Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letting Agent & Landlord won't accept me rescinding as a Guarantor


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I signed to be a guarantor for a friend when she rented a property nearly 5 years ago. The tenancy was a 12 month AST. 

Earlier this year I decided it was time to rescind my guarantorship and so both myself and the Tenant notified the Letting Agent and all other relevant parties to remove my name from that arrangement and relieve me of that obligation. The tenant by the way has never defaulted on her rent to this day, throughout the entire tenancy.

It has been over 6 months since this change request was initiated, but what has since transpired has been a case of the Letting Agent and Landlord deliberately doing everything to frustrate me and responding with countless misleading email responses that they're still awaiting a response from such and such agent, landlord, some individual, etc, etc.

After months of putting up with their games, I recently issued them with a deadline and ultimatum that if they failed to implement the change requested jointly by the Tenant and myself by close of business Friday, 06 Oct 2023, I would report the matter to the appropriate authorities. They eventually came back to advise that the Landlord has advised that he'd like the Guarantorship arrangements to remain in place.

As far as the tenancy is concerned, here are some key details to describe the current status.

  • The rent was increased on a new tenancy agreement issued about a couple of years ago, without any notice to me.
  • The tenancy lapsed into a periodic tenancy more than a year ago, as no new tenancy agreement was issued to the tenant at the end of the previous term.

I therefore have a few questions for which I hope some of our esteemed and knowledgeable forum members here can assist with. I'd like to know the following:

  1. Where or how would be the best route for me to seek redress to my grievance?
  2. Would it be valid to lodge a complaint with the Information Commissioner's Office for continued misuse of my personal data by the Letting Agents/Landlord, etc?
  3. I am led to believe that changes to the original tenancy, for example, the rent increase of which I was not notified, renders the original guarantorship to now become invalid. Is this indeed the case?
  4. I am led to believe that when a tenancy lapses into a periodic tenancy, a Guarantor's obligation can/should cease. Is this the case?
  5. Can a guarantorship arrangement continue in perpetuity?
  6. Can a Landlord and/or Letting Agent impose guarantor obligations on a person, even where the Guarantor and Tenant, two main principal parties, have asked for that arrangement to be terminated?

Some Useful Articles On This Subject Matter
Landlordlawblog
Citizens Advice
Robsols
Money Forums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please upload the guarantee document that you signed 5 years ago. Cover up all information that would identify you, your friend or the property.

The starting point for issues about guaranteeship is what the deed of guarantee says.

If you succeed in terminating your guarantee is there a risk the landlord will issue a s21 notice to evict your friend? Although that would seem a remarkably short-sighted thing to do when they have a tenant who apparently has been a good tenant for years, always paid rent on time, presumably has looked after the property and complies with all terms of the tenancy. Is your tenant finacially  'stable', in employment and able to afford the rent in the future?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Ethel Street very grateful for your response.

I will indeed try and upload the deed as best as I can, although as it's a PDF file and therefore not easily editable, I'll simply use my Windows snipping tool to snip and share the relevant section. 

Regarding your other queries, perhaps my feedback will be as follows:

1. If I remember correctly, S21s were recently abolished and so that eviction route is shut anyway. The tenant though has revealed that the Landlord served her notice to vacate the property some time ago, as he was seeking to sell the property.

2. The tenant is in active employment within the health service, extremely hard-working, and has been actively progressing her career as a specialist health professional, so she frankly ticks all the usual boxes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ethel Street said:

Or use my low-tech workaround: print out a copy, cover up bits I want to hide with a black felt tip marker, then recopy and upload that 😉 (I'm not very techie!)

Lol..........I actually forgot I had access to some tools that could allow me to edit the file. I've cropped out all personal data and have attached it below. Thanks

 

 

guarantor_agreement.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, hitman126 said:

The tenant though has revealed that the Landlord served her notice to vacate the property some time ago, as he was seeking to sell the property.

Legislation to ban s21 is going through parliament but AFAIK is some way from actually getting into law so at the moment I think a LL could still use it. 

But your comment "The tenant though has revealed that the Landlord served her notice to vacate the property some time ago, as he was seeking to sell the property." sounds like she has already been served with a s21 notice. Is that correct? How has she responded to this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Ethel Street said:

Legislation to ban s21 is going through parliament but AFAIK is some way from actually getting into law so at the moment I think a LL could still use it. 

But your comment "The tenant though has revealed that the Landlord served her notice to vacate the property some time ago, as he was seeking to sell the property." sounds like she has already been served with a s21 notice. Is that correct? How has she responded to this?

So feedback received is that, yes the tenant was served with a S21 notice back in approximately February of this year, with the landlord demanding that the family move out by July. This was then followed by another letter from the landlord's solicitors, asking them to vacate the property by middle of this month. Tenant says she's not responded yet to this second notice from the solicitors.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, that probably explains why LL doesn't want to release you from the guarantee. LL probably thinks that a tenant under a s21 notice might stop paying rent before they move out. 

Is tenant taking advice from housing charities or legal advice on her options? It's not something I know a lot about but there's excellent guidance on the Shelter website.

Section 21 eviction - Shelter England

Once she actually leaves your guarantee terminates and the issue is resolved per para 7 of the Guarantor Agreement.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So tenant told me a couple of days ago she's seeking advice through the Citizens Advice Bureau regarding her eviction. And you are right, the LL has probably taken that defiant stance on my guarantorship, based on the knowledge that the tenant is expected to leave the property imminently.

I myself wasn't aware of the full details and specific timelines regarding her S21 Notice until our conversation a couple of days ago and indeed a few minutes ago. It was purely coincidental that I requested to be taken off as a guarantor, just around the time when she was also being evicted.

In all honesty, it's not at all a big deal for me whether or not I remain her guarantor as I fully trust her and her family, but it's just that when earlier this year I received another annual renewal notification via email from a company called Zero Deposit, relating to her tenancy and my guarantorship, I just felt it was about time I broke away from any such obligation and hence my subsequent action. I'd frankly lost complete track of the fact I was her guarantor until that renewal notification came in. It's just a useful lesson learned for the future, I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can confirm that S21 is very much still active and in place and I think its potential ending might not be as good for tenants as many think as a number will end up with at fault terminations instead.  (but that's another issue).  As S21 is a no fault eviction it may be that the landlord is looking to do something else with the property e.g. sell it and is no reflection on the tenant or their conduct.

The determination as to whether you remain as a guarantor until the landlord ends it will depend on the terms of what you originally signed.  The form I use limits it to the tenancy period and rather than issue an extension I prefer to issue a new agreement but there are examples where extensions can include for the guarantee to be extended and there is nothing (or little) that can be done about it.

Be careful with Citizens Advice as they may not be specialist in Tenancy Law  

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...