Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I was advised to ignore the paploc by a solicitors who said it was a fishing excercise and to answer them would be removing a big weapon in defeating that of time and demanding information within certain limits. im no lawyer so dont know if that makes sense or does not.
    • We’ve all ignored and I know people who’ve been back for years longer and always ignored and nothing has ever come of it 
    • I received several letters from J&P which were just ignored, but now I've received the same paploc Eve appears to have. As it stands, I'm looking to complete & reply as per the oft-referenced thread #5. After reading a few comments about ignoring and nothing progressing from J&P side, I'm intrigued whether they were just general 'please contact us type letters' or letters of claim/paplocs?  I realise for some it's a personal decision or based on advice, but given advice on here is not to ignore paplocs, what was the reasoning to ignore? 
    • Afternoon All. I have today received a court order requiring me to send them more details before 16:00 on 8 July. A copy of the order is attached, but the relevant paras seem to be: 2 Send all of the documents that are relevant to your case to the court at the above address, also send them to the other side. Both parties must do this. These documents should be placed in date order and should be numbered in the bottom right hand corner. You should include the following documents if available: •       A copy of the contract/agreement •       Relevant correspondence, including text messages and emails  Photographs Before 4pm 08 July 2024 3 Send to the court and send to the other party your own witness statement and also witness statements from anyone who can give relevant evidence about your case. Both parties must do this. A witness statement must •       have the court case number at the top •       start with the witness’ name and address •       it must contain numbered paragraphs and should be typed and double spaced. If not typed, it must be written clearly in block capitals or printed. •       finish with the words “I believe the facts set out above to be true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth”, the date of the statement and the person’s signature. The original statement must be sent to the court and copies must be sent to the other side. Before 4pm 08 July 2024 I'm a little confused by para 7 in the order : Because this order has been made by a Legal Adviser without a hearing, you have the right to request that the decision of the Legal Adviser be reconsidered by a District Judge. Any request must be sent to the court to arrive by 4PM 12 June 2024. The request may be made in your online account, by email or on paper. The request must include an explanation of why the reconsideration is sought. Is this normal? Do I have to do anything with this by 12 June? As ever, many thanks    527MC352-claim-direction-order (anonymised).pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

build your credit rating up for free


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6289 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i am with helifax and even tho i have got my charges back, my rating was poor so i needed to build it up, i had an idea, so to test it i asked for an overdraft and got a flat "no2 with a curled lip.....so i started to pay my wages in as usual and though, what would happen if i withdrew it from the barclays opposit and put it BACK into my account straight away, so i did and did so for the nest 16 weeks, it was all my money, just basically paid my dosh in twice, then went in after the 16 weeks and reaplied for an overdraft, they said as i had doubled the money going thru my account, (even tho it was withdrawn once and paid in twice) i was offered a £500 overdraft, which i have refused cos i am just building my rating up, so a few more months of this and it will be better, so there you go, a simple way to do it

TOTALLY debt free as of 2007, Fantastic,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha, nice technique! I have often wondered if doing this would allow you to open one of those accounts where they insist you pay in at least £2500 a month or so. Just by double-depositing your wages :)

 

LOL!! I must confess I'd never thought of this method! "You learn summat new everyday"!!

 

I guess this could well work with First Direct when their new "£10 penalty for not paying in £1500 per month (unless you can afford a Deposit Account as well)" begins next year.

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha. Very good. Will have to try this one.

27th October: Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request

8th November: Letter received from HSBC - Statements to follow

9th November: Bank statements arrive

12th January: Preliminary Approach for Repayment

22nd January: Letter received from HSBC - they will be looking into matters raised

30th January: Letter Before Action sent

24th February: Letter received from HSBC (dated 6th February) offering £240

28th February: Claim issued via Money Claim Online for £326.28 (including 8% interest)

1st March: Letter to HSBC declining offer

5th March: Notice that Acknowledgement of Service has been filed

29th March: Notice of Transfer of Proceedings

25th April: Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track

15th June: Court Bundle sent to Court

25th June: Offer received from DG Sols.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have done this in the past, basically rinsing money through a variety of accounts, banks all use statisical analysis and one of their major indicators is the amount of money deposited monthly.

 

It can get you better rates, more offers etc and i have to recommend it, and with internet banking and moving money reasonably quickly (and maybe even quicker in near future) then it is a pretty easy technique.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this may work with whichever bank it is (First Direct I think) which is introducing the £10 charge for anyone with less than £1500 going through the account. If you are paid £1000, you withdraw it, you pay it back in, you then have £2000 going through the account. Even better in that it costs them to put the useless transactions through anyway.

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that all this just goes to prove that whatever wheeze the banks etc can dream up to make life difficult for their customers, there's always an antidote too!!

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep this does work have seen it before but the title of this thread is wrong, this does nothing for your credit rating, only for the rating of your bank account as seen by your bank. Nothing more. :)

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

But surely if the result is that you get an overdraft which you would otherwise not have been able to, this will improve your credit rating as all borrowings are shown on your credit report. You could then withdraw and pay in even more, ask for a higher overdraft etc. etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has no effect whatsoever on your credit score. What it does effect is your behavioural score. This is used internally within most banks when you request other products from them.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just come across this thread, WHAT IF?

You had 2 bank accounts with an overdraft of say £500 each and you just swapped the cash to each account once a month this would be classed as credit, wouldn't it? so therefore it would improve your RATING.

 

OR,

 

If you could manage to get 2 small loans for say £500 each for 12 months and pay each monthly payment with the other one etc (find the lowest flat rate you can) could this be a cheap way to improve your credit rating?

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just come across this thread, WHAT IF?

You had 2 bank accounts with an overdraft of say £500 each and you just swapped the cash to each account once a month this would be classed as credit, wouldn't it? so therefore it would improve your RATING.

 

OR,

 

If you could manage to get 2 small loans for say £500 each for 12 months and pay each monthly payment with the other one etc (find the lowest flat rate you can) could this be a cheap way to improve your credit rating?

:confused:

 

as the person said before- your first idea would only improve your rating with a particular organisation. and to your second point- if you can get a low rated loan then you should not need to improve your credit rating!!!

I've beat HSBC, GE Money and Abbey

 

Court pending V Barclays and Time Retail

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware, banks currently don't report on your bank accounts to the CRA's unless you default. However HSBC has indicated that it is going to start doing this as "it is their duty as a responsible lender to insure you do not get into to much debt"

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pff, and how precisely will that 'help' you stay out of debt? HSBC are eejits.

 

All the money owed on overdrafts, etc will be visable to anyone doing a credit search.

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fairly sure thats the case already

 

 

Nope, that's why people can have multiple cheque accounts with large overdrafts as the banks don't currently share this info with the CRA or each other.

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Equifax record has the current balance of my accounts with HSBC and Halifax and Alliance & Leicester, including overdraft amounts

HSBC

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3078

24th October - LBA

7th November - Claim filed

11th November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Defence filed

16th December 2006 - Offered full amount but no default removal. Rejection letter sent.

 

Halifax

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3427

24th October - LBA

3rd November - Offered £913

3rd November - Accepted as partial payment

7th November - Claim issued

21st November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Offered full amount but no late payment removal

4th January - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

 

A & L

19th October - Prelim for £540

26th October - Offered £358

2nd November - Accepted as partial payment and LBA

27th November - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Equifax record has the current balance of my accounts with HSBC and Halifax and Alliance & Leicester, including overdraft amounts

 

 

My accounts don't show up. That means some banks do and others don't. Have you agreed to them sharing your data?

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you agreed to them sharing your data?

It's in the standard terms and conditions

HSBC

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3078

24th October - LBA

7th November - Claim filed

11th November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Defence filed

16th December 2006 - Offered full amount but no default removal. Rejection letter sent.

 

Halifax

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3427

24th October - LBA

3rd November - Offered £913

3rd November - Accepted as partial payment

7th November - Claim issued

21st November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Offered full amount but no late payment removal

4th January - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

 

A & L

19th October - Prelim for £540

26th October - Offered £358

2nd November - Accepted as partial payment and LBA

27th November - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...