Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not an expert on Qatari Law but it seems so. That's 15 years for them to bring legal action against you in Qatar. Best option is just to ignore everything unless you get one of the 3 letters above.
    • Thanks for this. Am I right in assuming that there is a 15 year limit on action in Qatar?
    • Block and bounce back all emails.   Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • Dave if I run you by a different analogy.  Imagine you are doing 45 mph down Park Lane and a police car has clocked you doing that. When you get the Notice of Intended Prosecution they claim you were speeding in Piccadilly. So although you were speeding you weren't speeding in Piccadilly. Result -case would be thrown out. Same thing here. The contract refers to an area in Ruislip with a postcode  of HA4 OFY. On every  pcn  they have put the car in HA4 OEY. I admit that they have the correct postcode on the claimform but the car cannot be in two places at once. By pursuing Rocky on the wrong postcode means they had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for his details.Met does not have a contract to issue PCNs in that postcode. It is not desperation though it would be embarrassing for Met in Court and the case should be thrown out. The NTD can say whatever it wants but the NTK fails to specify the parking period and fails to ask the driver to pay S9[2][b] so that PCN does not comply with the Act so only the driver liable. And times on the photographs on the PCN are just that. Times on a photograph not on the PCN as stated in the Act.   Your strongest point is the PCN [the NTK ] is not compliant and as you were not the driver you are not liable so should go first.  Not only is it not compliant but the postcode on the NTK is different from the one on the Claim form. If the one on the NTK was wrong then Met have breached Rocky's GDPR since they had no reasonable cause to contact the DVLA as they did not have a contract  that covered that postcode and so misled the DVLA. That should be sufficient to win.  With regards to their WS sometimes the rogues leave it till the last moment to send to prevent Defendants being able to respond to what has been said. So don't send your WS until the last day. If theirs hasn't arrived by then add to your WS that their WS not received and ask that it be ignored.If it does arrive in time, then you can still amend your WS to answer any of their spurious points. As a lay person you will be granted a days latitude at least. PS do not foret to include S9[2][b] in your WS
    • Quote of the day “Head in hands and reviewing how useful my contact book will be in five weeks' time.” a Tory lobbyist, who’s not doing so good - Marie Le Conte
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells and Aktiva Capital UK chasing 14 yr old debt


PDTS
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3602 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, forum noob so be patient with me please.

 

I am receiving letters which I suspect is for a debt which is probably 14 years old but the letters do not have my current name on them.

I divorced then changed my name briefly due to my ex having debts I was being hassled for.

I am now known by my maiden name.

 

I was receiving these letters at my two previous addresses but always returned them 'not known at this address'.

I have just moved and I am now getting them here.

 

Advice please - I have not opened the letters and have never responded to any of them during this 14 year period and wondered if this falls into the statute barred category? Also, if they are not in my current name can they take action against me?

 

BTW I have checked the addresses on the back of the envelopes and they are from Lowells and Aktiva Capital UK and I have received 5 such letters in the last few days. Whilst checking the addresses I could see through the envelope and one of them claims I owe Barclays bank £360. I have never had an account with this bank. :eek:Advice please.

[/url] progress.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

ot known at this address'. I have just moved and I am now getting them here. Advice please - I have not opened the letters and have never responded to any of them during this 14 year period and wondered if this falls into the statute barred category?
Yes, send the SB letter. ;)
Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are now going to go back at them, I can't see an issue with opening the letters.

 

If one does say a debt for Sharkleys, you could send them a prove it letter.

 

As Cerb has said, send the other debt(s) the SB letter

 

Send ALL letters by Recorded Delivery and don't sign anything

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or you could just ignore them . They are only the dregs of such debt type companies , chasing after a 14 year old debt . I do not know if they are worth a stamp . If you do reply , and waste your stamp , you alert them to your presence and willing to take the bait of the worthless wretched companies tactics . From that alone , they may feel you are fair game . Best to let them continue in their futile and worthless pursuit unanswered .

 

If they go away , then that is that , the phishers have gone . If they do not go away , you will have built up a catalogue of threat letters from them upon which you can launch a blitzkrieg of complaint correspondence , of the like that makes them wish they never dared darken your presence with their bogus shadow of a 14 year old statute barred debt .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Also if they are sending you letters for debts you have never incurred chances are they have simply done one of their fishing trips & are chasing you simply because you have a similar name to another debtor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks folks. As I ignored similar letters at my previous address, I am going to continue to send them back 'not known at this address' - and why would I open them if they are not addressed to me? I have also registered that name with the Mail Preference Service. This woman doesn't scare easily :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I've had dealings with Moorcrap over 02. They tried to bill my dead father for an account we cancelled after he died. I tood advice from here and it was all good - thanks folks.

 

Anyway, I need some more advice please. I have received various letters from debt recovery companies over the years, but they are never addressed with my correct surname. I marked them 'returned to sender, not known at this address', However, today I returned home to find a hand written brown envelope on the doormat. I could see through the envelope the address on it was Scottcall, Glasgow with a handwritten invitation to ring a mobile number 'to discuss my accounts'.

 

First of all, the surname on the envelope isn't mine and doesn't even resemble it and secondly I have no idea what accounts they are referring to. Years ago I had some debts, but these are at least 13 years old. I haven't heard anything for years, never offered or made payment and I have moved house several times, but these letters arrive at various intervals. They are never addressed correctly and up until now no-one has ever visited. Any ideas on how to deal with this? I'm inclined to ignore it but don't want threatening visits from debt collectors who won't listen to my explanation. By the way, I do not intend to call the number!

Edited by PDawn
added stuff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, PDawn.

 

I've started a new thread for you.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I have posted about debt collection agencies in the past,

but now it seems the statute barred debt has been sold on once again.

 

I've had numerous letters over the years, the most recent last week which I shredded.

 

These letters are not addressed to me but they are in a name that I used after I divorced to get away from my ex husband and his debts.

 

Mackenzie Hall are just one of many trying it on for a debt that I'm not even sure that I owe

- the letters never say what it is for.

Anyway, it must be over 16 years old, so it is definitely statute barred.

 

I have moved several times over the years and the letters stopped when I moved to my current address.

 

Unfortunatley, my mother recently took a call from someone and she naively gave information which may have confirmed my address.

Strange again as her surname is the same as mine, is in the phonebook but nothing like the name MH are using.

 

MH are now calling my work phone number and leaving automated voicemail messages.

I think they must be ringing an old number that somehow gets diverted to my new number,

so at least the voicemail messages can be deleted.

I work for a large organisation, but no-one knew me for the brief period that I used the temporary name,

so I am at a loss to know how MH have my work phone number

unless someone on the main switchboard has put the call directly through to my voicemail.

 

I am concerned that should MH ring the main switchboard asking for me by my first name

that the call will be put through or worse still, be passed on to one of the bosses.

 

I do not want to have any contact with them but I don't wish my employers or colleagues

to know my personal business.

 

Help and advice please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them in the first instance to the FCA and Ofcom.

 

You could if you wished send them the telephone harassment letter, but I would really focus on getting those who allegedly 'police' this industry

to take action against them and bring them down a peg or three.

 

Calling your work is exactly the reason why these clowns need to lose their licence.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Calling your work is exactly the reason why these clowns need to lose their licence.

 

 

Agreed, but they wont, nothing ever happens. Either the Financial regulators can't be bothered or are in their pockets somehow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would be sending them a formal complaint as well as the telephone harassment letter. Within the complaint letter mention that this debt is statute barred and that collection activity should stop with immediate effect.

 

By making this a formal complaint, they have 8 weeks to resolve after which (if they fail) you can escalate to the Ombudsman.

 

While the FCA may not take any action, it is well worth reporting them anyway as the FCA will build a dossier of complaints and may (at some time) take action.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

A nice idea but the level of harrassment must be substantial and you still have to tell them to desist more than once before you can even contemplate going that way. Another tack is the incorrect data angle if they are after you under another name and they shoould kno that the data they hold is incorrect and they ahvent done anything about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice folks.

 

I'm reluctant to send the SB letter.

 

I always assumed that it wasn't wise to have any contact with them otherwise the debt is 'unbarred' and the 6 year clock starts ticking again?

 

I don't really want to reveal my real name because of possible harrassment of family living in the vicinity,

(although somehow they managed to find my mum anyway).

 

I don't trust them not to call my work number again either once they know they have reached me.

 

I don't have a reference number as I've shredded the letters and deleted the voicemail anyway..

 

...but I'm sure another letter will arrive pretty soon.

 

Isn't an SB letter admitting that I owe the money when I'm not even certain if I do or what it's for.

 

I think I saw mention in one of the letters regarding Barclays but I have never had an account there!

 

I'm not sure what to do now, once I receive another letter would you send the SB letter

 

but print the name they are using to try to contact me? :noidea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO something this old, as you say circa 16 years, is almost certainly SB, sending them the SB letter stating as such will NEVER reset the clock, as long as it is SB and you have made no payment or acknowledgement in the last six years then you have nothing to fear by sending the SB letter, it is clearly marked ''no debt is acknowledged'', send it, get proof of posting which is free from the PO counter, and if they contact you again demanding payment, you can report them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for the advice. They're ringing my ex directory home number from a whithheld number and leaving stupid automated voicemail messages now. How does that happen then? I never give my number out to anyone apart from friends and family :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...