Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hastings direct repiarer damaged my car £3000 to repair it now


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My car is insured with Hastings Direct. It was damaged in storms at Christmas whilst parked overnight and then bodge repaired on my insurance by Hastings approved repairer RGM Bodyworks of Haverfordwest Pembrokeshire.

 

The repairs were so bad that Hastings had to send out their own independent engineer form AIA Independant Assesors who agreed with another bodyshop that RGM have caused £3000 worth of damage to my car which has actually written my car off as I only paid £4100 for it a few months ago.

 

 

Now Hastings claims dept and the repair agent Fleet Accident Repair Group ( FARG as they like to be known) are doing everything to delay and bully me from getting justice and my car repaired. The bodywork and paintwork is so badly repaired that their engineer states it in his report which I have managed out get out of them. We have a disabled child and our car is now useless to us, we have to depend on friends to get our child to hospital and appointments etc now.

 

 

I recommend that you stay well clear of Hastings Direct and their agents FARG as they are totally useless and a rip off. You get treated like you are something they have trod in on the street.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

If i were you, i would get a full complaint to their CEO and consider legal action.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

RGM Bodyworks of Haverfordwest repaird my car through my insurer Hastings Direct after storms damaged its paintwork and left some dents in the panels. The repair total cost was £1200.

 

When I picked the car up I saw the paintwork was rubbish and told them I was not happy. The car has been inspected by an Independent motor assessor appointed by the insurance company and a number of other body shops. The assessor agreed in full that RGM have caused £3000 worth of damage to my car and that they are fully responsible.

 

My insurance Hastings just keep delaying my car getting repaired because of the cost to its repair shop and its reputation. Now I am fed up as we have a disabled child and our car is now useless. My advice do not use either Hastings or RGM bodyworks of Haverfordwest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi freddyfisherman

 

There are lots of things you can do to get things moving. We have a Hasting Rep who can look into the matter, hopefully he can get involved. If it doesn't get resolved to your satisfaction you have other options.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/member.php?355258-Hastings-Direct.-Jamie-Wicks.Social-Media-Manager

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi freddyfisherman, Thank you for posting about your experience. I am very sorry to hear that you are unhappy with the service that has been provided. Can you please contact us directly by email and provide us with your policy details so that this can be followed up for you? [email protected] Many Thanks, Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jamie from Hastings Direct

The matter is currently sitting on your own Glyn Meakin's dept heads desk

My car was damaged by your repairer in January. We have a disabled child who needs this car daily and its now almost April. That's not what I call good customer service is it. I will email you on the address you give with claim details etc now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to Jamie of Hastings Direct.

I reserve the right to publish and pass on any material in my possession by whatever media whatsoever including your own engineers report that I have possession of which clearly in plain English states "the repairs are very poor" regarding your own authorized bodyshop bodged repairs to my car. My car is now a write off because of Hastings Direct . Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

EXTRACT COPIED AND PASTED DIRECT FROM HASTINGS DIRECT OWN INDEPENDENT ASSESSORS REPORT ON THE REPAIRS;

 

NATURE OF INCIDENT

The vehicle appears to have suffered light storm damage to the left hand side when fence panels blew over onto the

vehicle.

The vehicle was repaired at R G M Haverfordwest, the repairs are very poor, especially the paint work. The repairs are

poor with shrinkage and ripples. Distortion to the lhr door handle area is evident. Paint is missing from the lhr

wheelarch. Sander scratch marks to the lhr door shut, rough dry edges to the door shuts and roof cant rail, over spray

and poor masking to the lh roof moulding which should have been removed. The paint work is miss matched with

flotation, dry patches and sections not painted. This paint work is of a very poor professional standard.

The policyholder does not want the vehicle to go back the original repairing garage and has obtained an estimate from

XXXXXXXXX Coachworks for renewing the doors, in our opinion the only way to get the vehicle back to its pre-accident

condition and to keep the insured happy is to replace the doors

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to replace the doors.

Worst case scenario they can be stripped and repainted properly for about £500/600 per door.

Any dents and scratch can be fixed after stripping.

In any case they damaged the car and they have to fix it.

How much did they offer to write it off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks King1234

Unfortunately for Hastings I am an actual ex bodyshop manager with over 30 years in the trade. I am semi retired as we have a disabled child that I look after now. The bodyshop totally bodged my cars repairs and the doors are so bad that they will not fill and economicaly repair to a satisfactory standard. I have the right to refuse skins as my car was body perfect before they destroyed its bodywork and it is not accident damage but their bodged repairs that caused it. Hastings own engineer has agreed that the only way to repair this car is new doors.The rear quarter panel is also very badly repaired as is the font wing and the shrinkage is the worst I have ever seen. But I have found a good garage locally that is capable of doing a decent repair. The paintwork they did is appalling all down one side, on the roof and the bonnet. The car is only worth £4000 and Hastings don't even acknowledge they are liable as they are now arguing between themselves as to who will have to pay up. But they will pay up as I do not ever give up. RGM Bodyworks of Haverfordwest repairs to my car are so bad that I would not let them paint my wheelbarrow let alone a car. :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hastings are entirely responsible for the actions of any contractors they appoint to work on their behalf.

 

Have a read of this from the Ombudsman which you may find helpful, it would be worth Jamie reading it and feeding it back to his colleagues.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/household-insurance-repairs.html

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/88/88-insurance-claim-disputes.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi freddyfisherman, Thank you again for the update to this thread. Our team have been attempting to contact you but have so far been unsuccessful, can you please contact me again by email and provide the best telephone number and most convenient time for us to contact you? Many Thanks, Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dacouc

They will definitely pay with full compensation as well, and I am talking to my solicitor. I reported that the car repairs were rubbish straight away, then after the bodyshop ignored me I made and official complaint to Hastings in February. They still think that I will go away if they ignore me. Never going to happen and the ombudsman is just one way to get justice. They soon snatch your premiums out of your hand each year, but when they mess up its the three brass monkey brigade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jamie of Hastings. Your company and you have my full details inc phone numbers and email contacts. You can try to look like you are helping on this forum but the public know exactly how you treat your customers when you mess up and the bill is landing at your door. Hastings customer service is absolutely pathetic as are their cheap back street bodyshop repairers. Cheap insurance quotes are not necessarily the best option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can claim up to £10k via small claims, and it doesn't cost much, and it's not complicated to do. I would say to go down that route if they can't sort it out very soon. Claim for loss of earnings as well as the inconvenience for not having your car useable. Wouldn't be surprised if the costs came close to £10k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...