Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry - Yes they are enforcing for credit card debts so scrub HCEOs off the options moving forward.

 

Most of my debts are like this I have 4 catalogue debts and 2 credit card debts....does it make a difference in enforcement???

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only execute one debt/judgment per Warrant...lets stick to the one debt for this thread in question.

 

Tell us about the 2 debts and judgments listed...dates..etc.

 

If you could possibly scan a copy of this Notice of Removal (redacted) that would be helpful....as it sounds invalid if it refers to your wife's debts on the same notice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of my debts are like this I have 4 catalogue debts and 2 credit card debts....does it make a difference in enforcement???

 

As I have already mentioned, none of the debts can be transferred to the High Court. If the county court bailiff is unable to obtain payment, Lowells could if they wish make an application to have the debt deducted from your salary.

 

What needs to be done here (and I apologise for repeating myself) is that you need to speak to a debt charity (National Debt Line, Stepchange, CAB etc) and seek help. I am still of the view that a very simple Debt Relief Order would be appropriate for you and indeed your wife.

Link to post
Share on other sites

start a new thread for the other debts .

we'll help you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Continue your discussion here......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?479121-Threatening-County-Court-Bailiffs..can-they-force-entry-into-a-residential-property

 

Recent posts which are of no value to the OP in dealing with the Warrant moved to the above thread

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

im sorry if I seem to be asking the same question again

 

I've hardly slept the last couple of days worrying about this but the bailiff can't turn up next week with a locksmith and the police and take what little we have can they ???

 

I've read of stories of the police making people let the bailiffs in even when they don't have too and I don't want that happening to me ...

 

I am going to try and get an appointment with the citizens advice today to apply for a DRO but I think the last time I went there I had to wait about 3 weeks to see someone...

 

Thanks everyone for your help and advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are repeating yourself. Please forget about the idea of a locksmith.

 

Have you called the bailiff to inform him of your intention to contact a debt charity and hopefully apply for a Debt Relief Order?

It is very important that you do so.....today.

 

Failure to contact the bailiff will lead him to consider that you are a debtor who is wilfully refusing to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be quicker and easier to contact the debt charity Stepchange.

 

If you qualify for a DRO, they can sort that out for you.

 

The trouble with Citizens Advice is that they are not funded sufficiently and can't offer the service.

 

https://www.stepchange.org/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that a DRO will cost you £90 and takes weeks to process..time you can ill afford it would be helpful if you could respond to may last post # 33 ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the DRO!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that a DRO will cost you £90 and takes weeks to process..time you can ill afford it would be helpful if you could respond to may last post # 33 ?

 

Andy

 

I don't know how can i do this without revealing too much info as what you want to see is just hand written names ,my wifes and mine, and both case numbers, both of which would reveal too much info???

 

Its literally a standard removal/take notice with our local county courts address on it with the bailiffs/enforcement officer's name and phone number at the bottom.

 

 

Handwritten at the top is my wife's name and case number then mine underneath and in a space between paragraphs is another handwritten note saying locksmith £250...

Link to post
Share on other sites

millstone around you neck that probably doesn't need to be there

you need to research the other debts that are making you think this is a good idea first.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

millstone around you neck that probably doesn't need to be there

you need to research the other debts that are making you think this is a good idea first.

 

I'd be looking at enforceability of each debt. Why have a DRO if the debt cannot be enforced?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how can i do this without revealing too much info as what you want to see is just hand written names ,my wifes and mine, and both case numbers, both of which would reveal too much info???

 

Its literally a standard removal/take notice with our local county courts address on it with the bailiffs/enforcement officer's name and phone number at the bottom.

 

 

Handwritten at the top is my wife's name and case number then mine underneath and in a space between paragraphs is another handwritten note saying locksmith £250...

 

Its more the form and how they have listed 2 judgments/Debtors on the same Warrant that I am interested to see..you can cover your names and judgment claim numbers...leave the amounts and any other details regarding the judgments

 

This is the form that the creditor uses to request the Warrant of Control...the N323

 

https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/PDFForms/N323.pdf

 

As you can see only 1 judgment can be listed...so only 1 claim number can be used...you cant list 2 different judgments on the application form.

 

Is there an N number on your form...bottom left?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its more the form and how they have listed 2 judgments/Debtors on the same Warrant that I am interested to see..you can cover your names and judgment claim numbers...leave the amounts and any other details regarding the judgments

 

This is the form that the creditor uses to request the Warrant of Control...the N323

 

https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/PDFForms/N323.pdf

 

As you can see only 1 judgment can be listed...so only 1 claim number can be used...you cant list 2 different judgments on the application form.

 

Is there an N number on your form...bottom left?

 

Andy

 

No there's no n number on the letter .... would it make a difference because it's a welsh court ???

 

millstone around you neck that probably doesn't need to be there

you need to research the other debts that are making you think this is a good idea first.

 

In total with all our debts combined It's about 15k and we have no way of paying it off... so the DRO sounded a good idea

 

Just a thought but...have you checked to see if any of your debts could be SB?

 

They're all from around the same time about 4 years so I don't think any are statute barred.... I haven't heard anything about them for years then suddenly the court papers started turning up ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

In total with all our debts combined It's about 15k and we have no way of paying it off... so the DRO sounded a good idea

 

Have you actually picked up the phone to talk to a company like Stepchange about this ?

 

If not, why don't you do so this morning.

Get the ball rolling.

 

Then phone the court bailiff to advise them you are trying to deal with it and have spoken to Stepchange.

This court bailiff knows nothing of your situation.

For all they know, you are sitting on money, have plenty of expensive goods and are not bothered about the debts.

 

And then in addition, you can find out about the issues Andy has raised.

Ask the court bailiff what applications the creditor has made and what court they were submitted to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi All

 

I've been getting chased by lowell for a couple of credit card debts from 5 years ago and they've issued a couple of CCJ's against me.

 

They instructed a court bailiff to come to my address and act on a warrant of control for my goods but i was never in when he called.

 

One lunchtime he caught me coming home and i explained my situation to him,

told him that he was chasing a small part of 20-30 grand worth of debt and there was no way i was ever letting him in...

 

He also accepted that i had no way of paying off my debts as i live in a council house with no assets so he said he wouldnt be back and that he'd refer it back to lowell's...

 

They must have instructed a new Bailiff as we started getting hand delivered letters off a woman instead but i never actually met her as she never came when we were home

 

the last letter we had off her was one saying she was coming back to remove levied goods,

as she had never gained access to my house i just ignored it as it was obviously just another threat.

 

Now we've received a letter from Lowell headed failure/aborted warrant of control and i was wondering what this actually meant as I've never come across this before???

 

Does this mean they'll have to go back to court and try again or have they dropped it??

 

I know they've just sent me another pre court letter for another part of my old debts,

a year before i would have been statute barred.....

 

You would think they'd realize that if i cant pay the first few what hope do they have of pursuing more ??

 

Anyway thanks for any help given ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I gather these were court bailiffs as they cant use HCEO's on regulated consumer debt

tough for lowells then :-)

 

tell us about the CCJ

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I've been getting chased by lowell for a couple of credit card debts from 5 years ago and they've issued a couple of CCJ's against me.

 

They instructed a court bailiff to come to my address and act on a warrant of control for my goods but i was never in when he called.

 

One lunchtime he caught me coming home and i explained my situation to him,

told him that he was chasing a small part of 20-30 grand worth of debt and there was no way i was ever letting him in...

 

He also accepted that i had no way of paying off my debts as i live in a council house with no assets so he said he wouldnt be back and that he'd refer it back to lowell's...

 

They must have instructed a new Bailiff as we started getting hand delivered letters off a woman instead but i never actually met her as she never came when we were home

 

the last letter we had off her was one saying she was coming back to remove levied goods,

as she had never gained access to my house i just ignored it as it was obviously just another threat.

 

Now we've received a letter from Lowell headed failure/aborted warrant of control and i was wondering what this actually meant as I've never come across this before???

 

Does this mean they'll have to go back to court and try again or have they dropped it??

 

I know they've just sent me another pre court letter for another part of my old debts,

a year before i would have been statute barred.....

 

You would think they'd realize that if i cant pay the first few what hope do they have of pursuing more ??

 

Anyway thanks for any help given ...

 

It means the warrant was probably issued to a court bailiff, and after hearing your explanation he decided that the debt was uncollectable and so returned the warrant to the court. County court bailiffs are generally more likely to listen to reason than their private counterparts.

 

I wouldn't mind betting the second visit you received was from a Lowell agent.

 

The CCJ still stands and the creditor have the option to enforce via another warrant if they wish, however I think it unlikely.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...