Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've added the particulars for easy reference which helps when drafting a response. You must either admit deny or question every paragraph in the claimants particulars. No response is taken as an admittance by the court.  
    • Sorry but I have been out of the loop on this for a while. I'm trying to get back and I'm going to have a closer look later on today. However from what I understand so far – and from other cases which I have looked at on the Facebook page, it seems to me that your contract is with the insurer. They are responsible for everything. I would refuse to sign anything with kinderton at this point and if they want to reply then they have to be told that your contract is with the insurer and everything will be done through them – and that you have no legal relationship with kinderton and no legal obligation and no legal responsibility towards them, kinderton. This would be my starting point. By trying to get you to sign directly with them, they are trying to establish some legal/contractual responsibility/liability to you – and as far as I can see, there is no legal basis which entitles them to do this. If this is what they want you to do – then this is certainly what you should avoid doing. If it is good for them then you can be pretty certain that it is bad for you.
    • N120  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/601bc2fee90e0712851bfd75/n120-eng.pdf
    • OH has received another call from Kindertons requesting a signature. He once again requested in writing that he was not liable for any costs as he has been told from the beginning. The woman insisted he would not. He asked her hypothetically what if Kindertons take the other party to court assuming they won't pay the hire charges, who would then be liable for the court fees and hire charges would it be him? The woman who apparently sounded like she was reading from a card replied not him. An email has now been received from Kindertons. I would be grateful for advice on this matter bearing in mind no forms have been signed. Good Morning Please keep this email as confirmation that no costs will be charged to yourself for the cost of the Hire. Whilst you are liable for the hire charges Kindertons indemnifies these losses. The third party insurer will pay the hire charges and if for any reason the charges are not paid Kindertons will not pursue you for payment of these charges. The only exception is if you knowingly and wilfully mislead us or actively fail to cooperate with our attempts to recover the hire charges from the third party insurer. If you would look to sign the outstanding Hire agreement it would be gratefully received. Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SCM Solicitors and LLoyds TSB Bank 2010.


banksdomyheadin
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon All,

SCM Solictors and Lloyds TSB Credit card.

I have a sealed consent order from 29th November 2010. I was up against "SCM Solicitors" in the County Court and I was ordered to pay £42.79 back for around 40 years, it works out!

From when I first started sending this monthly sum of £42.79 (January 2011) I have never received any form of statement, am I entitled to see something? In the schedule in item 2 - It states "When the defendant is in the position to do so, he will contact the Claimant's Solicitors (SCM) with additional or increased monthly payments".

I have never had any paperwork apart from the bank sort code and account number to pay to. I have cancelled the standing order due to go out next week.

 

Should I receive an annual statement? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them an sar.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...