Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am aware that I have a few options, one being perhaps forcing the sale of the property, however I'm not really inclined to do that, (well not in the short term anyway) however this may change. Another option is to collect information about the defendants income to perhaps add to my options. Another way is to apply to HCEO, which could be dramatic and for now at least, I am still calming down to immediately consider this in the short term, but yet this may change. For now at least, I will sit on the charging order and consider carefully what to do..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that was part of the point of having a charging order or restriction with the Land Registry. This isn't my speciality though, others will advise I expect.

 

HB

 

I'm sure your right, just trying to think ahead in any event of skullduggery..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gr8 to hear CD! Would like to know what happened about the claim of not being his sig. So now the set aside has been dismissed, you can move on with the charging order.

 

Never did hear from the police regarding the claim it wasn't his signature..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I often wonder if I could get a report from the police what he said about me..

 

I suppose the police see it as a person who lied, and they are used to porky pies and then the person saying something like, 'I had a drink that night gov, don't remember signing anything' or 'It was difficult times for me back then, it's all a blur'. They may also suggest it's a private slander case. In the end the Judge believed you so the man made himself look like a fool, if that's any consolation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose the police see it as a person who lied, and they are used to porky pies and then the person saying something like, 'I had a drink that night gov, don't remember signing anything' or 'It was difficult times for me back then, it's all a blur'. They may also suggest it's a private slander case. In the end the Judge believed you so the man made himself look like a fool, if that's any consolation.

 

Of course, reporting me to the police for a crime that has not been committed isn't going anywhere. I won the case anyway and I just wait for a short while and I continue with collection..

Link to post
Share on other sites

To apply for an Oral Examination you should get a "Request for Oral Examination" Form from the court. You will have to pay a small court fee when you return the form to the court.

 

You will need to give details of the amount of money which remains unpaid under the judgment.

 

The court will serve an Order telling your opponent to come to court - some courts prefer to send an Affidavit, (see Affidavit in Support) or Questionnaire to the opponent to complete first. When your opponent attends court he or she will be questioned by either a District Judge or an officer of the court.

 

You do not have to be present, but you can be if you wish, you can also write into the court with details of any questions you would like the court to ask your opponent.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have phoned HCEO who confirmed it was £60.00 for application and £90.00 compliance fee ? which I understood to be applied if the baliffs could not enforce the vist. Am I right so far. In any event they gained access to the property but couldn't pay in full, would further interest be added for the defendant..

Link to post
Share on other sites

To apply for an Oral Examination you should get a "Request for Oral Examination" Form from the court. You will have to pay a small court fee when you return the form to the court.

 

You will need to give details of the amount of money which remains unpaid under the judgment.

 

The court will serve an Order telling your opponent to come to court - some courts prefer to send an Affidavit, (see Affidavit in Support) or Questionnaire to the opponent to complete first. When your opponent attends court he or she will be questioned by either a District Judge or an officer of the court.

 

You do not have to be present, but you can be if you wish, you can also write into the court with details of any questions you would like the court to ask your opponent.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Now called application for order that debtor attend court for questionong. According to just claim,this sounds less ambiguous (or something like that)..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have phoned HCEO who confirmed it was £60.00 for application and £90.00 compliance fee ? which I understood to be applied if the baliffs could not enforce the vist. Am I right so far. In any event they gained access to the property but couldn't pay in full, would further interest be added for the defendant..

 

According to HCEO, a compliance fee is payable if unsucessful. Am I right in thinking then that compiance fee(s) are not charged from other enforcement compaines ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And/or ask in the bailiff forum. :)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Charging Order can be registered against a property as either an Equitable Charge (one owned and one debtor) or a Restriction (more than one owner but only one debtor).

 

At a guess, I have an Equitable charge as he is the sole owner but paying a mortgage. Does this sound correct..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...