Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apparently some journalists have heard that Sunak may call an election next weekend or in the week following the bank holiday Monday. With the election to be held at the end of June. Rishi Sunak could call snap general election | Politics | News | Express.co.uk WWW.EXPRESS.CO.UK Here's why the Prime Minister could announce a general election soon  
    • Found a BMA article related to this subject which I think the OP will find helpful. Patients recording consultations WWW.BMA.ORG.UK Our guidance answers if patients can record doctors without permission or covertly, how to respond when a patient asks to record their appointment and what to do if a covert recording is posted online.  
    • Ah - that was another thread that got merged back in 2018   That 'split' doesnt refer to this legal matter  
    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bought Misleading Online Course Based In USA


pacmanman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It's telling me it has to be an english address when I try to enter it into the moneyclaim form online though?

 

I did get a response from tesco bank and they gave me a newcastle address but said it would be forwarded to the scotland one so I am wondering if thats ok or I should definitely make sure its the scotland one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the one?

 

Tesco Bank

Q8 Building

Quorum Business Park

Longbenton

Newcastle upon Tyne

NE12 8BU

 

If so, that'll do as even the "customer service centre" is part of the TB group. Once you issue a claim, expect someone at Tesco to sit up and take notice fairly quickly. As I said, I doubt that they'll want to throw any money at this so will probably just settle.

 

Settling for the £600 will mean that you lose your £25 or whatever it is for issuing the claim, but you'll only be £25 down and not £600! :wink:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This Companies House Link: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/00445790

 

Confirms the above post is correct as it is Tesco Plc Registered Office Address and you also have there company number

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

They've written that my claim is without merit but are mindful of civil procedure rules which obliges parties to try and resolve where possible.

 

They've also written "This offer is made on a commercial basis with no admission of liability......If you do not accept this settlement offer we reserve the right to bring the contents of this letter to the attention of the court on the issue of costs. In the unlikely event that you succeed at trial but fail to be awarded more than this offer then we intend to seek an order requiring you to pay the Bank's costs, together with interest on those costs.

 

I thought that if you go by small claims that they can't claim for costs? Is this an empty threat?

 

They also wrote that the settlement will be subject to a Tomlin order to be agreed between the parties.

 

I have no idea what a Tomlin order is.

 

Not sure if it is worth pursuing the £60 but would be interested to hear perspective on this.

 

Thank you

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

They CAN ask for costs if they win. It is very unlikely they'd get them as:

 

a) you have to behave entirely unreasonably to have costs awarded against you in the small claims track, and you haven't

 

b) even then, costs are at the court's discretion, and if they've offered you the settlement sum (even without admitting liability), and that was what they could have offered you and what you were asking for prior to issuing the claim : you'd have settled if they'd done so, so to seek costs is unreasonable,

 

c) as this is the small claims track they can't use a Part 36 offer (as they can't do it, I wouldn't worry too much about it) but they are trying to add pressure as if they were making a part 36 offer, even though they know it is a bluff.

 

A Tomlin order is also known as a consent order. It means the case gets stayed as long as the parties stick to the agreement. That way it doesn't ever get to trial, so expect them to ask for a confidentiality clause (whereas if it goes to trial the facts and verdict become a matter of public record........)

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

For £600 they'll probably just settle it without a fight to be honest, it would cost them more to defend than the claim is worth.

 

I wonder if I can do the same with tonight's Lottery numbers :lol:

 

 

To be perfectly honest, if all you've lost is £60, that's a hell of a lot better than £600. I'm not sure that it's worth the bother of continuing. Don't get me wrong, I think you'd probably win, but is it worth the trouble?

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the insight.

 

I have decided to accept. It has been nearly a year now dragging this out so I will just go with it. I think I would have pushed for the 60 when I was younger..but I consider this a win without having to push for it.

 

Thanks agian everyone - very much appreciated the responses and insight. I will know how to handle this and hopefully more swiftly if anything like this ever happens again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...