Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Splitit / Vendor payment issue


aj84
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I purchased an item just over a year ago from an online site that had the option of using Split-it for paying.  Silly me, while I did not need to use it, I just found it convenient to use it especially given the smaller amounts leaving disposable cash for something else.

For those that do not use know how it works, quite simply, purchase an item for say £400, and pay £33.33 a month for 12 months with no credit searches etc.  Similar to what Amazon do/did before Barclays instalments started to take over.

Long story short, I noticed the monthly payments appearing on my pending transactions every month on my Amex card and thought nothing of it.  Fast forward almost 12 months, turns out all but 2 of these pending payments were actually taken - the rest were unbeknown to me, not taken.

They then started to take 2 payments a month past the date of when the instalment plan finished which is when I queried it - note, the online portal still to date states completed.  This is when I contacted them to be told due to a technical issue, they did not actually take any payments for almost 11 months and they would now start taking 2 a month.  This was followed by a more generic/global email stating exactly that.

This was indeed the case for 2-ish months until today when I noticed I have 6 pending payments which I think equates to the remaining balance - again online portal still says completed and no open plans.

 

1. Is what they are doing right?  There seems to be no accountability on both the split-it end nor the vendor of the product.

2. Could I just block these pending payments with Amex and not pay it/create my own plan?  While I could just pay it off, I feel cheated - I went for a 12 month instalment plan for a reason and that was not to then go onto a 6 month instalment plan with double the amount a year later.  Not to mention, others may not be able to pay !

3. Any other advice?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

This them ?

WWW.SPLITIT.COM

Buy Now Pay Later in installments. Offer customers up to 24 months to pay using their own credit card, no hidden fees or added interest.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I see there is a on line chat option on the link have you asked why this error occurred ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - at the time, they were being quite closed-off and not giving much detail apart from "you have not paid" - when actually it was more "we did not collect"


Tried for almost 2 days before telling Amex to reverse the charges x2 however I cancelled the case/reversal when they finally responded. It was only when I escalated to management did I get a bit more detail however

here is the official email received:

We are writing on behalf of [vendor] to let you know that, unfortunately, a technical issue occurred on your payment plan which caused one or more of your monthly instalment payments to be missed.  This meant that, whilst payments showed on our end and on your instalment plan in the shopper portal; they were never actually processed and will not be showing on your credit card account. 

Please check your credit card account on or around your scheduled instalment date(s), and you should see that these payments do not appear. You can check the due dates in the Splitit Shopper Portal here

We are intending to process any missed payments over the next few days. If you have missed multiple payments we will only process 2 missed payments at any one time and will email you again before any more missed payments will be processed.


 If the missing payment(s) is/are showing on your credit card statement on or around your instalment dates please reply with a screenshot/statement from your credit card that shows this, and we will be happy to investigate further.

 Thank you for your understanding and we are sorry for any inconvenience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they will not take more than 2 at a time ? Have you raised it with the retailer ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 Payments a month was my understanding but this month I can see 6 pending payments.

Yup contacted the retailer who are as useless. Initially a blame game : Retailer > Splitit and Splitit>retailer.
It was going meant to get escalated the first time too but I never heard back from them and subsequent emails were ignored.  Calls usually got through to the wrong team or if right, you would start at the beginning only to be then told it is going to management...and of course nothing back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try dropping the following an email of your discontent and advise them they are in breach of your agreement and you shouldn't have to suffer distress due to their inefficiency to abide by their agreement.

 Nandan Sheth as CEO

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have done this now following yet another frustrating live chat who seemed to initially even say we can't find an open plan....well yes duh!

So far nandan.sheth @ and nandansheth @ have both failed

nandan @ seems to have gone through and I CCd the support address too but they've been thus far unresponsive.


In the meantime, I've raised a dispute with Amex who have all the emails/evidence now for it and have put a merchant block.  Thankfully splitit is not a credit provider so no impact to credit searches etc.

One point they made was if your card was not longer available (bearing in mind the linked card was removed from Splitit by myself so how they're still taking payments is beyond me), I could make manual payments - Maybe I should do this now that the merchant is blocked ...say £5 a month?

Really infuriates me when companies act like this - I'm not even saying no to paying even if they did make a monumental mistake for almost a year but to then once again breach their own apology email.... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

To close this off - they refused to budge.

Any combination of email address bar one bounced back as far as Nandan Sheth is concerned and despite requesting multiple times for someone senior, it was ignored.

They have however stated by their recent action of essentially charged all remaining payments in one hit, there is no outstanding payments left.

Feel extremely cheated but partly my mistake in not picking up earlier so lesson learnt - One thing is for sure, Split it will not be used again in this household but it has made me think twice about whether we would use Oral B products again who was the company we bought the products from and maybe revert back to Philips when the 3 brushes die.

 

Thanks again for your help - 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...