Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I done a mock interview in a quiet little room on the other side of the building last week with advisor, didn't help one bit, she obviously couldn't wait to get there get it over with and get back, and at the end asked did I want her to book me in for another one, I replied 'no thanks I'll do one with 'jet' instead'. Pleased with that I was lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

been forced onto Community Work Placements (CWP) today by the job-center:x (that's another 30 more weeks wasted) after completing the WP i'm guessing that the same rules apply when i have my first meeting with them do not give the any contact info or CV or sign anything so it would make it harder for them to put you on a work placement

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, get this guys. I've just been contacted AGAIN by Ingeus, despite having signed off from JSA on mon' due to having to going on ESA (which Ingeus knows about) AND despite having now sent in a S10 TWICE (recorded)!

Received a missed call and text asking if I'd like to be put forward for a job I am UNABLE to do, even i f I wanted?! I've Just ignored the pleas from my now 'ex' adviser. Seriously, these people have no idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone number - block it from your phone so it cannot get through (may need to go via the mobile/service provider_

Email - use it as a filter so anything they send with '@ingeus' goes in to spam

 

Job done

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone number - block it from your phone so it cannot get through (may need to go via the mobile/service provider_

Email - use it as a filter so anything they send with '@ingeus' goes in to spam

 

Job done

 

Not bothered tbh, just find it amusing, now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive noticed a different approach frm jobcentre staff when i sign on the last few times they havnt checked my jobsearch an instead kind of sit back and ask me what ive been doing each week an how exactly did i do it an kind of tryin to prompt me into saying more as if fishing for info at first i thought it was just the one advisor but last 3 times ive seen 3 different advisors when signin on an all did the same so im guessing itr somthin management hav asked of them

 

 

My experience was exactly like this

3 different advisors who didn't even check my job search

all three were pretty good with me to be honest

but on my 2nd appointment with the 3rd advisor that's when the person who reffered me on the mwp was there

Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience was exactly like this

3 different advisors who didn't even check my job search

all three were pretty good with me to be honest

but on my 2nd appointment with the 3rd advisor that's when the person who reffered me on the mwp was there

you mean The Work Programme or Mandatory Work Activity?

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean The Work Programme or Mandatory Work Activity?

I was on post work program support

I was on esa with a for the full duration of my wp placement and did not attend

after ending esa I singed on to jsa and was put onto post work program as my placement at the wp had ended

I was on this for about 7 months and during the last 2 months is when I had new advisors who were not interested in my job search

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was on post work program support

I was on esa with a for the full duration of my wp placement and did not attend

after ending esa I singed on to jsa and was put onto post work program as my placement at the wp had ended

I was on this for about 7 months and during the last 2 months is when I had new advisors who were not interested in my job search

so are u still on post work program?

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest Facebook post from my so called adviser:

 

"Wish I was down the beach rather than being stuck in an office, where none of my clients are turning up cause there at the bloody beach!!!!"

 

Charming attitude, also, for someone that is supposed to help people with CV's etc she really should sort her spelling out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest Facebook post from my so called adviser:

 

"Wish I was down the beach rather than being stuck in an office, where none of my clients are turning up cause there at the bloody beach!!!!"

 

Charming attitude, also, for someone that is supposed to help people with CV's etc she really should sort her spelling out!

How come you see her posts? Just curious why you started looking?

Sands a good idea though or water or stones

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest Facebook post from my so called adviser:

 

"Wish I was down the beach rather than being stuck in an office, where none of my clients are turning up cause there at the bloody beach!!!!"

 

Charming attitude, also, for someone that is supposed to help people with CV's etc she really should sort her spelling out!

 

0ecba.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

We need all the ammunition we can get to use against these advisers - especially if they're stupid enough to publicly post personal remarks about clients which could cost them their job. As we know from cases covered in the press, the DWP definitely do check up on claimants' social media accounts so they can catch them out from the comments they put.

 

I'd also bet money the WP advisers do it too, in their search for ammo to obtain sanctions. Employers also do it to check what their staff are saying about them.

 

Everyone's at it :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest Facebook post from my so called adviser:

 

"Wish I was down the beach rather than being stuck in an office, where none of my clients are turning up cause there at the bloody beach!!!!"

 

Charming attitude, also, for someone that is supposed to help people with CV's etc she really should sort her spelling out!

While work programme advisers are sub-contracted to DWP to provide their schemes they are subject to the Civil Service Code same as the DWP’s own advisers are.

Link to the Civil Service Code:

http://resources.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/civil-service-code-2010.pdf

If you have got hold of comments like that and can prove who the author was it’s dynamite. A formal complaint to DWP and that adviser is history. I’ve counted half a dozen breaches and that was without reading more than a third of the leaflet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will ignore a certain comment - not worth the aggro.

 

How do I see her posts? Easy, she has a FB profile and it is FULLY PUBLIC i.e. not protected to friends only. I looked her up as a metter of curiousity - no crime in that. If they are going to play with people's lives and are stupid enough to have a public profile then they are asking for trouble. How can clients feel confident in their ability to help people when behind their backs they are being belittled?

 

No, it IS NOT stalking, a public profile means it is public and open for all to see - just need to type name in - not sure why I looked it was just curiousity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will ignore a certain comment - not worth the aggro.

 

How do I see her posts? Easy, she has a FB profile and it is FULLY PUBLIC i.e. not protected to friends only. I looked her up as a metter of curiousity - no crime in that. If they are going to play with people's lives and are stupid enough to have a public profile then they are asking for trouble. How can clients feel confident in their ability to help people when behind their backs they are being belittled?

 

No, it IS NOT stalking, a public profile means it is public and open for all to see - just need to type name in - not sure why I looked it was just curiousity.

How something that is in the public domain was found or seen is immaterial. The fact is that whoever posted it is in breach of the Civil Service Code. If it were me I’d consider it my civic duty to bring it to the attention of the appropriate authorities. If you have any qualms about using it yourself give it to someone with fewer.

I am seriously considering taking up this activity. Can't be more pointless than spending hours on UJ. Just think, with any luck everyone at the Jobcentre and at WP could be gone.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have FB friends who work for JCP. Not one of them has ever posted anything derogatory about a claimant on their feed.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously, if you can attest to that I'm glad to hear it, Atone. Occasionally, however, while waiting at the Jobcentre to be seen, I overhear some advisers gossiping amongst themselves and with security staff about individual claimants. They don't appear to be concerned who hears them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mat

I have to say that i took that sketch as a joke although yes it is sad to be searching the internet just to throw stones at people.

Like many people you were curious, i have done the same thing. I found several people i knew but they were sensible enough to restrict their profile. For gods sake i don't let my mum be a friend,she would have kittens.

I would report her. What she put is out of order.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously, if you can attest to that I'm glad to hear it, Atone. Occasionally, however, while waiting at the Jobcentre to be seen, I overhear some advisers gossiping amongst themselves and with security staff about individual claimants. They don't appear to be concerned who hears them.

 

They shouldn't do that - by all means mention it to the JC floor manager or write a letter of complaint. Oh, that won't miraculously solve the problem of course, but if enough people do it the staff might be emphatically reminded to watch what they say in public. But no, the only dodgy thing I've seen was someone bitching out about her boss. Not wise, but not the same as insulting claimants.

 

Initially, senior management wanted to ban staff from having FB accounts at all. This met with understandable resistance, but I think most staff realise what's appropriate and what isn't. The Civil Service does actually take its reputation seriously. That's one of the reasons why the idea of, say, sanction targets is so hotly denied (FTR, I believe they exist, but unofficially) as it calls into question the impartiality of the Service.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest Facebook post from my so called adviser:

 

"Wish I was down the beach rather than being stuck in an office, where none of my clients are turning up cause there at the bloody beach!!!!"

 

Charming attitude, also, for someone that is supposed to help people with CV's etc she really should sort her spelling out!

 

Why are you stalking your advisor? :?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure Mat can fight his own battles but he did explain that, he is not stalking , he was just curious. Have you never looked up someone you know or a friend of a friend to see what's going on. I have my advisors mobile number and she popped up when I did a search based on my contacts

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure Mat can fight his own battles but he did explain that, he is not stalking , he was just curious. Have you never looked up someone you know or a friend of a friend to see what's going on. I have my advisors mobile number and she popped up when I did a search based on my contacts

Exactly

I've nosied at some Ingeus staff who were not nice people in the past, I was just curious as to why and didn't mean any harm to the poster

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...