Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JSA - Actively seeking employment form


Abbtt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was previously told by my adviser screenshots of my mailbox are required to prove that I am actively looking for works.

 

For months there were never any problems with my job search. However now I am given some forms called Actively seeking employment (with questions like what did you do, when did you do it, job details etc) by the JC staff, she told me to fill it in and then show it to her tomorrow.

 

I really do not know why this happened as she obviously cannot be bothered to explain it to me. It somehow makes me feel that she did not trust the evidences I provided at all (she's photocopied the screenshots I provided).

 

I'd basically just like to ask if it is normal for the JC advisor to ask the claimant to fill out this form, when the claimant already provided screenshots of the mailbox?? I personally really do not know how to answer some of the questions listed. For examples: which JC did you use to look for jobs and on what date(s) did you visit/contact them? Can I simply say that I went to JC only to sign on??...

 

Just noticed that there are questions like "why do you feel that the steps you have taken to find work in the week in question give you your best prospects of getting a job?

Why did you not take all those steps to find work that you had agreed to on your agreement? (WHAT?!!) etc"

Very tricky questions I have to say!!

 

 

Thanks.

Edited by Abbtt
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are trying to trip you up son they can find reasons to sanction you, answer all questions with a positive answer....you HAVE taken all the steps agreed in your agreement, you HAVe carefully researched the companies you have applied for jobs with, you HAVE sent off applications

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are trying to trip you up son they can find reasons to sanction you, answer all questions with a positive answer....you HAVE taken all the steps agreed in your agreement, you HAVe carefully researched the companies you have applied for jobs with, you HAVE sent off applications

 

Thank you. I agree with you. I really feel like they kinda wanna trip me up.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I agree with you. I really feel like they kinda wanna trip me up.....

 

I think they are being forced to do that more and more as it gets near to election time just so the Condems can say how well they have done in getting unemployment levels down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are being forced to do that more and more as it gets near to election time just so the Condems can say how well they have done in getting unemployment levels down!

 

Well, yes! They are indeed very good at sanctioning people!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, yes! They are indeed very good at sanctioning people!!

Yes they are and I have found out some really concerning underhand activity within the job centres regarding who they target to sanction even if the claimant has done nothing wrong . Its disgusting they did it to my daughter said she never attended her sign on so she was sanctioned and got no money for a month she disputed this and found someone who spoke to her that day she was supposed to sign and got her money in the end but it was a battle it shoukdnt be like this not every young person wants to claim jobseekers my daughter hates it and cant wait to get a full time job shes a hard worker and it really ****es me off when the young and eager get treated like this because of a government who wants to muslesd the public it stinks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are and I have found out some really concerning underhand activity within the job centres regarding who they target to sanction even if the claimant has done nothing wrong . Its disgusting they did it to my daughter said she never attended her sign on so she was sanctioned and got no money for a month she disputed this and found someone who spoke to her that day she was supposed to sign and got her money in the end but it was a battle it shoukdnt be like this not every young person wants to claim jobseekers my daughter hates it and cant wait to get a full time job shes a hard worker and it really ****es me off when the young and eager get treated like this because of a government who wants to muslesd the public it stinks

 

Sorry for the late reply. Thank you for sharing your daughter's experience with the JC here. I really do not know why I was picked but I am definitely one of their target.

 

I've listed the questions on the form below, if anyone is interested to read:

Which jobcentres did you use to look for jobs and on what dates did you visit or contact?

Which newspapers did you check for jobs and on what dates did you check?

What employment agencies are you registered with and on what dates did you visit or contact them?

What other steps did you take to find work and on what dates did you take those steps?

List the jobs applied: name+address of employer, whre was the job advertised, how did i contact, type of work, date applied, outcome

Give details of any other employers contacted and explain why not if you have not contacted any other

why do you feel that the steps you have taken to find work in the week in question give you your best prospects of getting a job?

Why did you not take all those steps to find work that you had agreed to on your agreement?

State if there is anything that prevented you from looking for work in the week in question

Give dates and details of all the thing did to find work in the two weeks that before the period at issue

 

What do they mean "the week in question"? I've never have any problems with my jobsearch before!!

And how can I possibly remember what dates I did what exactly? What kind of answers they are actually looking for?

 

Why do they want to know what I did two weeks before this "period at issue"? Their colleague had checked what I've done back to that time and they apparently did not have any problems with it!!!!

 

I've showed my screenshots to them as required and now they are saying things like "in question" "at issue"? I known they are targeting me because this is not the first obstacle I encountered, and I won my case in court when the JC sanctioned me for not actively looking for work (they somehow just believed/thought I was :lol:) early this year!!

Edited by Abbtt
Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, what they are doing is trying to get you angry so you lose your cool and they can sanction you or you decide you cannot take it and sign off. The system (JCP and WP provider, in my case INGEUS) made me so ill I reverted from JSA to ESA a few weeks back and have a 12 week unfit for work note due to a history of anxiety and depression - this way it gives me 3 months of relief whilst I look for work in my own time with no added pressure (unneccesary pressure Imay add) from these people.

 

You have two choices - play ball and do what they ask which will annoy them more or lose your cool and get sanctioned. There is another way around it - my way, but I had a history of A&D so played on that and I was bad a few weeks ago. Still not great but since I have not had to sign on and go to pointless INGEUS workshops or appointments I have been better. Honest people whould simply be left alone to look for work - we are being made to play a stupid game and jump through hoops to get our lousy £72p/w

Edited by honeybee13
Pejorative word.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been relatively lucky with JCP advisers, mine have been generally OK but as soon as I got to INGEUS things changed (not from JCP side) from tolerable to just simply pathetic. They do not care about you, never think that they do, they want you in work so they can get their bonuses even if it means you are worse off

Link to post
Share on other sites

100% spot on. I joined this candidate pool last year and ingeus have done nothing for me until the last 3 weeks when they have offered me 3 crappy jobs including one at a discount job on 10 grand a year. Im between the ages of 40-45 not a school leaver ffs. They are playing hard ball with me after i opened a can of worms about their policy on travel expenses. I'm now on the verge of losing the plot with a female management person who keeps texting me rubbish jobs. My dignity says dont hold back when i see them, and i am finding it harder and harder to play ball. They're not interested in my future, just their pathetic targets. Ive applied my arse off for proper jobs, and i remain positive. Just wish they would have some faith in my honesty and not have this sad one size fits all every one out of work is lazy approach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've said exactly the same thing as I did in the long complaint I sent in to the heads of the work programme after leaving Ingeus. I wrote;

 

'Work Providers are given contracts to help and support those who genuinely need it, without wasting resources and the time of those who don’t. In my experience, the problem with the Work Programme - apart from the financial incentives and ‘quantity versus quality’ issues - is that it is a ’one size fits all’ scheme; every client is automatically deemed to be lacking in training, qualifications, literacy, confidence and life-skills and there is no provision for those clients who are already well-skilled and qualified - often more so than their so-called ’advisors’. The ethos seems to be ‘If clients need training courses, send them; if they don’t then send them anyway as we get paid and it looks like we’re helping’.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would answer those questions (and I was given them when I was on JSA over two years ago - it was the step before I got assigned to the local Work Provider (or should I say '''blood pressure increasing" provider, liWhich jobcentres did you use to look for jobs and on what dates did you visit or contact?

 

Which newspapers did you check for jobs and on what dates did you check?

This is listed in detail on the attached sheet - you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway.

What employment agencies are you registered with and on what dates did you visit or contact them?

This is listed in detail on the attached sheet - you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway.

What other steps did you take to find work and on what dates did you take those steps?

This is listed in detail on the attached sheet - you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway.

List the jobs applied: name+address of employer, whre was the job advertised, how did i contact, type of work, date applied, outcome

A copy of my JSA document is attached, this is sufficient for them and should be for you, you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway

Give details of any other employers contacted and explain why not if you have not contacted any other

I have not been able to contact any other employers because I have been too busy filling in this intensive, intrusive document

why do you feel that the steps you have taken to find work in the week in question give you your best prospects of getting a job?

I have taken the steps explained to me by yourselves and listed in my JSA, these, by your own admission, should give me the best prospect of getting a job

Why did you not take all those steps to find work that you had agreed to on your agreement?

I have taken extensive steps, and I would now request that you undertake an English reading course to enable you to understand the words I write are the truth.

State if there is anything that prevented you from looking for work in the week in question

Spending time filling in this extensive intrusive form and expanding on the detail I already provide regarding my JSA obligations.

Give dates and details of all the thing did to find work in the two weeks that before the period at issue

See attached documentation -

 

I now require a copy of your Formal Complaints Procedure as I am suffering due to your harrassment and lack of sensitivity at time when I have enough financial problems to deal with - let alone continually monitor and record every single action I do relating to my jobsearch activities.

 

The whole job search thing is very exhausting in itself, let alone having to deal with people who seem 'programmed' to think you are NOT CAPABLE of doing your best on every job application and are 'Living the life of Riley' on basic JSA.

 

What peed me off about the Work Provider was if I had known otherwise I could have gone self-employed and got some funding, but because I was shoved onto them there was no funding for my age group(50+) whereas there was outside the WP scheme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would answer those questions (and I was given them when I was on JSA over two years ago - it was the step before I got assigned to the local Work Provider (or should I say '''blood pressure increasing" provider, liWhich jobcentres did you use to look for jobs and on what dates did you visit or contact?

 

Which newspapers did you check for jobs and on what dates did you check?

This is listed in detail on the attached sheet - you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway.

What employment agencies are you registered with and on what dates did you visit or contact them?

This is listed in detail on the attached sheet - you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway.

What other steps did you take to find work and on what dates did you take those steps?

This is listed in detail on the attached sheet - you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway.

List the jobs applied: name+address of employer, whre was the job advertised, how did i contact, type of work, date applied, outcome

A copy of my JSA document is attached, this is sufficient for them and should be for you, you already have this information from me on a weekly basis anyway

Give details of any other employers contacted and explain why not if you have not contacted any other

I have not been able to contact any other employers because I have been too busy filling in this intensive, intrusive document

why do you feel that the steps you have taken to find work in the week in question give you your best prospects of getting a job?

I have taken the steps explained to me by yourselves and listed in my JSA, these, by your own admission, should give me the best prospect of getting a job

Why did you not take all those steps to find work that you had agreed to on your agreement?

I have taken extensive steps, and I would now request that you undertake an English reading course to enable you to understand the words I write are the truth.

State if there is anything that prevented you from looking for work in the week in question

Spending time filling in this extensive intrusive form and expanding on the detail I already provide regarding my JSA obligations.

Give dates and details of all the thing did to find work in the two weeks that before the period at issue

See attached documentation -

 

I now require a copy of your Formal Complaints Procedure as I am suffering due to your harrassment and lack of sensitivity at time when I have enough financial problems to deal with - let alone continually monitor and record every single action I do relating to my jobsearch activities.

 

The whole job search thing is very exhausting in itself, let alone having to deal with people who seem 'programmed' to think you are NOT CAPABLE of doing your best on every job application and are 'Living the life of Riley' on basic JSA.

 

What peed me off about the Work Provider was if I had known otherwise I could have gone self-employed and got some funding, but because I was shoved onto them there was no funding for my age group(50+) whereas there was outside the WP scheme.

 

 

Hi,

Thank you so much for providing such detailed answers for each question. I already handed in the form and unsurprisingly I did not get any payment for the two weeks. :mad2: I have no clues of why exactly they stopped it as I have received no letter from them at all. I will wait till the end of next week to see if there are any letters by then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wait, give them the same disrespect that they are treating you - explain to them that you are now unable to meet any jobseeking commitments as you have no funds, cannot feed yourself and cannot cope with the additional pressure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thank you so much for providing such detailed answers for each question. I already handed in the form and unsurprisingly I did not get any payment for the two weeks. :mad2: I have no clues of why exactly they stopped it as I have received no letter from them at all. I will wait till the end of next week to see if there are any letters by then.

 

They're supposed to notify you in writing why your benefit was stopped. It's clearly stated in the Decision Makers guidance that 'all sanctions must be notified' and that a sanction 'is not effective unless notified'. I had a sanction once and they failed to inform me of it in writing so I quoted the guidance to them and threatened all manner of publicity - I got my money refunded. Worth chasing them up - they seem to be doing this a hell of a lot these days, stopping people's money but not telling them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...