Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can employer ban smoking outside????


poppynurse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My employer is bringing in a total ban on smoking. We are not even going to be allowed to smoke in our own vehicles in the car park. They have said we can change out of uniform, walk up to the public highway, have a cig, come back and change again - all in 15 minutes??? Up to now we have been able to smoke outside in the fresh air but on the premises.

 

Is this complete ban legal (particularly in my own vehicle). I know smoking is bad for me but what harm am I doing anyone else out in the fresh air! Further it is custom and practice for us to be 'on-call' during our breaks and I work 13 1/2 hr shifts........can't go that long without a fag!

 

Is there anything we can do about this?

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think they can force you to change out of your uniform, but they are quite entitled to make you leave the premises completely and go on to the public highway.

 

Now might be a good time to quit smoking if this is an otion you have previously considered. You can get free help and support from the NHS. Just a thought.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry to say but I think that's a great idea - my old employer used to do the same. We had to walk away from the building and didn't have long at all.

 

Hopefully people will be able to cut down altogether - I am a smoker btw, and I HATE it. It's depressing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep trying to give up but failing. And it is the NHS I work for! I used their smoking service but the lady kept forgetting to turn up so I started smoking again :(

Can they stop me smoking in my car?

And there is an expectation that we will either not have a break or be available to come back at a moments notice if things 'hot up' - not sure how they are going to get hold of me if I'm stood on the main road!!

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they stop me smoking in my car?

 

If you are parked on their property, yes.

 

And there is an expectation that we will either not have a break or be available to come back at a moments notice if things 'hot up' - not sure how they are going to get hold of me if I'm stood on the main road!!

 

If you are working 13 hour shifts you need to have regular, uninterrupted breaks. If this is not happening then you need to speak to your union rep.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah speak to Unison or your own union. They can stop you smoking in your uniform as a hygiene thing. Depends on what department you work for. And they can ban you from smoking on their premises also so these combined I would say they can do as they are doing. However as a smoker myself this is real unfair and they are not being sympathetic to your habit etc.

Seriously speak to the union . Dont the patients (cleints) have a smoke room or smoke sheds etc ? If so surely you can take uniform off and go there in break.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can stop you smoking in your uniform as a hygiene thing.

 

But how could they prove it if she is off premises? If she is a smoker and smokes in her house, her uniform will more than likely smell of tobacco anyway - there is no way of proving that she was actually wearing the uniform whilst she was smoking.

 

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

christmasrallycag_468x60.gif

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work in critical care so having a fag is a way of releasing the pressure so to speak.

Patients/relatives are also being banned from smoking completely from December 1st.

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But how could they prove it if she is off premises? If she is a smoker and smokes in her house, her uniform will more than likely smell of tobacco anyway - there is no way of proving that she was actually wearing the uniform whilst she was smoking.

 

Only time they could do this is when the uniform is to be kept on site and then not allowed out in uniform anyway. Such as working in theatre etc or my bro in law works in a food factory etc.

 

I work in critical care so having a fag is a way of releasing the pressure so to speak.

Patients/relatives are also being banned from smoking completely from December 1st.

 

This is really bad, I know when I worked for the NHS in mental health we used to encourage clients to smoke (if they were a smoker) to calm them down and relax.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But how could they prove it if she is off premises? If she is a smoker and smokes in her house, her uniform will more than likely smell of tobacco anyway - there is no way of proving that she was actually wearing the uniform whilst she was smoking.

 

Presumably if someone is seen smoking in uniform.

 

My company doesn't even allow smoking in company cars - wherever they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the none smoking in uniform comes under them classing it as causing bed views to there company and if they dont want a habit that kills being connected to there company or for any other reason then they can do it.

 

They would say ,you dont care about your apperance.

 

The companies that are hot on it now are holiday companies.

 

Was this the terms in your contract when you joined, i dont know if you can refuse on those grounds.

 

BL:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The smoking in uniform is prohibited because you are likely to contaminate your uniform with small particles of your saliva from the smoke all around you. Simular rules apply in areas where Food Hygiene laws are in place. Prevents Cross Contamination to other people,especially people in Hospital.

 

Uk...

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The age old debate - smokers vs non-smokers.

 

There are so many of these going round, people are getting more and more confused. One of the most popular arguments is that smokers get more 'free time' than non smokers. However, in the majority, smoker's subconciously take shorter lunch breaks and guidance given to non smoker's is that once an hour (the average time from one cigarette to another) get up from your desk and go and make a cup of tea or have a walk round the building for 5 minutes. You don't want to? Ok, well then don't say you weren't given the chance!!

 

Do you think the above is rude, arrogant or unfair? It's actually not, and it's what a lot of HR departments are now advising, because it's getting closer and closer to someone being discriminated against and only a matter of time before a case like this ends up at a tribunal.

 

At the end of the day, no one has a legal right to smoke. If you go to a friends house, who doesn't smoke, you don't hang out the window to have a cigarette do you? Most people I know will either go outside a distance from the house or wait until they are on the way home.

 

However, employers cannot afford to have a riot of smokers angry with them; what if the MD or a director smokes? Shooting themselves in the foot!

 

My local hospital now has no smoking on the premises at all; however, if you are able to leave site, then they cannot stop you from smoking. But my advice would be is to (if you are allowed) to leave site, walk a short distance away, make sure your uniform is not visible (i.e. large coat or similar), have a smoke and go back to work. Making the effort to not smell like an ashtray is also showing you are proactive and trying to accomodate your employer's wishes. Carry some polo's or breath mints with you, and by wearing an overlayer you are preventing the smell from penetrating your uniform too much. A quick wash of the hands (as I'm sure you already do, working in the NHS?!?!) and you'll be good to go.

 

In conclusion, if they say no smoking on the premises, then there is no smoking on the premises. No getting round it, no unfairness and no legal obligation to let people smoke.

 

P.S. I am a smoker. :o

  • Haha 1

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work for BT and they have done it .... being an ex smoker I think its great ;o)

 

Joking aside BT have erected smoking shelters that look like bus shelters, yet people still do it by the entrances, which is horrible if you happen to walk by and get a whif of their smoke .. so face up to it ... smoking is nasty, if you want to smoke go somewhere that doesnt affect others ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well exactly, so people who have an habbit to smoke will go were they shouldnt. It is far better for companies to provide designated places so this does not happen.

 

Until about a year ago we had a very nice but smelly smoing room - now we have bto go outside and that is going to eb abnned soon.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me guess, you are from one of the Health Trust in Northen Manchester? Pennie Acult Trust I think? A pain for me too when working there.

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me guess, you are from one of the Health Trust in Northen Manchester? Pennie Acult Trust I think? A pain for me too when working there.

NO!!! Lincolnshire, looks like they're at it all over!

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

North East aswell, personally i think it's good, nothing worse than having to walk past 20 people puffing away around the door of the building.

 

Anyway, the latest from my lot:

 

Going smoke free

The trust has a responsibility to protect the health of its service users, staff and visitors and will become a smoke-free organisation on 1 January 2007.

All NHS organisations have made a commitment to be smoke free by the end of 2006. The reasons for doing this have been widely publicised across the country and the dangers of smoking and second hand smoking have been well documented.

Smoking is far more common in the field of mental health (almost three times higher than across the general population) and we have a responsibility to support our service users and our staff to stop smoking.

Being smoke free means that, as a principle, smoking will not be permitted in any of our buildings, grounds or vehicles. This applies to all staff, service users and anyone entering or visiting our premises.

There will be some limited exemptions to these regulations, for instance places that are classed as a person’s home and, in exceptional cases, where a person’s care plan allows them to smoke. In these instances, designated smoking areas will be provided (in the grounds, wherever possible). These arrangements are still being discussed locally at individual hospitals and units and will be in place by the end of December. We will also monitor and review the use of exemptions on an ongoing basis.

We will encourage and provide support to service users and staff who want to stop smoking. Service users will also be offered support to cope with the restrictions if they do not wish to stop smoking (this will include offering nicotine replacement therapy).

Information about the smoke free policy will be widely publicised both before and after 1 January 2007 to ensure that everyone entering our premises understands that we are a smoke free organisation:

Link to post
Share on other sites

North East aswell, personally i think it's good, nothing worse than having to walk past 20 people puffing away around the door of the building.

 

There is no need to walk past the 20 people if they would provide a smoking room.

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...