Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Victims of criminial damage & car crime encouraged to DIY their own investigations


citizenB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/11451963.Police_tell_crime_victims_to_carry_out_their_own_investigations__watchdog_says/?ref=rss

 

 

High-volume offences such as criminal damage or vehicle crime are ''on the verge of being decriminalised'' by police forces which have given up investigating them, a policing watchdog has warned.

 

In a new report, Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) said this ''mindset'' had led to a concerning trend of asking victims to turn DIY detectives and carry out investigations themselves.

 

 

 

In some forces this included asking victims to check if there was CCTV or fingerprint evidence available, as well as requesting victims interview their neighbours and check second-hand sales websites to see if their property was being sold.

 

Inspector of Constabulary Roger Baker, who led the inspection, said: ''It's more a mind-set, that we no longer deal with these things. And effectively what's happened is a number of crimes are on the verge of being decriminalised.''

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So because they cant do their job properly, they are planning on decriminalising car crime !!

 

 

Elsewhere, the inspection found some forces were losing track of named suspects and wanted persons because they did not have effective systems for actively pursing them.

 

This included suspects who had been bailed from a police station and failed to return.

 

The report said: ''It is a matter of extreme concern that some forces were not able to provide the data requested on these points. Timely and effective pursuit of named and wanted suspects should be core business for the police.

 

 

 

 

HMIC also found the national picture across all forces in relation to use of technology was ''inadequate'' with officers using ''old technology, ill-suited to modern technology''.

 

Official figures released earlier this year suggested police are failing to solve half of crimes, including nearly three quarters of cases of theft, criminal damage and arson.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am getting uncomfortably close to 60 and over the years I have come to the following conclusions.

 

1. The law seems to mainly exist for the sake of itself.

 

2. The Police seem to just be tax collecting protectors of the state.

 

3. Motorists are chased by the Police mainly for revenue rather than road safety.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The attitude of the police to criminal damage is very worrying.

 

We've been unfortunate to have suffered deliberate damage to our fence on more than one occasion. Their attitude on attendance on each occasion was boredom and disinterest. On each occasion we knew who committed the offence and on each occasion it was initially admitted to the police. All the police seemed to do was make excuses for the person damaging our property and then they tried their best to persuade us to drop the matter. Their level of expertise also left a lot to be desired as after one incident they took a picture of the wrong fence although it was obvious there was only one that was actually damaged.

 

No doubt if we'd had said we were going to go outside and defend our property they'd be round in a shot to protect the criminal. No doubt if was a local dignitaries home their attitude would be different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh you have had it easy compared to me.

My house was broken into three years ago, doors smashed and items stolen.

I caught the offender red handed and threw him out.

Police dropped the case beacuse there were no witnesses and no camera evidence.

I later discovered that the offender's wife was friendly with a Police woman on Facebook.

A while after this, a gang of thugs broke into my daughters house and attacked her.

Case dropped due to lack witnesses even though there was a witness who was willing to testify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to dig a bit deeper to get to the real root of the problem. Currently even if the police get a theft or damage case to court, the offender gets a silly slap on the wrist if found guilty. Repeat offenders know how to use the system to drag cases out along with solicitors who are getting money out the public purse to defend them.

 

I totally agree with chiefs analogy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the people are now being encouraged to investigate crime themselves. Does it follow that we'll also be allowed to be judge, jury & executioner?

 

I think I might start building a gallows in my garden for the local "yoof" :D

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to note that if you break the Road Traffic Act, the Police have no problem prosecuting you.

 

Ironically I think road traffic offences are probably one of the worst policed areas of the law, especially round where I live (North Birmingham).

 

In a week's worth of commuting (a 10 mile round trip) I will with certainty see:

 

1. drivers on their mobiles

2. ragging it past in the outside lane when I'm doing 40 in a 40 zone (i.e. speeding)

3. pulling out at junctions without looking or indicating

4. cutting you up on roundabouts

5. tailgating when I'm doing 40 in a 40 zone and the right hand lane is empty

6. doing U-Turns underneath a sign that clearly says NO U Turns

7. running red lights (particularly a certain pedestrian crossing on my route)

8. ignoring zebra/pelican crossings

 

People constantly do it here because it is not policed and they can get away with it. They'll even do it right under the noses of the cops because they know they won't get stopped.

 

And if/when they do cause an accident it's "oh well my insurance will sort it" or "I'll do a runner" if they don't have insurance, leaving the victims to pick up the pieces.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very interesting. In our local paper (I live near Bristol), there is a column called "In the courts".

The column lists and details recent Magistrates and Crown court cases.

The vast majority are motoring offences.

I have also seen many motorists driving badly as you describe.

However myself and many people I know have been pulled in my the Police for no reason when driving perfectly.

This implies that the Police can't tell the difference between a motorist driving badly and a motorist driving perfectly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have my sympathy.

 

We were told after one of these incidents that we should drop the matter because the little s**s father was a real nasty b****** and the son has a record. Presumably, we are all supposed to sit quivering in our homes putting up with having our property destroyed. when it got to court the CPS told us to drop it as he was only a child. He was actually a teenager, appearing at the same court 3 times that week for 3 different incidences and had assaulted a police officer.

 

If the Police refuse to do their duty with regards what they think are minor incidents, some people will take matters into their own hands, or as we have seen, will commit suicide as they can no longer cope.

 

 

Oh you have had it easy compared to me.

My house was broken into three years ago, doors smashed and items stolen.

I caught the offender red handed and threw him out.

Police dropped the case beacuse there were no witnesses and no camera evidence.

I later discovered that the offender's wife was friendly with a Police woman on Facebook.

A while after this, a gang of thugs broke into my daughters house and attacked her.

Case dropped due to lack witnesses even though there was a witness who was willing to testify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably to make their figures look good. Don't forget according to one report crime is on the decrease but then another report suggested figures are being fudged, victims of rape told to forget it, on the spot fines for crimes that should go court etc, etc.

 

That's very interesting. In our local paper (I live near Bristol), there is a column called "In the courts".

The column lists and details recent Magistrates and Crown court cases.

The vast majority are motoring offences.

I have also seen many motorists driving badly as you describe.

However myself and many people I know have been pulled in my the Police for no reason when driving perfectly.

This implies that the Police can't tell the difference between a motorist driving badly and a motorist driving perfectly.

Edited by citizenB
restored quote box
Link to post
Share on other sites

For many years I have suspected that the target driven culture is responsible for the mess we are in.

This was imported from America along with many other insane management ideas.

All crime figures are now fudged to make things look good, we all know that.

Sadly the Government thinks we have all been dumbed down and are all thick.

They have forgotten that there are many people still around who are well educated who can see right

through their lies and deception.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Victims of crime are entitled to expect the police to act. Are you saying we should all put up with being victims? This is a very dangerous attitude, what would it lead to in the long run?

 

I'm afraid I insisted on continuing and the youth was ordered to pay for the damage to the fence, which was all I wanted in the 1st place. Got the money in under a month.

 

 

 

I see no point in the police investigating anything when the courts just tut at them and tell them not to do it again. The whole exercise is a complete waste of money.
Edited by citizenB
restored quote box
Link to post
Share on other sites

victims of crime are entitled to expect the police to act. Are you saying we should all put up with being victims? This is a very dangerous attitude, what would it lead to in the long run?

 

I'm afraid i insisted on continuing and the youth was ordered to pay for the damage to the fence, which was all i wanted in the 1st place. Got the money in under a month. I know this doesn't always happen, but if we all just give up, i dread to think what sort of society our chidren/grandchildren will be left with.

 

 

 

Quote=conniff;4608201]i see no point in the police investigating anything when the courts just tut at them and tell them not to do it again. The whole exercise is a complete waste of money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Victims of crime are entitled to expect the police to act. Are you saying we should all put up with being victims? This is a very dangerous attitude, what would it lead to in the long run?

 

I'm afraid I insisted on continuing and the youth was ordered to pay for the damage to the fence, which was all I wanted in the 1st place. Got the money in under a month.

 

 

 

I see no point in the police investigating anything when the courts just tut at them and tell them not to do it again. The whole exercise is a complete waste of money.

 

 

That's another thing courts never seem to do. Someone damages your property and they might get a fine, well what about compensation, that should be the first consideration and punishment the second.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you report something like a broken window and stolen stereo, its difficult to see how the police could have ever chased that down without any leads?

 

 

Which is why it's important to report these things and get a crime number then when they do a drugs raid or whatever at some time in the future somewhere and find a stereo, they can check the serial number and see where it came from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus you'd need a crime number for insurance claim

 

Which is why it's important to report these things and get a crime number then when they do a drugs raid or whatever at some time in the future somewhere and find a stereo, they can check the serial number and see where it came from.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in a closed road and at the end of it (50 yards) there's a school entrance.

My neighbours and I have had our cars damaged by mums driving stupidly large 4x4 right to the school gate only to find that there's no parking spaces and try to reverse out while other 4x4s attempt the same manoeuvre.

Also kids on scooters and bikes riding on the pavement through a crowd inevitably fall against our cars.

I reported damage to my car twice but the police was not interested despite the school having cctv covering that spot.

Of course the school said that I couldn't have the cctv because of dpa.

On three occasions I witnessed my neighbour's cars being hit and run out of the house to stop the offender.

On the first and third occasion I managed to keep them there by blocking the road with my car while they were making all sort of threats.

The coppers arrived and got their details.

They gave them to me to pass to my neighbours 😠 and took no further action.

What about attempting to leave the scene of a rta?!?!

" Well, they didn't leave, you kept them here. Well done!" I was said.

On the second occasion I didn't grab my car keys and this mad chav almost run me over to escape.

Called 999 and gave them reg number.

I was told it was not an emergency and to report it to local police station.

I am not a copper, but leaving the scene of a rta and try to run someone over while doing so sounds like a criminal offence to me.

What if the woman was drunk and went on to kill a pedestrian?

Wouldn't that look bad in the evening standard?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...