Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, why do DVLA (via that leaflet) say that S.88 MAY allow a driver to be treated as if they have a valid licence (after an application that discloses a medical condition) ?
    • Thanks for that, Bazza. It sheds some more light on things but I’m still by no means sure of the OP’s father’s likelihood of successfully defending the charge. This in particular from the guidance stands out me: He does not meet all the s88 criteria. S88 is clear and unambiguous: It makes no provision for either the driver or a medical professional to make a judgement on his fitness to drive under s88. S92(4) and the June 2013 guidance you mention defines in what circumstances the SoS must issue a licence. It does no modify s88 in any way. However, delving further I have noticed that the DVLA provides a service where the driver can enter a relevant medical condition to obtain the correct documentation to apply for a licence: https://www.gov.uk/health-conditions-and-driving/find-condition-online I haven’t followed this through because I don’ have the answers that the OP’s father would give to the questions they will ask and in any case it requires the input of personal information and I don’t want to cause complications with my driving licence. It is possible, however, that the end result (apart from providing the necessary forms) is a “Yes/No” answer to whether the driver can continue to drive (courtesy of s88). With that in mind, I should think at  the very least the OP’s father should have completed that process but there is no mention that he has. The Sleep Apnoea Trust gives some useful guidance on driving and SA: https://sleep-apnoea-trust.org/driving-and-sleep-apnoea/detailed-guidance-to-uk-drivers-with-sleep-apnoea/ I know nothing about SA at all and found It interesting to learn that there are various “grades” of the condition. But the significant thing which struck me is that it is only the least trivial version that does not require a driver to report his condition to the DVLA. But more significant than that is that the SA Trust makes no mention of continuing to drive once the condition has been reported. The danger here is that the court will simply deconstruct s88 and reach the same conclusion that I have. I accept, having looked at the DVLA guidance, that there may be (as far as they are concerned) scope for s88 to apply contrary to the conditions stated in the legislation. Firstly, we don’ know whether there is and secondly we don’t know whether the OP’s father would qualify to take advantage of it. Of course he could argue that he need no have reported his condition. The SA trust certainly emphasises that the condition should not be reported until a formal detailed diagnosis is obtained. But the fact is he did report it. As soon as he does that, as far as I can see,  s88 is no longer available to him. Certainly as it stands I maintain my opinion that he was not allowed to continue driving under s88. The only way I would change this is to see the end result of the DVLA exercise I mentioned above. If that said he could continue driving he would have a defence to the charge. Without it I am not confident.  
    • Americans are already keen on UK-made coins, and the Mint said it has seen a 118 per cent increase in sales to the US since 2022.View the full article
    • Right, my friend has just called me. He has indeed had to cancel bookings in the past from his end. There is a specific number for Booking.com that he calls.   After that Booking.com jump into action and contact you re refund and/or alternative accommodation. I suppose it's all logical - the party cancelling the booking has to inform Booking.com. So the gite owner needs to contact Booking.com on the cancellation number.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Issue with waste disposal broker overcharge***Refunded***


modo82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2223 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys this is my first post. I appoligise if I accidently break rules.

 

Background

I been using a waste disposal broker for my sandwich bar. All was going well until I received an over loading invoice which had 2 dates that i had apparently over loaded. Charge amount 69.05

 

10/01/2018 overload by 25kg = £5.25+vat was using 660ltre bin allowance 42kg

 

31/01/2018 overloaded by 249kg = £52.29+vat was using 1100ltre bin allowance 70kg

Total = £69.05

 

between these 2 dates I had actually received a larger bin so when the collection happened on the 10/01/2018 i was using a 660 litre bin which had a 42kg allowance then on the 31/01/2018 I was using a larger bin which is a 1100litre bin which has an allowance of 70kg

 

Grounds for dispute

My dispute is if I only went over by 25kg on a 42kg allowance how have i gone over by a Wapping 249kg on a larger bin which has a 70kg allowance. Also that is a lot of weight to put in a 1100 litre bin please my own rubbish there’s clearly a mistake

 

when i raised this issue with the broker all they kept telling me is they have tracking records from the bin collection. However that’s not what I’m disputing (if that not what they had on their records then they wouldn’t be charging me in the first place). I’m disputing the legitimacy of the charge IE did they register the correct bin when they did the lift, I know they collect multiple bins from the same location maybe they lifting another bin by mistake. How do I know they didn’t receive a back hander from someone to throw there bins away and decided to place it in mine

Now they have basically refused to credit the charge although I have had one of their own member of staff admit the figures do look off. I feel there just trying to bully this amount out of me.

As brokers the waste company they are contracting to collect the waste are the ones provide them with the collection/lift info. I feel they can’t be bothered to investigate with the waste company what’s gone wrong

Actions taken

I am still using them to collect my waste as I am contracted to them till April 2019 and pay my waste invoice but u haven’t paid the over charge.

So I have received a letter stating

1. they now will add a charge of between £40 to £60 to the charge ( haven’t actually stated amount)

2. the next course of action is to commence county court proceeding to recover debt and will result in added interest and fees

I know in my gut there just trying to bully me into just shutting up and paying.

Can anyone advise what action I should take?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of questions.

 

1. Do you accept that you were overweight on the smaller bin?

2. What kind of rubbish to you typically put in these bins, and do you remember if there was anything unusually heavy thrown away on these occasions?

3. How often are your collections?

4. Where are your bins kept between collection dates i.e. are they secure?

5. How long (minutes/hours/days) between putting the bins out and the actual collection taking place?

6. Do you know how your bins are weighed (presumably it is a weighing system incorporated into the bin lift on the bin lorry)?

7. What kind of businesses are around you and do you know what bins they use (same company?) and what kind of waste they're chucking?

 

However, having said all of that, the charge is about £55.00. The likelihood of them issuing Court Proceedings for £55.00 is slim. If you were to file a defence to the claim it would certainly render it uneconomic to pursue.

 

Therefore I'd be tempted to just stand your ground on this.

 

Or if you accept you may have been overweight by some degree then make an offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to a more appropriate forum....please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that you are only allowed to load the bins with 42kg & 70kg repectively. Having a look at some quotes the payload of a 660L as 275kg & 1100L as 440kg. It sounds as if they are being very economical with the weight allowed. I am always sceptical about so called "business brokers" as usually they only look after themselves and not the Client especially as you can do the majority yourself and for free. I think we should have a look at the contract you have.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your responses guys

 

here are the answers to super villians questions

1. Do you accept that you were overweight on the smaller bin?

The smaller bin could of maybe gone over by 25 kg as its not i large weight and maybe that week there could have been extra weight i did notice it was full to the max which is way i order a larger bin.

2. What kind of rubbish to you typically put in these bins, and do you remember if there was anything unusually heavy thrown away on these occasions?

It general sandwhich bar waste micture of food waste and supplier packaging etc

3. How often are your collections?

Once a week

4. Where are your bins kept between collection dates i.e. are they secure?

bins are keep behind my shop in a alleyway with a locked gate plus the bin itself is locked

5. How long (minutes/hours/days) between putting the bins out and the actual collection taking place?

bins are put out daily colloction is once a week on a wednesaday

6. Do you know how your bins are weighed (presumably it is a weighing system incorporated into the bin lift on the bin lorry)?

its a weighing system incorparated into lorry

7. What kind of businesses are around you and do you know what bins they use (same company?) and what kind of waste they're chucking?

There are food businesses/ restaurants and a very large leasuire center the same company that collects my waste also collects theres on the same day

 

Ploddertom-yes on the colletion when i had 660ltr bin i was only allowed 42kg and when i had the 1100ltr bin it was only 70kg

Link to post
Share on other sites

im thinking of just emailing them back one more time stating my arguement and basically letting them know im willing to pay for first charge but not the second as i feel its a mistake.

 

does anyone have any advice on how i should word the email.????

 

i am also willing to still work with them but i dont think i want to pay any further invoices untill i get the one cancelled as i think they will just take any payment i make towards this overcharge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Ploddertom-yes on the colletion when i had 660ltr bin i was only allowed 42kg and when i had the 1100ltr bin it was only 70kg

 

 

[/color] [/color][/size]

 

On that basis it seems you are only allowed to just cover the base of the bin, I'm allowed to put more in my wheelie bin at home. Personally I think you have been had as the service you have is not fit for your business. Do you pay by the lift or a set amount each week/month. You need to look closer at your contract.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ploddertom - charged per lift which is a set amount. the allowance is low i did look at other coomercial waste collectors they where all roughly the same (unless i missed something) residential waste has more allowance which is ridiculious.

 

Despite we still manage to stay with in the weight limit i tend to descard anything heavy myself. Saying we went over by 249kg clearly an error.

 

proberbly just trying to squeeze some more money out of me. im wondering if this is a common tactic with these company as i would imagine alot of businesses woudnt bother about £55 and just pay. Why should i allow them into scaring me to pay a unjust charge. when i rasied the issue they would even answer any of my point just keep repeating we have the tracking data when i asked can you please send data they sent me a sceen shot off something like a map.??????? what the hell was that supposed to show me, LOL

Edited by modo82
missed somthing out
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who actually does the disposal? Biffa and Veolia normally charge for a lift as long as it bin isnt overloaded rather tha by weight. many of the bins have RF chips to identify them when they are lifted and weighed by the lorry so you could start off by asking about the RFID of the bn and who normally has that bin as you dispute the charge.

I also wonder why you are using a broker unless they are actually making youa saving by disposal by weight rather than per lift. You can have fortnightly lifts unless you have a lot of problems with putrescibles.

 

However, as you are a business once yoi ahve signed up to these third party bandits it is very difficult to get out of your contract even if it as crooked as hell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So should i just Stand my ground and what do you think chances are of this going to magistrates court as they keep threatening. baring in mind im still paying for there service so they are making money from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, bit Biffa will lift fortnightly if you dont warrant a weekly collection. For some types of waste they will lift on request as long as it is a minimum number of collections a year.

Ericsbrother - thank for the advice, actually the brooker seemed to be cheaper. Its biffa who actually lift the bins i will actually ask about the RFID.
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So should i just Stand my ground and what do you think chances are of this going to magistrates court as they keep threatening. baring in mind im still paying for there service so they are making money from me.

 

 

 

Whether you decide to pay or not is your decision. It will not be Magistrates Court should they decide to go ahead if you decide not to pay - it will be a claim in the County Court.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

speak to Biffa about getting a new contract and then see waht you need to do to get out of this one regarding notice period etc.

you have to start being proactive if you want to resolve this, telling the brokers you are off may well make them change their tune

Link to post
Share on other sites

quick update guys

 

wrote them letter stating i will be filing a defence if they decided to take it further also stated what grounds im filing defence on.

 

now they have "AS A GOOD WILL GESTURE:roll:" credited me back the charges.

 

so good result. thank you for all the advice guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done ...thread title amended.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...