Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CRS/ Harlands - Exercise4Less Gym Membership


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2754 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Its my first time posting on here so bear with me. Iv seen a few different posts about this already but thought I would start a new one to see peoples thoughts.

 

I signed up to exercise4less earlier in the year as I was working very near to one. (I work away from home for long periods of time).

 

I signed up to the £14.99 monthly subscription instead of the £9.99 12 month one.

And I explained when signing up I was a contractor working in the area and would only be around for a couple of months at most.

 

I set up the direct debit and attended the gym for a couple of months as agreed, until I got finished from where I was working.

 

Before I got finished I told them in the gym I would be leaving within a matter of weeks and wouldn’t be coming back for the foreseeable future. (Unfortunately I have nothing in writing or anything to proof this).

 

I have since been working somewhere else and have rarely been home.

However when I have been back I have found letters from Harlands saying I have missed a direct debit and then from CRS saying they have been passed my debt and are looking for £180 to settle it.

Also said I only have 7 days to respond, which had already past by time I got home.

 

From what I understand CRS and Harlands are the same people?

And any charges they add on are both unlawful and don’t need to be paid?

 

Im not intending on paying them a penny as iv not used the gym so I refuse to pay anything for it.

 

What I would like to know is how I can make this go away?

If I just ignore it will they finally give in or am I better off writing to them and if so what do I say?

 

They have also started phoning and texting me saying I must contact them?

 

Thanks in advance for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bully... First Post? :p You have 5 xd

 

Just kidding. :) Welcome back to CAG.

 

So how did you notify them about leaving? Verbal Or Writing?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read their reviews on line. It appears not to matter whether you had a contract or not, they just keep debiting your account.

 

 

It also appears that if you miss a payment there is a £25 charge!

 

My opinion is that the charge is a penalty that they would have no hope of recovering in Court so they will never take you to Court. No doubt other who post after will confirm.

 

It is a pity that you did not inform them in writing that you were cancelling since I would have thought that was in their T&Cs.

This would have given you more legitimacy but their outrageous penalties scupper their chances of getting any legal redress.

 

 

I take it that as they are chasing you for £180 that you have cancelled your direct debit and asked your bank to refund

any charges that the gym levied on your account before you cancelled.

 

As far as texts and phone calls are concerned you could block their number on your phone as well as complain that you are being harassed by them to your local Trading Standards office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite honestly I don't think you owe anything.

 

they cant harm you nor you credit file

so if you wish

you are safe to ignore them

 

else you could send one of slick132's letters

to buff them away.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of their puerile text messages should be forwarded to 7726 (spam) on your keypad.

 

As for their phone calls, keep a diary of events, and simply laugh at them down the phone.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi again.

 

iv been working away for a while now but managed to visit home this week.

 

there was another 2 letters waiting for me from CRS

 

the first on threatening legal action and issuing proceedings against me in county court

 

the 2nd saying my account balance being passed to Zinc Group Ltd "one of the UK's leading providers of debt recovery solutions"

 

what should i do to put an end to this? I'm still receiving numerous calls from random numbers but I'm currently working nights so i miss them all anyway?

 

am i best sending a letter into them?

 

Is there some sort of template http dx100uk you mentioned slick123?

 

thanks very much

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ignore it

that will end it.

 

 

don't forget

a DCA is not a bailiff

and have

no such legal powers

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unenforceable debts often get passed around between DCA, none of them have any power over you and you should ignore everything from a DCA except a court letter/summons. If a DCA turns up on your doorstep tell them to leave and do not give any information, do not even confirm or deny who you are, shut the door, do not get involved in any dialogue. If they stand there and shout call the Police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks.

 

is there not something i can do to make this just go away.

 

i work away and don't particularly want anyone coming to the door when I'm not there?

 

also getting sick of the calls and texts

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

we've never heard of any gym debt resulting in a no powers doorstepper DCA appearing.

and the lasttime any of the gym lot did court was in 2012.

 

 

the best way to make it go away now I feel is to continue the ignore route

I notice our team expert slick132 has not seen this thread

I might well alert him for you.

 

 

 

 

might be an idea to pop up some dates for him...

 

 

date you joined

date you told them you wanted to end it by whatever method

date of last DD paid

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the exact date i joined. it was mid to late January this year though. i told them when i signed up it would only be for a couple of months

 

I left in march and told the receptionist i would be doing so, although i received no confirmation she just said ok.

 

the final DD came out the 24/03/2016. (well after i stopped using the gym)

 

hopefully can get something sorted because the phone calls are getting more and more frequent. (i don't answer them but still annoying)

 

thanks very much

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is harassing you over the phone? Have you been keeping a diary of events/phonecalls?

 

The gym is ultimately responsible for the actions of their third parties, so they will be the ones answering the courts for the criminal offence of harassment.

However!

 

They know that this won't happen, so continue to commit said criminal offence..

 

''IF'' you feel you need to send anything, then you 'could' send whichever powerless clown outfit the telephone harassment letter, and if they then choose to continue, you 'could' report them to the police for the criminal offence.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387367-Harassment-by-Telephone-**Update-21st-April-2014**

 

All they will say in their defence is that you were ignoring their puerile missives, so they were attempting to contact you by other means.

 

IMO, continue ignoring them, there is absolutely nothing they can do, nor will they ever.

 

If you like, and want to bait them a little, then answer and laugh at them before hanging up.

 

It is the gym who are the ones who need to be made to answer for this, so embarrass them on social media, expose them and the way they treat their customers on FB and twitter.

 

You're almost at the end of the line with these fools now, so don't give up, if you've documented all their harassment, then expose it on social media, and pose the question as to whether they think this is anyway to treat a customer?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi, me again. i decided to ignore all forms of contact from the company/ companies that were pressuring the "debt" and i thought it may have finally gone away.

 

Today however i have received a letter from Spratt Endicott Solicitors.

 

the letter has the usual content saying they are acting on behalf of the named client (Exercise4Less)

Failure to respond within 7 days may result in legal proceedings

"any claim resulting in proceedings will include additional costs payable to you. you should also note that if a judgement is obtained you may find it difficult to obtain credit from other sources as the judgement will be registered and remain on your file for 6 years"

 

there is no name on the bottom of the leter and it is signed yours faithfully Spratt Endicott

 

Is this just another front trying to scare people into making the payment? or is this the claim being escalated. The letter seems to be worded in a way that makes me think its not legit, just because of how its says may result in...

 

Id love this just to go away for good. unfortunately ignoring it hasn't seemed to work yet

 

thanks in advance for any help or further advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

same lot

different desk with a bloke in a different coloured skirt on.

using a different letterhead in the same printer

 

 

ignore the fake/tame solicitors

no powers a t all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...