Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

False advertising at Currys?


Mike W68
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I know there is a forum specifically for currys, but I thought this one warranted a wider audience.

I needed a phone quickly to replace one that was destroyed over Christmas. I rely on my phone for work and not having a phone will seriously affect my ability to make money. I found the phone I wanted yesterday on Amazon for £395 and at Currys for £399. I checked the availability at my local currys store and it said that they had plenty at all my local stores. Rather than waiting a day or two from Amazon, I decided to order online from Currys and pick it up from my local store.

This is where the issues started. Currys website wouldn't allow me to create an account and gave me a number to call instead. I called the number and paid for the new smartphone over the phone. Within an hour or so I had received an email telling me that the phone might not be at my local store and telling me that they would call me to explain. They didn't call me.

This morning I called them and was told that they didn't have any anywhere and they were unable to tell me when they would have them in stock! I asked them to refund the money immediately so that I could buy one from Amazon. They said it would take 3-5 working days to refund the money. I went a bit mad and they told me a manager would call back. The manager called back and told me that they had some in Preston and it was only an hour's drive from where I live. I calmly told them that I was an active member of the consumer action group and that I had the CEO of Curry's email address in front of me. I suggested that they have the phone sent by courier to my house, or my local store, today. I was very polite.

She said that she would see what she could do. She phoned back ten minutes later and said there were no phones anywhere in the country!

Now I have no phone and not enough money to buy a phone that I need desperately for monday.

Can anyone suggest a course of action? Surely, stating availability in order to get a sale is bordering on criminal activity!?

very angry.

Edited by Mike W68
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately you may be at their mercy in some respects, the terms and conditions clearly state:

 

Exchange/Refund: We will then give you an exchange or full refund. However, we do have the right to retain any charge paid for services which have already begun or have been completed. Refunds take 5-7 working days to be credited to a payment card.

 

They also go on to say:

 

Our contract after you have ordered

 

Firstly, don’t panic if you make any mistakes during your order, you can correct any input errors right up until you confirm payment.

Once you’re happy everything is correct and you’ve submitted an order you’ll be given an Order Reference Number and details of the products (and/or services) you have ordered. You’ll then receive an email headed ‘Order Acknowledgement’ recognising receipt of your order. We will then send a further email headed ‘Order Confirmation’ and this is when our contract with you begins. This second email also lets you know how your products will be delivered to you. If we have to cancel all or part of your order for any reason, we will email you to let you know.

 

If you choose our Reserve and Collect service you will be given a reference number and details of your order. You will not be asked to pay until you collect the goods from your chosen store.

 

Because all Reserve & Collect sales take place in our stores, sales are subject to the normal in-store terms of sale, statutory rights and the Manager''s discretion. Just take your Reserve & Collect print out and/or reference number with you and our store will sell you the goods at the website price or store price, whichever is cheaper.

 

Sometimes we have to hold our hands up and admit we have made a mistake by unintentionally publishing inaccurate information on the site (e.g. the price, description or availability of a product you have ordered). In this instance we may have to cancel your order at any time up to the point we send you the product(s), even if you have received your Order Confirmation email, and you will receive a full refund of any charges already paid.

 

http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/terms-and-conditions-1044-theme.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arghh! But when I called them to reserve they said I had to pay for it over the phone! They didn't follow their own procedures because they say that you don't have to pay until you pick up the item in the terms and conditions.

The cynic in me says that their website was conveniently innaccurate and that they are getting the money in the bank by telling people that the stock is available when it isn't. I asked the salesman on the phone and he confirmed availability.

 

Still furious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understably you're unhappy but I'm guessing the salesman used the same information that you did in checking availability so an error in the website would show as an error with them.

 

Is there an alternative phone / cheaper one or even your old one to keep you going? Sometimes there's a good argument for a slightly better phone as a measure of goodwill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

use chargeback!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing he did, but he shouldn't have said that I had to pay over the phone, when that is not the stated procedure.

 

My old one is destroyed unfortunately. I've had to buy a tescos cheap phone to see me through, so Currys have cost me £20 already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell your bank Currys have taken the money and failed to deliver the good and you require an immediate charge back.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bank said there's no such thing as an immediate charge bank and that it could take up to two weeks! They have given me an authorisation code for the transaction which they said might speed up the refund a little.

 

I'm absolutely powerless to do anything about this - they have my money and I have no phone until they refund me and I go somewhere else.

 

Disgraceful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many banks say it's impossible to do, they are wrong I have done it and so have others.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many banks say it's impossible to do, they are wrong I have done it and so have others.

 

They didn't say it was impossible, they said it could take two weeks. They said it would be quicker to wait for the refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I worked for a bank a long while ago, a chargeback I had to fill in a form and it would take a couple of hours to credit, although we advised up to 24 hours to credit.

 

Currys have a rep on this forum, if you ask for this thread to be moved to the Currys sub-forum maybe he will pick this up and be able to shed some light on the issue?

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Well something I would consider challenging Currys on is:

 

In those Terms & Conditions it states 'Exchange/Refund: We will then give you an exchange or full refund. However, we do have the right to retain any charge paid for services which have already begun or have been completed. Refunds take 5-7 working days to be credited to a payment card.

 

Please note the 5-7 working days that is important - remember you have paid into currys Bank Account so during that 5-7 working days that money is collecting interest at currys bank before you end up getting your refund.

 

So are currys going to give you a full refund plus that interest gained from the date you made that phone payment which will be more than 5-7 working days for the actual refund while in their bank account and just think how many people they do this to it seems a nice little earner for them.

 

So your payment has been collecting interest from the day you made payment to currys, then add this and the 5-7 working days for a refund but you only get a full refund and they keep the interest that it gained while in their own bank account.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

the op decided he wanted to start the thread here see post 1....

 

as for the chargeback

stay on the phone

go upi the chain till you get it

 

DONT be fobbed off

 

90% of bank staff have NO IDEA what it means

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

currys t & cs cover mistakes over stock avail, so no criminal activity there. as for your resolve. if no stock, then full refund. or choose alternative. mistakes do happen, oh well

 

Sometimes we have to hold our hands up and admit we have made a mistake by unintentionally publishing inaccurate information on the site (e.g. the price, description or availability of a product you have ordered). In this instance we may have to cancel your order at any time up to the point we send you the product(s), even if you have received your Order Confirmation email, and you will receive a full refund of any charges already paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have been better off with Amazon. They might be big and evil but they have a good customer service and excellent return policy.

 

Ha. Hindsight is a wonderful thing! My problem is that I believed currys when they assured me they had them in stock on thursday, only to tell me there were none in any of their stores at all.

 

They basically lied to me to get a sale and I'm furious. I have had to buy a phone from tescos that I can ill-afford and I have already lost a day's work as a result of their p*** poor customer service. They have my money in their bank.

 

Furious doesn't even come close to describing how I feel about the way they have dealt with me. I was talking to a guy this morning who said that he had had the same thing happen to him with another company, i.e. the website told him his product was available so he paid for it, only to be told that delivery was 13 weeks away. In the meantime, he had thrown away his bed because he thought he was going to replace it the next day!

 

The moral of the story is NEVER believe websites when they claim that stock is available and get a cast-iron guarantee before paying for anything in this way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't just the website that was 'making a mistake' though. The salesman assured me that the phone would be available for collection - is that kind of mistake also acceptable? Not in my eyes it isn't.

 

I'm sorry, but hiding behind a mealy-mouthed catch-all clause in the t+c doesn't wash with me. Currys told me they had the stock twice. Once on their websites (mistakes do happen blah de blah) and then once again over the phone by a genuine human being, who told me the phone wasn't in the shop today but would be the next day.

 

If I was able to tell my customers "sorry, mistakes do happen" every time I let them down, I would soon be out of business. In the meantime, my money is in their bank and I am unable to buy the phone I want.

 

I have had to buy an over-the counter cheap phone from tescos (£20) and have lost £70 because an agency couldn't contact me to offer me work. They left a message on my answerphone in the end, but I got the message too late - the work had gone to someone else. My phone was engaged because I was speaking to currys customer service at the time. That was one of three or four conversations I had with them yesterday at God-knows what cost. I waited for a call from them all afternoon to tell me when the phone would be in stock. That call didn't come and I had to call them back again. Guess what, currys will have none of these phones in stock for at least four weeks. I've cancelled the order and am now waiting for my refund before I can buy another phone.

 

Not good enough. I'm furious and will be writing to John Browett this afternoon, although I guess he will hide behind the terms and conditions, or offer me a sincere apology.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing happened with Argos, bought item over net collect at local store = fine minutes later text message item available from next Monday at store? Cancelled there and then.

 

So all they are doing is stating an item available, but not stating at time at the Local store, could have to come 200 miles to the local store,.more like a catalogue store system.

 

= lack of stock in the system to start with.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing happened with Argos, bought item over net collect at local store = fine minutes later text message item available from next Monday at store? Cancelled there and then.

 

So all they are doing is stating an item available, but not stating at time at the Local store, could have to come 200 miles to the local store,.more like a catalogue store system.

 

= lack of stock in the system to start with.

 

If the software cannot reliably inform customers of the availability of products in store, then it is not fit for purpose and shouldn't be in use. End of story. In my case, however, I was assured by a salesperson that the item would be in stock for me next day. It wasn't, so I haven't got my phone but they do have my money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The moral of the story is NEVER believe websites when they claim that stock is available and get a cast-iron guarantee before paying for anything in this way.

 

Now it will sound I am an Amazon sales rep, but not all sites are liars. On Amazon when it says it's in stock it's usually in stock, at least if it's Amazon warehouse. Currys/PC World have always had a bad rep, at least in my experience.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...