Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - no stopping - Southend Airport


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

I have been ignoring a few letters from Vehicle Control Services. Specifically the Notice to Keeper, Demand for Payment, Final Reminder and the Final Demand.

 

Now we are at the stage where we just received the Letter before Claim and i believe i am now supposed to respond with something along the lines of:

 

Dear VCS,

 

In reply to your letter sent on xx/xx/xxxx.

 

There has been no breach of any contractual agreement therefore I owe you nothing.

 

Regards

 

Have i got it right so far? Just wanted to make sure i am doing this all correctly.

 

Also, accompanying the Letter before Claim was Annex 1 and Annex 2 which consists of an Information Sheet, Reply Form with a Signature Section and a Financial Statement.

 

My question is, do i even need to fill any of this out? Or could i not just type up this response and print it out, put it in the envelope and send it back?

 

1 Date of the infringement15/10/2019

 

2 Date on the NTK21/10/2019

 

3 Date received29/10/2019

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]I don't think so. But i can't find the original NTK. I only have a blurry photo.

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?YES

 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it upNO

 

7 Who is the parking company?VEHICLE CONTROL SERVICES

 

8. Where exactly?SOUTHEND AIRPORT. ESSEX

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.Unsure

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS.

 

NTK.pdf Final Reminder Demand For Payment.pdf

Letter before Claim (2).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hello and welcome to CAG. Thank you for the information we need, the forum experts should be along to advise later.

 

Please don't do anything about contacting them until the guys are able to view what's happened so far. :)

 

Best, HB

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a No Stopping incident, as per stopped on an access road? could you give a bit of background history, so that we can be sure ita a Byelaws issue and advise the correct wording to send Simple Simon.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello SS,

 

That seems to be the case, the pictures taken of my vehicle, shows that it is stopped just outside of Southend airport with no clear images of the driver (whatsoever) but clearly in a no stop zone.

 

Not something that was noticed at the time however.

 

Thanks 

Deadlock

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need the photos please CLEARLY.

just blank out reg.

 

that's not a good enough snotty letter either

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS Spycar PCN - no stopping - Southend Airport

so spycar capture

and that's outside the terminal just like the other spycar NTK pictures here..

 

so await simple simons letter of claim if he is brave enough.

and read the southend no stopping threads here already

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for clarifying:

 

So I do need to respond?

 

Do I need to fill in any of the forms provided by them, or do I just type up a letter and send to them?

 

Do you have a better snotty letter?

 

Thanks for your assistance all

 

Deadlock

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots of VCS no stopping threads here with the required letter text to send

but you DO NOT respond at all until you get that letter of claim.

 

and you put that and your intended reply up here 1st before sending it.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so it does 

wonder why it wasn't uploaded..

so the 30days has begun ticking...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies, I thought it was!!

Letter before Claim (2).pdf

 

DX, I found the below in a post that you also were involved in, it has a very similar circumstance to my own, would this be a sufficient reply in my position?

 

Unfortunately for you I wasn’t born yesterday so I won’t be paying your demand, you know what I know and that is there is no liability in this matter because the land is covered by its own byelaws, the signage is prohibitive and not an offer of a contract so none has been breached and anyway the POFA limits any charge to the specified sum so your demand for £160 is just a nonsense.

 

As VCS has been spanked at court on this very same thing several times before I suggest that you discontinue this foolishness and that way you will at least obey Civil Procedure. I know that may well be a first for you but call it your new year's resolution.

 

Should you decide to continue then I shall be asking for a full costs recovery order for unreasonable behaviour and then seek damages for breach of the DPA.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean your letter..not the form..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't need their forms just the letter, returning the form merely encourages them to think you will  wet yourself cough up if they issue a claimform after the 30 days

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the reply form and wrote the previously mentioned;

 

This is exactly what I wrote on the reply form, obviously also my Signature and date on the back also.

Replyform.png

 

On 15/01/2020 at 20:32, Deadlock said:
On 14/01/2020 at 19:42, Deadlock said:

My question is, do i even need to fill any of this out? Or could i not just type up this response and print it out, put it in the envelope and send it back?

 

Do I need to fill in any of the forms provided by them, or do I just type up a letter and send to them?

 

 

I was asking 😀. Too late now...

 

Shouldn't matter though should it?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh well

wont harm

 

but we did say numerous times

write a letter....

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

at least the response is somehting they will be familiar with and also correct.

Now as you wil know by reading a few hundred threads about VCS, they are greedya nd stupid, a bad combination, so it is likely they will issue a claim against you anyway.

You now need to understand what this is all about and it is not parking as you werent parked but about the enforceability of a contract and that assumes one can exist between you and them in the first place.

 

Get busy both here and by reading  a mass of what can be found on the Parking Pranksters blogspot. that is full of commentary but more importantly reports on court cases where you will find some that are identical in law to yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The airport has ByeLaws, VCS can only sue for breach of a contract they imagine they have with you, however No Stopping is a Prohibition, so no contract can ever be formed or exist for them to,claim a bean for anything.  Won't stop them trying though.  So do as EB says read up on the Airport threads and look at Parking Prankster.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

Quote

 

Hello All,

 

Developments in this situation are that; this has reached my door yesterday.

 

I have scanned all of the pages and they can be reviewed in the attached.

 

What are the appropriate steps from this point?

 

Thanks again for your assistance

 

Deadlock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by brassnecked
No need to post Claimform, just details of claim imafes removed BN
Link to post
Share on other sites

The four threads below yours all have "VCS Claim Form" in the title.  Have a read of them, they will tell you how to acknowledge service and send off a CPR request.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is also written into the guides for using the forum to post up any docs as pdf's and not insert them into the thread directly

we dont need to see the claim form we have seen hundreds.

All we need to know is date of issue and the exact reason thy put for their cause for action.

 

The suppoed breach is the same codswallop they usually use so easy to compose a suitable outline defence and we can help you with that but you still need to learn a lot more about the goings on of the aprking co's and court procedure so you dont drop yourself in it

 

Now the best thing you can do is set up an account at moneyclaim online (they have 2 versions, one of which doesnt need a govt gateway 16 character login and password) and just acknowledge the claim and tick the box to say defending in full. dont submit a defence yet, you have another fortnight to do that but you must do the AOS now as you are running out of time

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...