Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
    • If you're sat there wondering how to attract and retain young talent, look no further. Find out what young people want from employers.View the full article
    • Toyota has apologised for providing incorrect or manipulated data for safety certification tests.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Land Search failed to show up Traffic Order Proposal


Lucky7even
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My partner bought his bungalow end of 2013.

 

Prior to the purchase a Private Search of Local Land Charges was made.

 

We have concerns about the search because we received a letter recently from Hampshire County Council saying that they are install double yellow lines outside the front of the bungalow.

 

This has been called a Traffic Order proposal.

 

We objected to this immediately, the Council wont install a disabled parking bay outside the front of the bungalow claiming its too close to the junction, we disagree.

 

They wont allow us to park the car in the garden again claiming its too close to the junction.

 

Again we disagree.

 

If we had known about this before purchasing we would have pulled out.

 

We are a blue badge holder, and we feel the council is beyond uncooperative.

 

We have contact the local mp to see if she can help but to also find out exactly when the traffic order was approved.

 

We understand its been in the pipeline for years.

 

Surely this should have been picked up on the searches?

 

Can anyone please give any advice, we are distress by this as we wont have anywhere to park.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does parking in your garden have to do with the junction?

 

Aids can be installed if its a visability problem

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does parking in your garden have to do with the junction?

 

Aids can be installed if its a visability problem

 

Exactly my point.

 

Visability is not an issue either, but Council claim I cannot use the dropped kerb as its for pedestraian use only, its a double drop kerb.

 

I've been advised to get in touch with my local councillor, I've had an email from the mp's secretary and they are going to raise issues.

 

As its a double dropped kerb, its not an issue is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner bought his bungalow end of 2013.

 

Prior to the purchase a Private Search of Local Land Charges was made.

 

We have concerns about the search because we received a letter recently from Hampshire County Council saying that they are install double yellow lines outside the front of the bungalow.

 

This has been called a Traffic Order proposal.

 

We objected to this immediately, the Council wont install a disabled parking bay outside the front of the bungalow claiming its too close to the junction, we disagree.

 

They wont allow us to park the car in the garden again claiming its too close to the junction.

 

Again we disagree.

 

If we had known about this before purchasing we would have pulled out.

 

We are a blue badge holder, and we feel the council is beyond uncooperative.

 

We have contact the local mp to see if she can help but to also find out exactly when the traffic order was approved.

 

We understand its been in the pipeline for years.

 

Surely this should have been picked up on the searches?

 

Can anyone please give any advice, we are distress by this as we wont have anywhere to park.

 

Unfortunately it all depends on what type of planning it was.. If it was an "Outline" plan, then it wont show up on a search.

 

I had a similar problem when we purchased the property I now live in. It was purchased because of the land views we that we had all the correct searches were done to see if there were any building plans for the other side of the lane. About 18 months after moving in, a builder starts to build properties across the way from us - when checking with the Planning department we discovered that he had been given outline planning to build one bungalow a year on that side of the road, but it is only recorded once the plans are actually accepted ! 5 years of disruption later and I look out onto 5 copycat box like bungalows with no land view !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately it all depends on what type of planning it was.. If it was an "Outline" plan, then it wont show up on a search.

 

I had a similar problem when we purchased the property I now live in. It was purchased because of the land views we that we had all the correct searches were done to see if there were any building plans for the other side of the lane. About 18 months after moving in, a builder starts to build properties across the way from us - when checking with the Planning department we discovered that he had been given outline planning to build one bungalow a year on that side of the road, but it is only recorded once the plans are actually accepted ! 5 years of disruption later and I look out onto 5 copycat box like bungalows with no land view !!

 

I've looked at the Council's website under road traffic schemes and its not showing up.

 

This is why its so confusing because as it a proposal it should be on there but it isn't

 

Hopefully the local mp might shed some light on this for me xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately it all depends on what type of planning it was.. If it was an "Outline" plan, then it wont show up on a search.

 

I had a similar problem when we purchased the property I now live in. It was purchased because of the land views we that we had all the correct searches were done to see if there were any building plans for the other side of the lane. About 18 months after moving in, a builder starts to build properties across the way from us - when checking with the Planning department we discovered that he had been given outline planning to build one bungalow a year on that side of the road, but it is only recorded once the plans are actually accepted ! 5 years of disruption later and I look out onto 5 copycat box like bungalows with no land view !!

 

Sadly, there is no "right to a view" (though there is "right to light).

Even if there hadn't had been planning permission when you purchased you might not have been able to prevent p.permission being granted.

 

The only way to preserve a view is to own the land your view is over (or have owned it once and sold it with a restrictive covenant protecting the view)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand that, Bazza.. I think the point I was trying to make, similar to the OP's situation - had I been aware, I would not have purchased the property and looked for somewhere that might not have been so popular for a building site.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand that, Bazza.. I think the point I was trying to make, similar to the OP's situation - had I been aware, I would not have purchased the property and looked for somewhere that might not have been so popular for a building site.

 

Absolutely ..... Though with the pressure on land these days, it seems (unless you can buy a massive plot & sell the rest with a restrictive covenant) that the only guarantee is to buy ... Adjacent to a cliff top

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner bought his bungalow end of 2013.

 

Prior to the purchase a Private Search of Local Land Charges was made.

 

.

Assuming this included a CON29 form enquiry, this would only have shown waiting or loading restrictions that had been approved but not yet implemented. The key word here is 'approved.' It may well have been 'in the pipeline', in other words, a proposal. But councils propose plenty of things that never come to fruition ie approved

 

TBH, I doubt that approval of a DYL restriction would take nearly 2 years from approval to implementation.

 

In addition to your MP, I suggest you canvass support from your ward councillors to hopefully persuade the Council to change their mind.

 

The local rag would love a story headed 'Council trap disabled person in their own home'

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming this included a CON29 form enquiry, this would only have shown waiting or loading restrictions that had been approved but not yet implemented. The key word here is 'approved.' It may well have been 'in the pipeline', in other words, a proposal. But councils propose plenty of things that never come to fruition ie approved

 

TBH, I doubt that approval of a DYL restriction would take nearly 2 years from approval to implementation.

 

In addition to your MP, I suggest you canvass support from your ward councillors to hopefully persuade the Council to change their mind.

 

The local rag would love a story headed 'Council trap disabled person in their own home'

 

Thats what I aim to do Michael. Make the Council's life very difficult, basically they are preventing a disabled person from parking!!!

 

As for the local MP, they are going to find out when this scheme was approved, and why this is happening when we have received no individual complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...