew's. What is going on?
  10. That's good news. When I saw the title I thought you might be an oligarch!
  11. The facts described may give grounds to take action seeking court orders to make the directors personally liable. It is possible that they might argue that a declaration was made on the application to strike off the company that should not have been made (that the company had no unpaid debts). But would you spend the money on a fairly complicated claim for this amount? I would not advise a client to do this.
  12. https://www.standard.co.uk/business/EVRi-changes-its-name-to-evri-after-parcel-mishandling-allegations-b987530.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1647008597-1 Parcel delivery company EVRi is changing its name to Evri, in the wake of allegations of poor customer service and parcel mishandling and parcel mishandling. The new brand is due to launch with a national TV campaign next week. The rebrand comes in the wake of negative headlines about the company. Workers at the courier service, which is one of the top 5 in the UK by sales, were found to carelessly throw parcels around delivery depots over people’s fences, video obtained by the Times showed. EVRi came last in a delivery firm league table produced by Citizens Advice in November with an overall rating of 1.5 stars. Citizens’ advice gave the company a 2-star rating for ‘trust’ and a 1-star rating for handling customer problems. EVRi said that findings by the Times were “unfounded and do not reflect our business,” while it described research by Citizens’ Advice as “flawed
  13. you can write to confirm the conversation and what was said to you. Send a copy of your letter to the court.
×
×
  • Create New...