Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stemologica - cancel here 08000148005 + Email addresses + return AD


jokearns1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

both i'll send you a PM

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got 2 emails saying the same thing and

 

 

they are from [email protected]

 

 

and

 

 

[email protected].

 

 

Send proof of postage to

 

 

[email protected]

 

 

and

 

 

[email protected].

 

 

Even tho they sent both items in the same package

 

 

you have to send the same proof of postage to different addresses.

 

 

PS remove the spaces in all the email addresses.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am sorry to say that, like others, I've had nothing but trouble with this company.

 

 

I had to wait a very long time on the line to cancel.

 

 

And after I did so, returned the item,

 

 

and had their conformation that my account was closed and no further payments would be made,

 

 

I received an odd message saying 'you can return products only if they are in its (sic) original condition'

and "our return department confirmed with official report that your product is not in its original condition.

You are not eligible for full refund'.

 

How can a product be in its 'original condition' if it has been tried out, as authorised under the terms of an agreement?

 

Does anyone know anymore about this 'problem company"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jokearns1

Could you share the Rugby address for returning products please? And also which tel. number you called to speak to Dalia in Customer services? We are having no luck with this.

 

Have you been charged anything other than the P&P cost? Did you manage to send the trial products back within the 14 days to avoid charges?

Any advice you can offer would be fantastic as order placed this evening and have been trying to cancel since 2 mons after placed!

Many thanks

Linda

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 29

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to say that I had a very pleasant experience as their customer service responded to my email at instant, and they helped me resolve my matter :roll:

They even gave me discounted prices of the products, so that made me happy :)

 

If you are from the UK , I reached them at 080-8189-0131

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry to say that, like others, I've had nothing but trouble with this company.

 

 

I had to wait a very long time on the line to cancel.

 

 

And after I did so, returned the item,

 

 

and had their conformation that my account was closed and no further payments would be made,

 

 

I received an odd message saying 'you can return products only if they are in its (sic) original condition'

and "our return department confirmed with official report that your product is not in its original condition.

You are not eligible for full refund'.

 

How can a product be in its 'original condition' if it has been tried out, as authorised under the terms of an agreement?

 

Does anyone know anymore about this 'problem company"?

 

You can also reach them via email

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was charged $149.95 for my "free sample" plus $5.95 to expedite the shipping which I did not want. It still took almost a month to get the product. Then I was on vacation so my children opened it and didn't keep the package and I have no mailing instructions. How do I get those??

 

They sent me the terms and conditions, right after I asked them why I had a returned address on the box of the Stemologica kit.

 

You can cancel by sending an email to the support, they will do this for you

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nathaly, if this is your real name, then I would suggest you request a user name change - you can do this by sending an email using the Contact us button at the very bottom of the screen or by private message to any one of the site team.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following information is in the Public Domain on Stemologica.

 

First we have Stemologicauk.com - http://stemologicauk.com/

 

This is the whoisdomain link on above: http://whois.domaintools.com/stemologicauk.com

 

Note from the whoisdomain link above: The IP Location is: Karnataka - Mangalore & the IP Address is: 119.18.51.79

 

 

Stemoderma.com: https://www.stemoderma.com/

 

this is the whoisdomain on the above: http://whois.domaintools.com/stemoderma.com

 

Note the IP Location is: Oregon - Portland, United States & the IP Address is: 50.112.189.169

 

On the Stemoderma.com website the actual Company and Location is:

 

Faseder Ltd., Janackovo nabrezi 17, PC 150 00, Prague 5, Czech Republic. Company registration #24139131.

 

Terms & Conditions Link: https://www.stemoderma.com/terms.php?categoryid=0

 

Note: Under their Terms & Conditions The Governing Law: This Agreement and all disputes or issues arising from it shall be governed exclusively by the laws of Czech Republic, without regard to conflict or conflict of law principles.

 

 

we also have Stemologica.com: https://www.stemologica.com/

 

this is the whoisdomain on the above: http://whois.domaintools.com/stemologica.com

 

Note the IP Location is: Oregon - Portland, United States & the IP Address is: 50.112.148.5

 

On the Stemologica.com website the actual Company and Location is:

 

Erterei Ltd., Krizikova 213/44, Karlin, 186 00 Prague, The Czech Republic. Company registration #02136929

 

Terms & Conditions Link: https://stemologica.com/terms.php?categoryid=0

 

Note: Under their Terms & Conditions The Governing Law: This Agreement and all disputes or issues arising from it shall be governed exclusively by the laws of Czech Republic, without regard to conflict or conflict of law principles.

 

Now if you look at the Terms & Condition specifically 7. Return and Refund Policies for both stemoderma.com and stemologica.com you will note that the return addresses are the exact same.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

RE. STEMOLOGCIA

It appears to be an American company operating in the UK but not abiding by UK standards.

£97.95 was taken from my card account after only ten days. I emailed stating that the two weeks trial period was not up and I

would return the products. I spent over half an hour on the telephone with a stroppy person (Kassidy) inn South Caroline USA. who argued and

argued and would not budge, but said they would reduce the amount by half.

When I referred to their terms and conditions i.e. items could be returned, she said they could not.

OBVIOUSLY A REAL [problem] - DON'T TOUCH THEM WITH A BARGE POLE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your speedy replies and advice.

 

Unfortunately there is no address to write to cancel any further products other than the address to return the product

which i suspect is just a central hub.

 

I will however write to this address as they must be operating as agents for the company.

 

I will contact the bank and keep you guys informed of my progress.

 

Finally i cant believe that the way this company acts is within the bounds of legality...

 

..anyway will have to stop before i start ranting....

 

 

 

© 2014 Invision House, Wilbury Way, Hitchin, Hertfodshire, UK. All rights reserved. Stemologica™ is a registered trademarks (®) of AKA Marketing Limited Any unauthorised use is prohibited and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Today's charge will appear on your statement as stemcellset.com 08000885638.

 

We are in no way affiliates with CNN, Anderson Cooper, Anderson Cooper 360, Allure, Martha Stweward Living, Oprah Whinfrey, Marie Claire, Cosmopolitan, or any other brand mentioned on this website, which us a registered trademark of its respective owner(s).

 

This page may contained simulated imagery and/or manipulated graphics. Any such content is for strictly illustrative purposes only and AKA Marketing Limited does neither warranty nor promise similar results. Stem cell extract, as well as Dead Sea minerals, salts and mud have been found effective in the treatment of psoriasis and other skin disorders. However, our products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any diseases. If you have a serious skin disease, please consult with a dermatologist, your family doctor or another qualified specialist immediately. All attributed testimonials on this page are from real customers. No statement or information found on this page has not been evaluated by the United States Food and Drug Administration.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have called their customer service, and they became rude when I told them to cancel any further shipments and when I asked for a return address, she refused to give me one claiming I was outside the time period for return and basically "too bad". At the time I signed up for the shipment (after taking a survey and being rewarded with this "free gift" - just pay shipping), I specifically wrote to their customer service provided with the sign up sheet that I did not want further charges and to cancel any future shipments. It would not allow me to print this message. I received my package in pretty much generic form with no shipping paperwork, further instructions on return, how to use the cream, nothing. I assumed it ws nasty because I had already told them not to send me anymore and I did not want product from the get go. I was angry to see the $149.95 applied to my credit card and I have been fighting them ever since. I have talked to stemocell.com and their agent was rude and refused to give me a return address claiming I was outside the time limit. When I told her I was going to report their refusal to work with me, she said they were within their rights to refuse to give me the return address because I had failed their rules and now I need to pay the full charge but she would cancel future charges and shipments. I decided to go online to see if other people have been treated this way and if this is just another rip off [problem] to get your money. I have disputed this charge with my credit card company and of course they want proof that I told them (which comment stemocell.com did not allow me to print). This is the first return address I see. No return address was included in my package. The outside package was also generic and provided no return address that I can remember. Should have kept it. The product package itself looks like it has been used and reused many times. The only return address I see on my credit card statement shows Trafalgar Sq GBR, nothing else. Did you have any luck with this address or do I now just take this as another lesson learned. I hope my credit card company can do something but stemologic has been here before and seems to cover all their legal bases on what they can get away with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We found the return address on their terms and conditions, but during my phone call to them, they were adamant that I was out of the time limit and could not return it. I told them that the packaging was damaged and no paperwork or instructions for use were included.

I printed out the emails that I sent to both companies, well within the time limit, stating I wanted to return the goods.

Our credit card company are taking it up and we asked them to cancel our card and issue a new number, which they have done.

Fingers crossed and waiting to see

Certainly won't get caught again !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have called their customer service, and they became rude when I told them to cancel any further shipments and when I asked for a return address, she refused to give me one claiming I was outside the time period for return and basically "too bad". At the time I signed up for the shipment (after taking a survey and being rewarded with this "free gift" - just pay shipping), I specifically wrote to their customer service provided with the sign up sheet that I did not want further charges and to cancel any future shipments. It would not allow me to print this message. I received my package in pretty much generic form with no shipping paperwork, further instructions on return, how to use the cream, nothing. I assumed it ws nasty because I had already told them not to send me anymore and I did not want product from the get go. I was angry to see the $149.95 applied to my credit card and I have been fighting them ever since. I have talked to stemocell.com and their agent was rude and refused to give me a return address claiming I was outside the time limit. When I told her I was going to report their refusal to work with me, she said they were within their rights to refuse to give me the return address because I had failed their rules and now I need to pay the full charge but she would cancel future charges and shipments. I decided to go online to see if other people have been treated this way and if this is just another rip off [problem] to get your money. I have disputed this charge with my credit card company and of course they want proof that I told them (which comment stemocell.com did not allow me to print). This is the first return address I see. No return address was included in my package. The outside package was also generic and provided no return address that I can remember. Should have kept it. The product package itself looks like it has been used and reused many times. The only return address I see on my credit card statement shows Trafalgar Sq GBR, nothing else. Did you have any luck with this address or do I now just take this as another lesson learned. I hope my credit card company can do something but stemologic has been here before and seems to cover all their legal bases on what they can get away with.

 

 

you need to start a new thread

 

 

of your own

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...