Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics


firstship
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2626 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi IainHL. some good way to go(years) until zero balance due to substantially reduced payments,as and when this happens following your drift I will stop paying them,and sit it out until SB applies however ,that assumes I am still alive.and yes they are moving payments internally, crafty method of stopping SB.

 

The letter comes from Birmingham with a reference I have not seen before but not ARCH,.......why????

 

Spoke to CCCS they will send I&E,but the rest of the above,they will only take the moral approach,which I expected.

 

I will write to my creditors that payments to each will be reduced to £1 per month (have to leave CCCS to do this) due to financial circumstances and see if I can get the balances written off.

 

Thanks for your response FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Slick Hi

 

 

had a response from Natwest Loan Account,

 

 

this is and account where they have admitted in writing that they cannot find the contract,

 

 

but they applied a payment in March 2009 and have not defaulted the account.

 

The payment was the amount I pay towards my old bank account with them and they re-directed it to the loan account on this one occasion,

 

 

as I read it in March 2015 this will become statute barred?

 

 

as no other payments have been re-directed to this loan account

 

bloody mess

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have reached the stage where the loan element which is a separate account, of the debt has become SB,and there have been no payments credited to this account for 6 years,this is also the account that Natwest have put in writing they cannot produce an agreement to cover this account,it is pre April 2007.

What would be the best action to take? bearing in mind I have a Current account with them under a different account number,that I pay a small amount to each month and is interest free

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

It becomes statute barred 6 years after the last a payment OR acknowlegement of the debt. I see you made a complaint in Feb 2011 which could be construed as acknowledging the debt so it may not be statute barred yet. That aside, even if it is statute barred it just means they can't enfore it in court but the debt will still exist so I can't see how it would affect your position at present.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply,it is possible that my complaint Feb 2011 could be regarded as an acknowledgement of the debt,however as I have it clearly in writing from Natwest that they cannot produce an agreement for the account,I am not to concerned,so I will just leaves things alone.

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

with Natwest

 

 

I have 2 accounts

one a loan account

the other a current account,

 

 

I pay a small amount through a Free Debt Management Company .

 

 

Natwest Recoveries have lumped the 2 accounts together,

but still send separate statements once a year,

they only deduct my payments from the current account,

therefore the loan account amount has stayed the same for 7 years,

 

 

I have not contacted them for 6 years regarding the Loan Account.

suddenly the loan account amount has appeared on a CRA.

 

 

I asked Natwest why?,

their reply was it is part of a debt,

to which my reply was I have not paid 1p into the account and it is statute barred,

 

 

they reply NO they have joined the 2 debts together, as that is what they always do.

 

 

CAN THEY DO THIS,

I did not at this point mention the fact that they cannot produce an agreement for the loan account.

 

Sorry if I have been down this road in the past,

 

 

just trying to get up to date with the law/legislation

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello firstship

 

I am not an expert, but if NW have three accounts,

all seperately numbered for you,

then they will need three agreements signed by you.

 

In my experience,

I never got current account statements,

unless I issued an SAR,

only ever get annual loan statements.

 

 

All payments I controlled into two separate accounts,

 

 

so NW did not have opportunity to "create" a thrid account.

IHTH

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which account are the " Free debt management Company " specifically paying to ? Loan or Current Account overdraft?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy Hi,they Natwest only quote the current account number,there is no mention of the loan account anywhere,and then each year I get a statement for the Loan account,and the amount has remained the same for over 7 years.However Natwest state it is part of a debt and they Natwest Recovery always add all debts together,and will not accept that the loan account is Statute Barred.

 

thanks

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

" but still send separate statements once a year,"

 

Obviously under each account number...you need to confirm with your DMP that payment must be only made to the current account number......let Nastyvest do what they wish ...you keep your own accounting system and when the balance of the CA is clear or you have made enough payments to cover that debt... stop payments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy thanks for your reply I will instruct the DMP to ensure they only pay that (current account) number,and as you suggest when the day arrives I will stop paying Natwest anything

 

Regards

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb: I would do a quick reccie and see how much you have already paid against the balance of the overdraft so you know exactly how much and long to pay for.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy.. Will do,makes sense to be prepared,have already checked to ensure Natwest have never quoted the loan account number to the Debt Management Company,and the answer is never

 

thanks for your help

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Would like to ask the 3 questions reference CRAs

 

(1) Statute Barred = 6 years of NO payments,NO acknowledgement of debt,Creditor cannot apply for a CCJ.and CRA/Creditor not allowed to register the debt,although the debt still exists you do not have to pay anything.

 

(2) a Debt that you are still paying back with an amount outstanding,after 6 years CRA/Creditor not allowed to register the debt.

 

(3)a Debt that you are still paying and the Creditor states NO DEFAULT ever registered,still not able to register on CRA after 6 years

 

Can the experts just clarify that these statements are correct

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

for 1, the debt still exists but nothing can be doen to enforce it.

 

 

Some companies are now delaying issuings a default notice to extend the period the debt appears on your credit file but if 6 year have past then they are too late to do that without getting into bother.

 

2/ if the debt shows the correct dat the it can be added late but again, not after 6 years as that is unfair processing of the data.

 

3/ again, it is what is fair and after 6 years have passed it would be unfair to do so.

 

 

In all of these cases you should ask for the unfair processing of your data to cease and remove it from your credit files.

 

 

there are guidelines that the creditor has to above by if they want to continue to offer credit so they should remove any such markers or risk a complaint to the FCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

some are doing this on purpose as they know that if they default at the correct date it drops off the credit report but by deliberately delaying issuing a defaultt hey can try and stretch the whole thing out to 11 years and a bit.

 

 

The CRA's could refuse to put up with this abuse but they know who pays them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be aware that there is nothing stopping a claimant issuing a claim even for a debt that is SB. If they do then SB is an absolute defence

 

The reason they may well issue a claim is the vast majority are never defended.

 

It is all a bit technical, once defaulted a new default can not be entered so once the first one has 'fallen off' your credit file that is it. A lot of companies do not default the account, particularly if a payment arrangement is in place.

 

I had one that didn't register a default because 'we didn't start reporting to CRAs until xxxxx' however when challenged they admitted that the date they were going to register as the default was appropriate for when the account went into default- they do try to stretch it to the last possible minute - i think just to play games

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

can I just confirm how accurate this statement is from a bank.

 

I asked the bank to remove all details from all Credit Files as the debt in question is now 8 years old and regular payments have been made.

 

Bank reply "Our records indicate your account is still open and currently in debt hence we are unable to amend your credit file"

 

Is the bank correct or incorrect

 

thanks in advance

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

it should have been defaulted after your third missed/short repayment

so its not defaulted?

should it have been?

if not then they are sadly correct

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk

thanks for your reply,

 

 

it was defaulted 8 years ago,

and I agreed to pay a specific amount which they accepted through CCCS/Stepchange,

although the amount they show as a monthly payment on credit file's is the amount I was paying 4 years ago,

 

 

today I only pay £5 per month,with their agreement through Stepchange.

 

Do you feel they should still be showing the details on any credit file?

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by it was defaulted 8yrs ago?

 

you mean there is a default registered for that date on your credit file?

or

 

or that's when the repayments through CCCS started?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter of Default from the bank, 8 years ago and then over the subsequent months arranged to pay the bank back through CCCS/Stepchange, DMP,.

 

4 years ago my ability to pay the original monthly agreed amount became impossible and through Stepchange agreed a much smaller payment amount which was accepted,

 

I have been paying the DMP for nearly 8 years,

and it was my understanding that even though I still have the debt and have been paying the bank back after 6 years it would drop of my Credit File??

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...