Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ethical parking breach charge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2991 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I know there are lots of articles on here and other sites about this with conflicting information, and the laws have changed a bit in the last year but I was hoping for some help for where I stand.

Just moved into new flat and parked my Motorbike on some empty ground opposite so as not to use up any of the residents minimal street parking spaces. This morning I came out to find a Contractural Breach Charge on my seat (not stuck on). I looked around and EPM have put some signs up on the back wall but with no lighting and I couldn't see them when I got there last night. There are no bays marked out and no entrance or exit, it is just some empty land next to the side street and I was tucked up against a tree. The side street is council permit parking only between 9-6 Mon-Sat.

It appears the advice is no longer to ignore them but if it had been windy this morning, I wouldn't have even found the ticket.

It states it was observed for only 10 minutes and 9 seconds, colour not recorded, and the location is noted as a Solicitor's 2 streets away. Doesn't have my street name on it anywhere.

I know this is an invoice etc but I clearly did not accept entry to any contract by parking there as the sign proclaims.

What is the best course now, appeal to EPM then POPLA?

 

Thanks

Dom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the moment dont do anything as parking company has to wait 28 days to issue a notice to keeper and then only alloed another 28 days after that to do so otherwise no keeper liability (so NTK has to arrive between 29 and 56 dasys after the event). In the meanwhile see if you can find out who owns the land as I can see several different signs on the walls behind the hardstanding and some still mention clamping but I cant read them well enough to see if they are compliant. get a decent picture of the signs so we can offer an opinion on their legitimacy regarding the CoP for parking signs.

Lots to defeat these things on but always best to get all of the info to hand before responding to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, will do.

I know from reading the sign it just states it is managed by EPM. Nothing about ownership anywhere.

How can I upload the picture of the ticket? The insert image tile asks for a URL. Can I just upload a jPEG?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, a jpeg will come out too small. look at other postings or in the library to see how to upload images. Generally it is via an image hosting site.

The signs wont say who owns the land but it can only be either the large building behind or the houses opposite. If the latter then each and every landowner must give premission for EPL to act as their agents, not just the freeholder in the case of shared rights. Most leaseholders dont know this so go along with what they are told by their managing agent (and get ripped off to boot).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Made an anonymous call to a few companies in the area and the land is owned by neither the housing members or the building behind the sign.

The solicitors based two streets away with no direct access told me they own some parking spaces there but were surprised to hear their name was being used on tickets and, 'as far as they know' they receive no money from these.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As already said, wait for the NTK to arrive in the post. This must be between 29-56 days of the event.

 

 

This will be an easy win at POPLA (if it gets that far), on signage, lack of standing and most probably GPEOL.

 

 

They think by putting the word contractual on the ticket, it is a contractual charge. It is not.

 

 

They admit that by stating 'complying with terms and conditions' and then actually calling it ' breach charge', that it for breach of contract, so must represent a Genuine Pre Estimate Of Loss...

 

 

Which it does not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will lose because they wont be able to showa contract with landowner that assigns the right to make leagl claims in their own name. Your enquiry with solicitors proves that one so the land is not contiguous and they must have contracts for every square inch or no dice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again

 

So the Notice To Driver arrived yesterday.

The date on the letter is 23/3/15 - exactly 56 days from issue

The post mark on the envelope is 24/3/15 - 57 days from issue

And the letter arrived yesterday 26/3/15 - 59 days from issue

 

Do I need to respond as surely they have missed the deadline?

 

Cheers

Dom

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are too late. File away the letter and envelope and if they write again tell them that they were too late in contacting you for keeper liability and no further correspondence will be entered into, further demands will be treated as harassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

So the Notice To Driver arrived yesterday.

The date on the letter is 23/3/15 - exactly 56 days from issue

The post mark on the envelope is 24/3/15 - 57 days from issue

And the letter arrived yesterday 26/3/15 - 59 days from issue

 

Do I need to respond as surely they have missed the deadline?

 

Cheers

Dom

 

Are they claming keeper liability under schedule 4 of the POFA 2012?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

They have been in touch again.

I did send a letter (couldn't help myself, sorry) stating a few points about the area, and that they had left it too long to contact me and any further communication would be deemed as harassment.

They have said they issued correctly and are unable to cancel. £100 to be paid by 26/5/15, extra recovery costs to be added if late.

Should I make a POPLA appeal now or just ignore it? This should all be irrelevant right?

 

Thanks

Dom

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant go to POPLA as the time has passed. they wont do anything that can do them any favours and they know it.

The reason they have been back in touch is because you wrote to them and they now see you as a mug who may well pay up even though you know there is no reason to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just an update

They've been in touch again, with a similar letter. '28 days to pay' and all the usual.

My only issue is their sentence on passing it on to a debt recovery service if unpaid as I am in the middle of a mortgage application and don't need anything on my credit report.

Can they even do that considering there is no legal debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the debt collection agency, they've got less teeth than your average budgie.

 

It's a standard procedure in the 'let's see who we can fleece this week' stakes.

 

If a PPC were to follow every stage it would go something like this...

 

1. Ticket on the windscreen. (or ANPR capture).

1a. If a ticket on the windscreen, a Notice to Keeper between 29 and 56 days later.

1b. If ANPR a Notice to Keeper within 14 days.

 

2. Around 14 days after the NtK arrives, you'll get "Notice to Keeper - Reminder"

 

3. Around 14 days after 2, you'll get "Notice to Keeper - FINAL REMINDER"

 

When they realise that you're not playing ball...

 

4. Debt recovery letter (usually DR+) adding around £50 to the debt.

 

5. Debt recovery letter, reminder. Last chance to pay. At this stage it'll be about £160.

 

6. Debt recovery letter... We're warning you, we'll tell teacher to take you to court.

 

7. Debt recovery letter... OK, we'll give you one more chance, and we'll 'reduce' the price to around £120. If you don't pay us now, we're going to sulk. We'll also tell our paymasters that you've not buckled.

 

8. MAYBE.. A letter from a company called Zenith Collections. Another reduced payment offer, might be even less than #7. They're getting desperate to get some money out of you now. And you can tell.

 

9. If you're really unlucky, you'll get a Letter Before Action/Claim.

 

It's only at this point that you need to concern yourself, as they *might* issue a county court claim. I say might, because some, even at this point, are still busy trying to think of ways to get you to roll over and pay up.

 

 

You'll have to have gone through ALL of the stages above, plus them actually issuing a claim, taking you to court AND winning against you before you get a judgement, and then you have 14 days to pay (if you've lost) before that judgement is registered as a CCJ which could affect your credit rating.

 

Until you've been to court, lost and then not paid up, there is no legally enforceable debt that they can put on your credit file.

 

 

In the whole of 2014, Ethical Parking Management issued 16 (Sixteen) county court claims, so you're going to need to be mighty unlucky for them to actually bother. Every time they take someone to court, even if they win, they lose money biggrin.png

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt recovery is some twonk sending you a letter asking you to pay them a sum that is usually more than the original demand without any reason as to why it has gone up or what right they have to demand it. Ignore them, they cant do anything that your cat cant do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...