Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the summary you have given. I think you will need to commission a fully detailed point by point report which identifies the issues, the cause of the issues and then separately a quotation for resolving them. I think you need two quotations – comparative. Do you know the name of the person who owns TB plastering? Do you know their address? Do you know they have any assets? It sounds to me as if it's going to be quite an expensive job. On the basis of what you say, if you bring a legal action then you will have no difficulty getting a judgement in your favour the problem will be enforcing the judgement. What address do they use on their bill? You need to have a look at the land registry web check service for about three quid check to see who the owner of a particular property is. Of course you could simply wait until they decide to sue you and then bring a counterclaim but there is a big chance that they won't bother to sue and so it may be down to you to take your own action to undo the mess they have made. Come back here when you have found this out
    • Investors expect artificial intelligence to unleash a new wave of growth.View the full article
    • The first thing is to let the surgery know that you didn't enter your car registrtaion when you visited and ask them to confirm to Euro that you were a patient on that day and Euro should cancel. The quicker you do that before matters escalate, the more lkely that they will cancel. You could suggest that  they put up a sign reminding drivers to enter their vrm. thank you for posting the whole of the PCN which confirms that it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 in two ways. [2][e] of S9 states (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges; Your PCN does not. All it does is to ask the driver to pay which is not enough. In addition under [2][a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. Instead it gives the arrival and departure times of the car as it passes the ANPR cameras which is not the same. That means that you as keeper are not liable to pay the PCN only the driver is now liable. Courts do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person so proving who was driving will be difficult for Euro.
    • Pro peace/anti war/anti-atrocity marches which included many Jewish protestors carrying banners (as previously linked)  decrying the atrocities of Israel and the IDF such as 'Not in my name' 'Never again to ANY people'   Although a very small handful of unconscionable Hamas supporters were among the many MANY thousands of pro peace protestors, even they displayed nothing like the hatred and violence demonstrated by the 100 or so far right rabble who attacked police, tried to attack the peaceful protestors and then attempted to violently breach the cenotaph itself. The pro peace/end atrocities in Palestine protests have remained largely peaceful despite ongoing atrocities by the state of Israel and the IDF.   Even today, unarmed starving civilians in a supposedly safe camp in Gaza were murdered by shelling and bombing from afar by Israeli forces, while violent Israeli settlers have forcefully deposed more Palestians from their homes and lands on the west bank with the aide and support of Israeli military forces - just as the Israeli forces are forcibly relocating civilians in Gaza with even more horrors, atrocities and violence. These atrocities by the IDF in Gaza include starvation, forced relocation, bombing homes, health centers and refugee camps, denying food water and medical support, murdering journalists and health workers and the mass murder of women and children  .. are growing alarmingly and horribly reminiscent of some of the similar but wider scale utterly monstrous genocidal atrocities by Nazis on the Jewish people, which makes these actions by Israel and the IDF even more unconscionable and deplorable.  
    • Hi all, I was wondering what peoples thoughts / advice is for my following situation. Unfortunately, I have been caught speeding on the m6 - 56mph in a temporary 40 zone. I did not realise that the speed for the current stretch I was on, was reduced to a 40, I knew that some parts was bought down to 50mph but not 40. Ultimately, it is on own fault for not being more focused at the time.  I was wondering whether anyone caught doing similar speeds over the limit have been offered a speed awareness course. My letter states that the records show I have not met the criteria for a speed awareness course, which I feel is harsh given this is my first offence & the threshold for consideration is upto 53mph as stated below, our speed narrowly exceeded the limit and falls within the guidelines set out by the National Police Chief Council (NPCC) up to: 31 mph in a 20 mph area 42 mph in a 30 mph area 53 mph in a 40 mph area. Could I argue that my speedometer is not entirely accurate as such I should be considered in the 53mph bracket above and considered for a speed awareness course?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCM/Gladstones Claimform - scratched 7am not PM on visitors voucher - Tachbrook SW1 V (Peabody Estate Pimlico, London).


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter from PCM for an alleged parking breach which I had no idea about.

 

Apparently my car was ticketed but I was not aware of a parking ticket being issued until receiving their letter.

 

Upon receiving their letter, believing it was wrong and that they were trying to falsely penalise me, I ignored their letter. I received another letter stating the same and and ignored that too. A friend of mine suggested that I continue to ignore them because there was nothing they can do, given that their letters were not Penalty charge notices, but were parking charge notices. 

 

However, I've now received a claim form from Northants county court. Gladstone's solicitors, are working on behalf of the parking company and are now taking the matter to court. 

 

I contacted PCM for a subject access request and asked for photos of the alleged breach and all other correspondence they have in relation to me or my vehicle, and that they should include any correspondence between themselves and any third parties. They sent me a copy of the original ticket I did not receive, copies of letters and photos which shows that there was a parking permit on the car which had expired at the time they took the photo of my car. I instantly became aware that the time had been incorrectly scratched. Instead of it saying 19:50, it was 7:50. This was a genuine mistake.

 

Now, due to the time that had passed, I cannot prove that the car was not in that area at that time. In fact, at the time the ticket was scratched, the car wasn't even in London. I could have shown an image of my car on my driveway as I have CCTV but, it only goes back to July. The incident happened in February. I cannot think of any other way to prove that the car was not in the area at the time scratched on the ticket, which would evidence that selecting 7am instead of 7pm was a genuine mistake.

 

Now, it appears I will have to pay out £265 to Gladstones.

 

The other thing is, the cover letter they sent relating to my Subject Access Request mentions a different PC number, which I have no idea about. The extract states

'It should be noted that your name whilst was initially active on 10 charges is now only active on one charge PC1*******, therefore on the remaining 9 charges we have only included the information that is relevant to yourself.' 

 

I really don't understand why there is a different PC number to the one which corresponds to all the images they have sent me.

 

Is there anyway I can challenge this as it really was a genuine mistake, or should I just pay what they are asking for?

 

I would be grateful for any help.

I really can't afford what they are asking at this time.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum.  And you certainly do not pay what the scumbags are asking for. The most they can charge is £100.

 

Well done for going ahead and sending them an SAR-could you please post up what they have sent.

 

When did you receive the Claim Form and have you replied to the Court .

 

 

Could you please complete the two questionnaires below so that we can help you get out of this.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way court claims take place in England & Wales is that costs are included with the claim.

 

So give in now, or lose in court, you more or less pay the same.  Obvious conclusion - you might as well fight the fleecers.

 

Please fill in the stickies as LFI has asked, you have only a limited time to reply to the claim form otherwise you will lose by default.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/11/2022 at 21:46, Disgruntled driver2022 said:

and that they should include any correspondence between themselves and any third parties.

 

nope that's not strictly your data, where did you get that idea that you are entitled to that from?

 

i have a nasty feeling you've been wrongly following your mates advice, you must have gotten a letter of claim too? those should never be ignored.

 

the SAR serves not real purpose sadly now, that should be done via a CPR 31:14....

however please complete this sticky AS A PRIORITY.

 

also scan up every correspondence in/out, bothsides of everything, suitably redacted to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY.

 

read our upload guide CAREFULLY

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PCM/Gladstones Claimform - 7AM scratched on purchased parking voucher rather than 7PM .

Pleas fill in the sticky as requested, then this can be moved forward.  There is bound to be somewhere where they messed up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get this moving........

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton County Court Business Centre

 

MCOL Northampton N1 ? Yes

  

Name of the Claimant : Parking Control Management (UK) Limited

 

Claimants Solicitors: Gladstones Solicitors Limited)

 

Date of issue – 11 November 2022

 

Date for AOS - 29 November 2022

 

Date to submit Defence - , 13 December

 

What is the claim for – 

1.The driver of the vehicle with registration *******(the ‘Vehicle’) parked in breach of the terms of the parking stipulated on the signage (the ‘Contract’) at Tachbrook – SW1V, on 28/02/2022 thus incurring the parking charge (the ‘PCN’).

 

2.The PCN was not paid within 28 days of issue.

 

3. The Claimant claims the unpaid PCN from the Defendant as the driver/keeper of the Vehicle.

 

4. Despite demands being made, the Defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability.

 

THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £100 for the PCN, £70 contractual costs pursuant to the Contract and PCN terms and conditions, together with statutory interest of £10.68 pursuant to s69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at 10.25% per annuam., continuing at £0.05 per day.

 

What is the value of the claim? £265.68

  

Amount Claimed £180

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount £265.68

 

.........................................

 

1 The date of infringement? 28/02/2022
 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] N 
 

If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it,

suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide] I’ve attached the email I sent to the parking company requesting a subject access request. I read somewhere on one of these forums that I should email them, then read somewhere else that I should not.

 

Has there been a response? Parking company sent a cover letter which I don’t understand. They also sent pictures of the contravention.
 

Please AS A PDFFILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide] I have uploaded everything they sent, as well as a copy of the claim form.

 

If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first. Desperately hoping you can support me with this.

 

Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] Yes there was a notice to keeper which has been uploaded.

 

What date is on it? I believe they posted it out on 31/03/2022
 

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? No. I only received photos when I did the SAR
 

[scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s That has been done.

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] – I believe it did. Please could you confirm as notice was uploaded.
 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]  – No, I have not appealed as yet. I have been trying to gather information on how best to approach the situation.
 

5 Who is the parking company? Parking Control Management (UK) Limited
 

6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Give answer here – Tachbrook SW1V (This is on a Peabody Estate based in Pimlico, London).

 

Hi all,

Apologies for delay in responding. I have been struggling to use the site as I am not tech savvie.

I have been up all night trying to get my head around what I think you have asked me to do, and being mindful of the time closing in, I am left feeling quite stressed.

 

Thank you, I am really trying to get this done. 

 

I really do hope so. I cannot afford to payout £265 at this time.

 

.............................

 

 

SAR Reply + Claimform.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

So parking without a Permit in a Residents Parking Scheme, I notice they didn't include a picture of the entrance sign to the area covered.  No

 

Now are you a Resident?

 

Or a Visitor?

 

That will guide what to respond with later on

 

These schemes are designed by the fleecer to trap residents also say they have courtesy car, as theirs is in for service etc, permit in their car, they get a PCN for the courtesy car non display.

 

Time is marching so hopefully tghe others will be along to help you get this moving today.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Disgruntled driver2022 said:

Date for AOS - ( 21 November 2022

Actually 30 November - which has already passed.

 

You need to do Acknowledgement of Service now otherwise the fleecers will apply for judgement and you will lose by default

 

The instructions on how to do so are in post 21 here  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/432762-eps-anpr-pcn-ignored-loc-now-claimform-29-sec-stay-shoulder-of-mutton-birmingham/

 

Do this immediately, no messing about.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 do it now right now ASAP.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe I have done that via the website www.moneyclaim.gov.uk  website.

 

On there I acknowledged receiving the claim and asked for more time to defend it. 

 

No, the driver was a visitor not a resident. Seriously, this was a genuine mistake but because all this time has now passed, we cannot prove the car was somewhere else at the time the permit was scratched out.

 

I believe there is a sign at the beginning of the estate somewhere.

 

We don't normally pay attention to that as we know you need a permit and we always use one.

 

Its just on that day, we arrived and was in a hurry, we put the permit on the car, stayed for a short while, then went out for the evening.

 

We returned and kept the same permit as it had not yet expired.

 

We stayed overnight thinking that the permit was good until the following evening, not realising that we had scratched out 7am instead of 7pm, but it is almost impossible to prove now. It just looks like we overstayed by two hours when in reality we did not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Disgruntled driver2022 said:

I believe I have done that via the website www.moneyclaim.gov.uk  website. On there I acknowledged receiving the claim and asked for more time to defend it. 

Well done! 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So your next steps are.

 

1. Get a CPR request going to Gladdys.

 

2.  Get whoever you were visiting to look at their lease and see what is says about parking.  There is a load of case law regarding something called Supremacy of Contract which means that if this person had an agreement about parking before the fleecers came in the charlatans can't override it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the defence will be the standard 3 line defence with nothing beyond what is in the sticky you dont give them any inkling of where they might have messed up especially as Gladdys are involved.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform

.

register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.


Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...


You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 

then log in to the MCOL Website

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim


type your name ONLY


no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

………….
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Notice to Keeper does not comply with the requirements of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

 

This means that only the driver is responsible for the debt since the mistakes they have mad prevents them from transferring the alleged breach from the driver to the keeper. so it is important to not divulge who was driving.  After all the driver can be one of the family, a friend or anyone who already has a valid insurance policy to drive a vehicle.

 

Should it get as far as Court they cannot assume that the driver and the keeper are the same person -they have to prove it. So well  done for not appealing since that is often when the keeper errs by saying I parked the car rather than the driver parked the car as an example of how unwittingly who was driving is revealed.the parking time

 

Why does it not comply?

They have to notify the keeper who the keeper is. I cannot find it anywhere on the NTK.

 

They have to specify a parking period which they haven't done. They quoted 09.29 and the time immediately preceding that time.  It's virtually meaningless. Was it 30 seconds, two minutes? How long? One could claim from their statement that you need only to have stopped there for less than five minutes which is allowable as a free period to give motorists time to read the terms of parking and leaving if they are found o be unacceptable.

 

In addition the wording where they say they can transfer to debt to the keeper after 28  days is missing . Instead of saying "providing we have complied with all the applicable conditions it witters on about recovery action which is not the wording required by PoFA Schedule 4 S8[2][f]. In fact I challenge them where Schedule 4 allows them to utilise recovery action. It does appear to be a lie.

 

I am trying to get my head around the Permit.

I take it that once you have scratched in the time you have 24 hours[?] to stay or a different time?

 

I have noticed that the PCN was issued  at 09.29 on the 28th but the photos of the car were taken at 18.01 0n the 28th and your Permit was scratched on 27th at 07.50. 

 

Can you explain how their permit system operates please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever they say as LFI indicates they have not complied with POFA so cannot transfer liability to the keeper, and the times do look incomprehensible.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys,

It looks like the times above the photos aren't photographic timestamps.

It looks like the time when they were all recovered from the computer system to be printed for the SAR?

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point Nicky Boy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the date is right: 28.02.2022.

 

But the time certainly isn't: they've put 18:01.  Yet the NTD has the time of 09:29!!!

 

However, if you look closed at the top bit of the photos, they are timestamped as either 09:28 or 09:29.

 

I'm in the same boat as LFI, I can't get my head around the permit system, can you please explain?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys,

How specific does the parking location need to be?

Tachbrook - SW1V is extremely vague.

 

SW1V is a large area.

There is a Tachbrook Street, but that itself covers around 15 postcodes...

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is also worthy to note they have your email address

 

you need to kill that ASAP now, by sending ONE further email to them stating email is NOT to be used for any further comms regarding our mutual claim., else they will be sending stuff i min before a court deadline removing your chance to counter them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Thank you all for your help so far. 

Please can you clarify what CPR means.

Sorry, I am super green with all this.

 

Also, will I have time to send anything off to Gladstones?

I don't believe I have that much time left to submit my defence.

 

Sorry, I don't know how to use the site very well. When I click on the + sign to enter a message, a quote box shows up as well. 

 

I think I'm getting the hang of it now🙈.

 

Unfortunately, the tenant has just left the country and won't be back for months. I don't think I can look to her for help. She's been living there for years and probably doesn't even know where her tenancy agreement is...knowing her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...