Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Post Office has plummeted from its position as Britain’s sixth-most-trusted financial, banking and insurance brand to 135th in the space of just 12 months amid public outcry over the Horizon IT scandal, new polling suggests. The company is now at risk of losing a third of its “heartland” older customer base, the study found, with the number of over-50s considering using Post Office services falling (by a third) in less than a year   Frankly, I'm astonished theres any trust left at all let alone that much   Trust in Post Office plummets following outrage over Horizon scandal WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Post Office at risk of losing a third of its over-50 customer base, Savanta polling suggests  
    • At the moment I can't explain everything. Basically my ex has said I controlled her money so couldn't pay her bills. Something that I can prove I have never done. She simply doesn't pay her bills just wastes money. Hence the reason I have been told to pay the bills. Bearing in mind when we lived together I made sure the bills were paid. After we split amazingly they were not paid and the bills solely in her name.
    • Every post of yours brings a pile of new information but little by way of explanation. It's like trying to put together a jigsaw with half the pieces missing. I cannot, for example, envisage any circumstances where a creditor tells you in writing that you aren't liable for a bill but your solicitor and the police tell you that you have to pay it anyway. All I can say to you is that you have to keep making clear to everyone concerned that there is no point in them keep telling you that you have to pay your Ex's bills when you don't know what they are or the account details. And that your Ex won't tell you. 
    • Wonder whos getting his 'safe' seat? ... still waiting for the announcement that Johnson the Liars carcass is being dragged back by the remnants of the same dead horses that dragged it out. ... should be dragged into the courts on multiple counts   New blow for Sunak as cabinet minister says he will stand down at election WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Chris Heaton-Harris, who has a majority of 26,000, is the 65th Conservative to announce he is leaving parliament  
    • I see Greater Manchester police chief defends decision to investigate Angela Rayner | Angela Rayner | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Stephen Watson says process will be carried out ‘fairly and impartially’ in his most extensive public comments on the claims   So when Is Johnson, Jenrick, cummings and a number of other 'multi homed' Tories who  claimed under lockdown that there country estates were their main homes so it wasn't breaking lockdown to go there - while voting in constituencies Let alone all the expenses for multiple homes claimed .. Let alone the following selling houses largely paid for by the taxpayer - and pocketing millions in profit as well  .. FOUR Tory MPs face Angela Rayner-style probes into tax affairs WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM No fewer than FOUR Tory MPs decline to disclose whether they paid tax on the sale of their taxpayer-funded 2nd homes.      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lloyds claimform - old tsb debt - Lost Case - agreed variation order - but DCa's keep still chasing to up agreed payments


Dorabell
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've had one of these also (see separate thread)

 

In terms of mine Lloyds do appear to have sold one debt that is subject to a court order but the Moorcroft one says transferred not sold whilst the other one does say sold - I think the point I'm getting to is it appears they can sell on debt that is subject to a CCJ but going off the other threads and my own it looks like Lloyds are sending a large number of older debts to Moorcroft.

 

Do you know thinking about this I may write to my MP and complain - after all the bank is part public owned (about 43% I think), surely it should be doing all it can to help us? Yeah right, and pigs might fly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 554
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ofcourse a creditor can sell a debt subject to a CCJ or a CO . GM

 

 

but until you get a notice of assignment you ignore the fleecing dca's.

 

 

as for the dead persons debt

I would have had more fun with that one...

 

 

get him to repeat that on film ... arrested my foot, !!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called the police l did not need the stress. They had been told enough but the police said they denied any knowledge of receiving the letters back. I told the police that l would want the person arrested for breech of the peace if he came here again.

 

When the police officer got back to me they seemed to no that they were a bunch of chancers as he was arrested at a neighbours round the corner who had moved in a week before me and the person had moved to a nursing home but been told. The guy has not been back since and Moorcroft has gone away.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

really little tike

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it as arrived letter from moorcroft telling me to get in touch cancell all standing orders the account will be managed by moorcroft and not lloyds they want a new payment plan :roll:

 

Shuddering...perish the thought :bored:

 

How are you Dora..long time no chat.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if Moorcroft have got their hands on it :-D

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well another letter arrives today from moocroft:-)

 

 

we acknowledge receipt of your recent payment against the above debt which we note was made direct to our client,

we would refer you to our recent letter which informed you that we are now responsible for the collection of your account and would therefore ask you to contactact us within 7days of the receipt of this letter with an offer of payment

 

 

it is inportant that all future payments are made directtly to us in order that we can ensure that your account is adminsterted correctly

this will assist in ensuring that no further collection activity will recommence

any payment must be attached to this letter and made payable to moorcroft ltd alternatively please contact deatails below

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope off and bugger Moorcroft

you don't own the debt

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Moorcroft idiot.

Thank you for you letter dated xxxxx.

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO MOORCROFT.

As per the court order dated xxxxx l will continue to pay lloyds at the rate of xxx.

Please find enclosed a copy of the order

Should you send any more letters to me they will be return to u with a brick attached.

Regards

Dorabell

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hope your well Dora. l would just tell them to foxtrot oscar but do what u think is best

 

Love GM

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

another letter :roll:

we do not appear to have received any contact from you in relation to our previous letter

we have now taken over the administration of the repayment account on behalf of lloyds bank plc

(they said that in the last letter ):roll:

we understand that you previously had a plan in place and we can confirm that we are happy to continue with this arrangement( yeah right) please contact us in the next 7days so we can confirm the repayment details and discuss your preferred method of payments

we must point out that we are committed to attempting to help you re-establish your previous arrangement or to agreeing an alternative arrangement that you can afford and maintain

How ever if you do not contact us you may leave us no option but to recommend to our clients that they consider taking further debt recovery action against you ( they already have taken this to court ):roll:

which we will involve us making further attempts to contact you via letter and telephone calls please do not ignore this letter if you need assistance please contact us

are these letters for real :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

not doing anything wrong in paying as per a court inst order.

until a 'third party' actually owns a judgment, then tough..not much that they can do without owning the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you minded about the tel calls?

if so, could consider writing to them telling them comms in writing only, remove any tel numbers, you are complying with the courts inst order....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

hi all

 

i haven't been here for a while😉 still having crap with these people sometime  in 2019 had another letter want to review your account,  sent them a nice letter 😏 explaining that this was being paid through the courts and not to contact me again as i was going through cancer i did not need the stress

 

then in dec 2019 then i got a call from a lady from lloyds about the complaint i had raised i told her that i do not want any more calls because off all the stress i was under with my treatment, she said she was going to make a note to say i was receiving treatment for cancer which i thought that would be the end off this matter,  i received a letter from lloyds bank thanking me for taking time to speak to me about my complaint  

 

here goes 

 

Im sorry for any upset or inconvenience you have experienced I understand you are concerned about the letters you are receiving from moorcroft you want the letters to be stopped as you are making regular payments per month agreed by the court

 

My Decision

im holding your complaint on the service provided

 

My findings 

i can confirm we have contacted moorcroft and the have explained the reason you have received the review letters is they were not aware the variation order was still in place with the court

 

they have confirmed they will be writing to you to confirm the payments are being received as agreed with the court

 

if i have any queries with regards to your account you will need to contact moorcroft direct which i never heard anything else till today 

 

hounding me again with one of their review letters

 

we now you are making regular payments, we want to ensure this remains appropriate any change to your financial or personal circumstances

 

if there is no change there is no need to contact us at this time

 

they're still hounding me  

the'rey lucky to get payments at all as i lost my job last year

 

what do you make of this 😒

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...