Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Business Internet Company claimform - suing for cancelling contract***Struck Out***


maggie60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

before 4 I think you'll find they close at 4

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending off 11 pages by first class recorded delivery today. Emailing claimant copies at 3.30pm Thursday.

 

 

Can I, on behalf on the defendant, check on Friday morning whether the claimant has paid the £80 fee and filed a witness statement?

 

 

If they haven't OR have failed to provide the defendants copies of their witness statement, what is the correct procedure to request it be struck out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell the court they've failed to comply

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All docs (12 [pages) received by the court a day early today.

 

 

Sending the claimant his copies by email tomorrow. Does it matter if the witness statement they receives is not signed - they are an IT company and I know how easy it is to copy signatures plus it saves the defendant scanning the WS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No ...as long as the courts copies are signed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opening hours

 

 

  • Court building open: Monday to Friday 8am to 5pm
  • County Court enquiries counter: 10am to 2pm

Email

 

Enquiries:

[email protected]

 

Children cases:

[email protected]

 

Bailiffs:

[email protected]

 

County Court listing:

[email protected]

 

Filing and records:

[email protected]

 

Witness service:

[email protected]

 

Small claims mediation:

[email protected]

 

Crown Court:

[email protected]

 

 

No sight of any witness statement YET.

 

 

If we receive nothing by 4pm, the court is open until 5pm. Can we email the enquiries and filing and records email addresses saying: "As the claimant has failed to provide us with a copy of their witness statements and other documents they intend to produce at the hearing within the court's deadline. can we kindly request that their claim be struck out."

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could but the court would most probably ignore...they do allow a little leniency...I would allow at least a week.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either as long as it gets the attention of the court....evidence must be filed and served...if they fail they are not allowed to rely on any written evidence and may be ordered to only give verbal evidence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Unless the Claimant does by 4.00pm on the 1/2/2018 pay to the court the trial fee of £80.00 or file a properly completed application (i.e one which provides all the required information in the manner requested) for help with fees, then the claim [counterclaim] will be struck out with effect from 1/2/18 without further order/and, unless the court orders otherwise, you will also be liable for the costs which the defendant has incurred."

 

 

We have heard nothing from the claimant and I am hoping they did not file any paperwork or pay the fee.

 

The above paragraph it will now be struck out. Is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes...but you need to check to see if they have paid or not...if the court confirms not then ask them to strike out as per the court directions dated xxxxxxxx

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be struck out:

a) if they haven’t complied (if they complied, but it is that the court’s correspondence hasn’t yet been reviewed, they won’t be penalised for that)

b) if they also haven’t complied by when the court reviews it (if they have complied by then, it is at the judge’s discretion of what is ‘just’).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave the court a ring and it appears they haven’t received anything from Shine yet, but they have had problems with their card machine and won’t know if Shine have paid the hearing fee until the middle of next week.

 

The order states that if the claimant fails to pay the fee, the claim will be struck out and the claimants will be liable for any costs that the defendant has incurred.

 

What would be reasonable costs that the defendant can claim for, if any?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The order states that if the claimant fails to pay the fee, the claim will be struck out and the claimants will be liable for any costs that the defendant has incurred. What would be reasonable costs that the defendant can claim for, if any?

 

I don’t know, since only you know what costs you’ve incurred....

 

Examples to consider include:

Your time (at the litigant in person rate, for time reasonably spent),

Did you have to pay to make any applications to the court?,

Postage / stationery costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Honeybee, you are correct, shame barristers aren't capped at that rate.

 

 

Signed for post etc. are around £5, but I have spent 30 hours+ on research, preparing emails, defences, evidenceetc for this and not even a bottle of Lidl wine from the defendant. Can they claim 20 of these hours x £19 per hour for me? Or would this appear unreasonably long?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Checked with the court and claimant's "bundle" was received on 31 January, but still nothing received by the defendant. Court says we should email and request directions from the judge.

 

 

Can anyone recommend the correct wording for this request?

 

 

Also, when requesting the court etc. we were asked to forward a copy to the claimant, but they did not reciprocate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Honeybee, you are correct, shame barristers aren't capped at that rate.

 

Signed for post etc. are around £5, but I have spent 30 hours+ on research, preparing emails, defences, evidenceetc for this and not even a bottle of Lidl wine from the defendant. Can they claim 20 of these hours x £19 per hour for me? Or would this appear unreasonably long?

 

Claim what you want. When it comes to costs, if you don't ask you don't get. All you can do is submit a schedule (the best format is Court Form N260), make sure you send it to the other side and to the Court no less than 3 days before the hearing.

 

But bear in mind this is on the small claims track, so ordinarily as the Defendant no costs will be awarded to you even if you're successful, unless you can show the Claimant's conduct was unreasonable during the litigation. Even then it's heavily at the discretion of the Judge. So have they been unreasonable in any way?

 

If you win, the Defendant is usually able to recover reasonable travel expenses or loss of earnings for attending the hearing.

 

My suggestion - ask but don't expect to receive anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And regarding the Claimant's evidence, the trial is in March. I would suggest writing to the Claimant first (ideally by email) and asking them to send their witness statement and documents as you have not received this (and therefore they have breached the Court order? - is that correct?). Tell them you'll give them till the end of the week to email these across, after which you will be writing to the Court.

 

What does the Directions Order say word for word about exchanging witness statements? Usually it'll say something like the parties will send to each other and to the Court, all documents upon which they wish to rely, on a specified date. Then it'll go on to say those documents should include witness statements. And then something about if a witness statement isn't served in accordance with the order, the witness may not be permitted to give oral evidence in Court. The last bit is crucial.

 

So if you don't get them from the other side by the end of the week, write to the Court, but I personally wouldn't request further directions. I would just inform the Court that the Claimant has not served its witness evidence on the Defendant and that they have breached the Court order, and should not be permitted to give oral evidence. And send a copy of that to the Claimant.

 

If you ask the Court to make further directions (which would presumably give them a new deadline to send you the statements/documents), you're just giving the Claimant a free pass on breaching the Court order.

 

That's my view at least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, please see attachments of the court order.

 

I see your point about giving them the opportunity to defer the date,

 

but the defendants have already emailed the court to say the claimant hadn't complied with instructions and asked for their instructions.

shine 2a.jpg

court points.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they write to the Claimant, regarding their non-compliance? I mean with the best will in the world the postal system is not infallible. I've had documents go missing etc. The Claimant might well be under the impression all is fine, and it's been sent (as you know the Court have received it so the likelihood that they purposefully did not send it to the Defendant is low).

 

Realistically, the only potential prejudice the Defendant could suffer at this stage is that the other side sees their witness statement and uses it to draft their own. But the other side's documents were with the court on 31st so that is unlikely to have happened. Obviously as you get closer to the trial, you have less time to examine the Claimant's evidence and less time to prepare things like questions/cross examination etc.

 

With the trial in March, I think you would look very reasonable to the Judge hearing the case if you gave them an opportunity to send the documents to you. Then, if after this you still haven't received them, the Defendant will ask the Judge not to consider the Claimant's witness evidence as it hasn't been served in accordance with Paragraph 3© of the Directions order, and despite a further request to serve.

 

If you write to Court asking for further directions, the Judge will likely order a new date for the Claimant to serve the documents (as they have been filed at Court). A Judge is unlikely to strike out the Claimant's witness evidence. They'll likely comply with this Order to serve again. Depending when the Judge gets round to looking at it, the trial date may be moved back to allow you time to consider the papers after the new date of service.

 

So tactically, in my view the better option is to give them an opportunity to send it again. If they do within the time you set (give them till say 4pm Monday), you're not at a disadvantage. Failing this just raise it at Court and the Judge will deal how they sees fit. They may use their discretion to strike out the witness evidence, they may adjourn the hearing to another date, they may just let it slide and adjourn for an hour or so on the morning for you to go through it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...