Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLC - Hillesden Legal Action - They wont remove default from my account (court action in-flight) advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,I had an account with Black Horse back in 2009, I DPA'd them last year and they had sent me 2 default notices one in 2003 and one in 2004. The debt was sold to DLC/Hillesden in the middle of 2010 and they are still processing the default on my account and they have stated they will do for the next 6 years.I have asked them to provide me with a copy of the default notice that they have sent me but what they have produced is a copy of the default notice from 2004. This expired in Jan 2010, what DLC are saying is that the 18th Jan 2010 I was in defualt with Black Horse so are continuing with processing my data (even though the defualt expired 2 days later).I have taken court action now to ask them to remove the defaut of which they have decided to defend (of which I am confused about to be honest as this seems indefensible)So my question is if Black Horse have issued me 2 defaults on the same account can they do this as I thought you could only default an account once.If so which default notice stands does the 2nd one superceed the 1st defaultAnd can the DCA extend a default that has lapsed and even though they bought the debt 6 months after the default has lapsed?Any help would be much appriciated, as I am about to have my day in court with these jokers! Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

And as far as I know the first default should be put on at some point in the near future from when you started to miss payments.

 

That then is the only default that should ever be added in regard to that debt.

 

Contact the CRA (credit reference agency) and tell them. They will get the information corrected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they have done this then they are in breach of the DPA, and you MUST make a formal complaint to the credit agency (CRA) in question, if they fail to remove this from your file (CRF) then you will have grounds to sue them for defamation, as well as the fools who have put this incorrect data on your CRF.

 

If the CRA does not remove the incorrect data immediately then make a formal complaint to the ICO.

 

This is the ICO's take on adding default markers to your CRF.

http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Detailed_specialist_guides/DEFAULT_TGN_VERSION_V3%20%20DOC.ashx

 

Here is how to make your complaint to them http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/data_protection.aspx

 

And here is what you will need to know to take these fools to court http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/taking_a_case_to_court.pdf

 

You should also make formal complaints to the OFT&TS via http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

 

Your local MP http://www.writetothem.com/

 

Ignore the above, I have just re-read your thread again and see that you have already taken legal action.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

I have an ongoing issue with Hillesden to remove a default on my account, I have instructed court action to remove.

 

The issue is that Hillesden is stating that a default notice never expires, Black Horse issued these defaults in 2003 and 2004 but they never attached them to my credit file. Hillesden purchased the debt in 2010 and used the 2003 default to default my account from 2010 for 6 years!

 

So if someone could help as all that seems to govern the defaults is the ICO and these are guidelines.

The ICO recommended that I should state "fairness" in the court case due to the defaults would of expired if the guidelines were followed.

 

So im a bit stuck and after advice!

 

I have copies of the agreement in photobucket but wont let me put a link in or upload the documents

either

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still stuck on this one...............any help would be apprciated

 

Hillesden are qouting that a default notice never expires I have spoke to ICO and they only have "guidelines" i.e defualt should be register within 6 months.

 

The issue is that I was paying until Black Horse defaulted by not supplying me with a copy of my CCA and I have also a complaint with the FSA but this was out of their

juristiction so was forwarded to the FLA. Black Horse sold this debt while in query and after doing a DPA the notes state the debt should of never been sold as it was being

investigated.

 

So im a bit stuck......court in a month!

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

an a/c cannot be defaulted twice

end off!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers!

 

Do you know where I can find out where it states this as I have been searching for ages and want something I can show the judge as Hillesden are very

much prove it!

 

they have also issued a counterclaim for the full amount of the debt!

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have all of the paperwork but cant upload as I have not posted 20 posts yet...!

 

If anyone can help around where I can find the info to back all of this up, as I know what everyone is saying is true but need to present it to the judge

This was Hillesdens' solictors that were spouting this! "tell me where it says that default notice has an expiry date" and "we could issue a default notice

everyday if we wanted" were his exact words in the usual attitude.

 

Also they have not updated my credit file monthly last time it was updated was 2010 every month has a D against the payment history!

And unfortunetly the ICO seem to want to sit on the fence and not offer up any real information on processing defualts etc!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ‘sale’ or assignment of debts on defaulted accounts

 

52 When the rights to a debt are sold to a third party, the lender has to make sure the records with the credit reference agency are accurate, up to date and adequate. If they want information about the debts to continue on the credit reference file they will need to come to an agreement with the purchaser about who is to be responsible for this.

 

53 If the purchaser agrees to take control of the record, the customer should be informed that the debt has been sold or assigned and to whom. The credit reference agency file should be changed to show the name of the purchaser and that the rights to the debt have been sold or assigned. The purchaser should then make sure the record is kept up to date including changes to the amount still owed.

 

The purchase should not affect how long the record is kept. It should be removed six years after the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Postggj

 

Compensation claim on the N1, court is in a month, counterclaim from Hillesden for the full amount.

 

I have offered a without prejudice out of court settlement to settle the debt and remove the default, they accepted the offer but

still wont remove the defualt so I removed the offer this was pre proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

alf is that from the consumer credit act or ico guidence? just wondering

 

Ali x

Btw I am no expert just give notes based on what I have read on here and other forums/sites, plus my own experiences and investigations.

 

All ccj's now dropped off file, 2 yrs to go to clear file.

All old debts either settled or made unenforcable.

 

RBS MPP-Full offer at 8 wks from first complaint

RBS Overdraft loanguard-full offer at 8 wks from complaint

Citicard ppi-with FOS finally paid 8 months after offer through FOS!

Capital one x2- with FOS

Monument ppi-with FOS

aqua x2 ppi-partialled settled still pushing for the rest

Black horse ppi-offers made and accepted except for one early loan they say no info held-still pushing for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the assistance everyone, I managed to find a free uploader and have blanked out the data but left the amounts in along with dates. The agreement was taken out on the 09/04/02.

 

I refernced Kaphoor vs Woolwich as the loss of credit.

 

Cheers

blackhorse2003defaultpg2.pdf

blackhorseagmt.pdf

blackhorse2003defaultpg1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

dlc/hillesden are well and truly stuffed

 

you have a valid default notice from2003

 

thats when it starts and finishes july 2009

 

dlc have no legal reason to continue the default

 

stick to your guns on this

 

the default ended prior to the sale to hillesden

 

 

when was the last payment made to black horse

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...