Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Absolute Locate aka Global Debt Recovery Limited


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a letter earlier this week from: Absolute Locate

Dear Mr x

We require your assistance to verify information on behalf of a client. This is part of an investigation we are currently conducting

Please contact ect ect

 

No, I have not responded, and don't intend too.

 

Letter states this registered office is for a Nat Bourner Huddersfeild HD2 1GN

CCL 579084 DPLN ZA019311

 

Having done some homework and looking on this group, they are not who they say they are

 

First off, the CCL 579084 is incorrect,

Consumer credit number 579084 is for a Natalie Alice Bunyer not Nat Bourner as stated in this letter

(She has married, but not changed the name) She also resides in Surrey not Huddersfeild

 

this information is therefore falsely registered and constitutes either fraud and or deception.

 

these people are in fact: Global Debt Recovery Limited

Milbourne House 66-70 Coombe Rd New Malden, Greater London KT3 4QW

 

I am assuming that their client will be: FV-1 INC of 25 CABOT SQUARE, CANARY WHARF, LONDON E14 4QA

 

if you take a look here at:

mylawer co uk - restriction of debt collectors

 

They have already broken the following guidelines

 

1 Those contacting debtors not making clear who they are, who they work for, what their role is, what the purpose of the contact is

2 Not informing the debtor when their case has been passed on to a different debt collector

3 Passing on debtor details to debt management companies without the debtors informed prior consent

i.e FV-1 INC will have passed any alleged debt onto Absolute Locate, who in turn will then pass that onto Global Debt Recovery Limited and all without my informed prior consent, add to that Absolute Locate is just a dummy office which IMO amounts to deception.

 

Adding to this, they would’ve already broken the Data Protection Act by passing my details on.

 

I will post more when I receive their first letter.

 

 

But as you can see from my tone,

I am not going to be messed with by idiots,

I will be going straight for the jugular ;)

 

Ps. If (big IF) there is a debt, if would’ve to be more than 8 years old or more, so Statue Barred.

Edited by InfoGeek
Link to post
Share on other sites

there might be better weapons under the new FCA CONC rules

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk

 

These will do nicely

 

(2) In such cases, a firm should in no way, either by act or omission, mislead a customer as to the enforceability of the agreement.

(3) In particular, a firm should not in such cases either threaten court action or other enforcement of the debt or imply that the debt is enforceable when it is not.

(4) The firm should, in any communication or request for payment in such cases, make clear to the customer that although the debt remains outstanding it is unenforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had dealings with muppets like this before, from a private parking company, when they stuck a 'Penalty Notice' on my car, and expected me to pay, and then passed me onto their debt collectors

They got very short thrift ;)

I have all the names, personal addresses, with pictures of houses and FB profiles for those at Global Debt Recovery

I am after all, hence the name: InfoGeek

Edited by InfoGeek
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had dealings with muppets like this before, from a private parking company, when they stuck a 'Penalty Notice' on my car, and expected me to pay, and then passed me onto their debt collectors

They got very short thrift ;)

I have all the names, personal addresses, with pictures of houses and FB profiles for those at Global Debt Recovery

I am after all, hence the name: InfoGeek

 

 

I would suggest that you forward copies of all your "evidence" to the FCA, label it " For Information" not a complaint.

 

 

The evidence will be noted and as we have seen recently the FCA is acting pro actively on information received.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you forward copies of all your "evidence" to the FCA, label it " For Information" not a complaint.

 

 

The evidence will be noted and as we have seen recently the FCA is acting pro actively on information received.

 

Oh yes BRIGADIER2JCS I shall most definitively be keeping any and all copies of anything they send, and forward it onto where needed

Think I'm going to have a little fun with this one first though, and supply them with all the rope they need to hang themselves

I like playing games, keeps the brainbox active ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just how many names do these people need?

 

All the same people at 2c, Cartwright Court, HUDDERSFIELD, Yorkshire, HD2 1GN, England (Virtual Office)

Absolute Locate

London Investigates

Sherlock Investigates

Sherlock Locks

Thames Valley Search

Columbus Investigations Ltd

Tower Investigations Ltd

Merit Message Company Ltd

The Location Bureau Ltd

 

All at Coombe Rd New Malden Surrey KT3 4QE

Global Debt Recovery Ltd (Company Assets £2,331,945)

Global Direct Services Plc

Winged Messenger Ltd

Global DR Ltd

Family Finance

Armstrong Recoveries

GAR

Intertrade Collections

Tracing Associates

 

 

And lastly

 

 

Family Finance UK Mortgage - Data protection registration No Z6679359 Leads to guess who?

Yep!! It’s good old Global again

You’re going to have a right laugh when you see their website, they offer to reclaim PPI

 

One can't help thinking, that if they can't make you pay under one name, they then use another ???

Edited by InfoGeek
Link to post
Share on other sites

Assignment merry-go-round so they all claim tax back on the same income and pass on the assets if the brown stuff strikes the air conditioning system.

 

The directors also play the merry-go-round, as they seem to resign, and are then reinstated all on the same day

 

I'm a little concerned, in that a DCA has a site to reclaim PPI is this even ethical?

Is it possible for them to claim on old forgotten loans/debts ect without a claimant ?

Edited by InfoGeek
Link to post
Share on other sites

Email sent to the FCA along with attached scanned file of Absolute's phishing letter (my details blanked out)

Also highlighted that their office is just a virtual office and just a front for Global

And that the Consumer credit number is using the wrong name, as it should be Natalie Bourner and not Natalie Buyner, who has had plenty of time to change it, since she was married back in 2009

A little remiss there methinks

 

Let's see if FCA respond ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email sent to the FCA along with attached scanned file of Absolute's phishing letter (my details blanked out)

Also highlighted that their office is just a virtual office and just a front for Global

And that the Consumer credit number is using the wrong name, as it should be Natalie Bourner and not Natalie Buyner, who has had plenty of time to change it, since she was married back in 2009

A little remiss there methinks

 

Let's see if FCA respond ;)

 

 

 

Much the same as the OFT they do not comment on individual " complaints" but will acknowledge and record information for use when reviewing the " interim permissions " under which DCAs are currently licenced.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe people should add to the complaint to the FCA the following statement

 

For the sake of clarity there should be ONE consumer licence per trading name

 

That might stop the proliferation of companies using Global's licence no.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've waited over a month since the first phishing letter from Absolute Locate

 

Is this the best they can come up with? I was hoping for a bit of fun, but this is boring.

 

Another phishing letter, but this time from The Winged Messenger

Addressed to 'The Current Occupier

 

Dear Sir/Madam

We act on behalf of a client in regard to a strictly confidentiallink3.gif matter.

Enquiries made suggest there is a possible connection between your address and the person we urgently need to contact.

Please help us by telephoning UK FREEPHONE 0800 458 0827 or alternatively +44(0)208 336 7015

Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Yours Faithfully

Then a scribble as a signature, but with no printed name

Your assistance is greatly appreciated

 

Oh well, another email to send off too the FCA, as this one clearly breaks their guidelines ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a quick response to my email from the FCA

They have clearly taken note of my previous email as well.

 

Dear Pete

 

Thank you for your email earlier today, in response to my email dated 10 October 2014.

 

I can confirm that as with your previous email, this email will be passed to the relevant area within the FCA. As outlined, legal restrictions prevent us from disclosing details of any potential investigation to take place. However, these comments will be noted accordingly.

 

I trust this email is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

 

I did also point out the many different names these people use, and funny how they use the same CLN

Edited by InfoGeek
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I've had two phising letters, one for Sept 2014 from absolute direct, and one in Oct 2014 from the winged messenger, of course, these are just two of the many names this company uses, they have many others. I have not responded to either, there's just no need.

First off, if, and a BIG IF, I have any debts from the past, they would be well over 10 years old, and therefore SB

 

Yesterday my wife recieved a so-called letter from sainsburys bank (see attached doc)

asking for arrears of a paltry sum (less than £10) so clearly a con just to get her to call

The fools dont know, that she has never had a sainsburys account, so clearly a phising trip to get her to provide and confirm my details

 

At the bottom of the letter you will see:

 

H Singh - director collections & recoveries

If you do a google search, the first thing that comes up, is the same type of letter used by robinson way to other people

 

IMO, this is clearly fraud and or deception, added to that, is that it would appear that 'the winged messenger' has passed/sold on any old debt to robinson way, which is clearly another breach of practice, as they did not inform me beforehand (how could they, I've never responded or confirm my details)

 

I can't confirm that this is robinson way, as no there will be no response to this latest letter

 

So what's the next step, as this clearly needs to be acted upon, and taken way up the ladder, and get these people reported

Edited by InfoGeek
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

can you convert the image to a pdf file as it is waaay too small to read properly

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Global Debt Recovery [winged messenger] and Absolute Locate aint bothered if a debt is SB, they said they will get the money one way or another.

 

 

if they have it its a lemon.

 

 

ignore them totally

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send it to the FCA :)

 

*IF* it is nothing to do with sainsburys bank, surely they should know that someone is attempting to get money in their name.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged for history

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I received a letter from GDR trace this morning & found this thread as a result.

 

I have made no attempt to contact them,

but my letter is identical to the ones listed above,

with no mention of them being involved in debt recovery.

 

I phoned the FCA & GDR Trace have a lapsed registration, so should not now be involved in debt recovery work.

 

And this despite GDR saying they work closely with the FCA on their website.

 

Their website also prominently features the ICO (Information Commissioners) logo &

 

 

on the FCA's advice I contacted the ICO to check if they were using the logo legally & they were not.

 

 

They are still registered with the ICO, but are not using the logo legally.

 

So this has been passed onto the ICO's relevant department.

 

The ICO has also requested I sent them details of the letter I received

& my conversation with the FCA so they can look at if GDR is in breech of data law in the way they operate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice :)

 

Please keep us informed :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Plonkers !!

My first letter was back in Oct 2014 from absolute locate

Then a second about 4 months later from Global debt recovery

Now, 5 Sept 2015 have just recieved yet another letter addressed to me from GDR Trace

 

"I am instructed to contact you as I beleive you may be the person out client wished to make contact with. Out trace team have made enquiries and have advised that your details have changed to the above address

Please contact us by either phone or text ect, and we will be pleased to verify our reasons for writing to you"

 

As usual no mention of WHY

Love this bit "we will be pleased to verify our reasons for writing to you"

 

On your bike sunshine ;)

 

Same people, with a new name, idiots

 

Oh well, filed under "ignore"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...