Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest-dont Let Them Get Away With It.


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5285 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had some movement from Capquest

 

First after I send the letter and it arrived the phone calls stopped.

 

I received 3 letters following my letter:

 

1st For all letters:

 

None is with a real signature. Only badly pasted in signature pictures.

 

Only the letter with the NatWest copy states a printed name under the signature.

 

2nd The 1st letter

 

From Their "Collections Administration Department"

 

Only stating that the account is on hold for 28 days and acknowledging the receipt of my letter.

 

No real signature and no name stated.

 

3rd The 2nd letter with an 'NatWest' copy attached

 

From Their "Collections Administration Department"

 

The only letter stating a name (Martin Best) but still no real signature.

 

The NatWest copy does not look like a copy it looks like something I could do better. It definitely looks not like a normal NatWest letter with letter head, only a simple letter with NatWest logo cheaply copied and pasted in one corner.

No printed name on the copy and no real signature.

Now the details are real as in the Acc. Number and Branch details.

Another thing it states that the account was assigned on the 31st of May 2007 but on the Statutory Demand from their very first letter it states

date of Assignment 30 Oct 07.

 

4th The 3rd letter with the supposed arrangement to repay.

 

Again no real signature and no name stated just "Collection Administration".

 

Firstly it does not say for how long well we have to calculate how long 13100.72 by monthly rates of 200.

They deducted the 200 I already paid and took the 22nd as pay-day.

 

No real terms and conditions!

 

No mention of any "down-payment" they wanted over 3500 or 4000!

 

Now the disturbing bid:

Any default will render the arrangement invalid and the full balance will be pursued. Of course there should not be any default but some unforeseen circumstances could happen or what about if the bank screws up.

 

Now the most disturbing bid:

It states:

"This arrangement will be subject to review at our discretion and may be terminated at any time by us without notice." So basically they can change their mind at any time and without notice ether demand the full balance or do a petition for bankruptcy! WTF???

 

Now I really could do with some professional help. I have all those letters in pdf-format so I can email them. I don't know how much the Citizen Advise Bureau can help.

If anybody knows a place to go in and around London or a Solicitor who has experience with Capquest or similar I would really appreciate for some help.

 

 

Macaca you could do with having your own thread to get some response on this.

I will sort you one out and move this from here.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well done to those who have seen results.

I have good news to report-I have also finally got them off my back and forced them to cease,following the Pre action Court protocols letter.Continue to send this since it addresses many issues which they clearly have difficulties in complying with,if there is no real substance to their demands,or they cannot properly seek collection whilst remaining in compliance of regulations.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For anyone wishing to follow Macacas progress or assist further-then go here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/168528-macaca-capquest-assistance-req.html

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done to those who have seen results.

I have good news to report-I have also finally got them off my back and forced them to cease,following the Pre action Court protocols letter.Continue to send this since it addresses many issues which they clearly have difficulties in complying with,if there is no real substance to their demands,or they cannot properly seek collection whilst remaining in compliance of regulations.

 

Excellent news Martin. :D

  • Haha 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DK yep-its in my first post in this thread with the other letters.Its clearly headed so you should see easy enough.

 

I have had success with both Hillesden and Capquest following sending this-both now closed files.

 

Tweak it for anything that does not apply.

Martin

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

just a little boost to those fighting the not so mighty CapQuest.

 

They chose to butt in on my dealings with Cap1 and irritated the heck out of me. So, I waited, and waited for them to shoot themselves in the foot and they duly obliged.

 

They have now closed my file and I seriously doubt I will hear from them again...woohoooo :D

 

If it is any help whatsoever, if they are chasing you for an account that you can prove was in dispute BEFORE they got their claws into you, then tell them so. It worked for me!

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to hear it.;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY HAMPSHIRE TRADING STANDARDS:

 

When a consumer complains to Consumer Direct (the national consumer service) about a business operating from Hampshire, including Capquest, we are notified of the incident. We monitor all such complaints in order to identify trends, the target resources in the most effective manner. Unfortunately, we are unable to deal with individual complaints levied against Hampshire business unless: (i) the complainant is a resident of Hampshire, or (ii) a referral is received from a trading standards service in whose area the consumer resides with a request that the matter is raised with the business.

In order to lodge a complaint against Capquest, consumers should either contact Consumer Direct on 08454 04 05 06 or write to their local trading standards service. Consumers can find the address of their local trading standards service by entering their postcode into the search form at the following website: www.tradingstandards.gov.uk

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Alan,I should have updated this as per your post.

I spoke with the person in question recently,who advised me to amend the details here.Apparantly they have been inunidated.

I just did not get around to making the changes in the stickie,and will do this soon.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems Capquest are becoming more aggressive in their tactics when challenged for SD set-asides.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm taking Crapquest to court! Fight them all the way!

 

I CCA'd them 3 moths ago and they can't get the CCA from Skycard so they've finally closed my account (£8000) after "a few" threatening letters from me. They won't remove the default though so I filed for a court order under S(14) DPA 1998 to force them to remove it. I bet they remove it first rather than unsuccessfully try to defend the claim.

 

I had all those bankruptcy demands from them as well. Just fight them every step and hopefully they'll be the next Lehman Bros!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems Capquest are becoming more aggressive in their tactics when challenged for SD set-asides.

 

 

 

in what way tig?

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to be sending letters challenging costs on the basis that defences are taken from "websites" or that they are not reflective or stating they may withdraw their offer to accept the set-aside if costs are claimed.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

(As previously posted in another thread)

This might not be totally related to this thread, but hey ho.

A neighbour has just knocked on my door with a telephone number, she said theyve had several calls from this number saying that theyve tried delivery parcels to me and was she aware if i was still living there or not. Firstly this neighbour is ex directory so how they got her number ive no idea, and secondly why are they making what i can only describe as a 'dodgy' phonecall asking for my whereabouts etc..

Ive managed to trace the number to someone called Telegrams apparantly its connected to capquest.

Hmmmmmmmm.... their office is now closed, i shall be calling them first thing monday morning, then if i dont get a sufficiently satisfactory explanation from them then i shall take it further... what a bunch of muppets. grrrrrrrrrr

Link to post
Share on other sites

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES phone these Cretins from your phone or any phone for that matter. They are seeking confirmation of your address so as they can start sending you their threatening letters demanding money that you may or may not owe. There is no package. Its a phishing trip and whats more its unlawful. Ignore these cretins until the put something substantive IN WRITING

Link to post
Share on other sites

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES phone these Cretins from your phone or any phone for that matter. They are seeking confirmation of your address so as they can start sending you their threatening letters demanding money that you may or may not owe. There is no package. Its a phishing trip and whats more its unlawful. Ignore these cretins until the put something substantive IN WRITING

 

Ive no intention of phoning them, that will just confirm to them that I have rec'd the message from the neighbour and therefore am living at the address they thought. Im not trying to wriggle out of paying a debt, they call me frequently and continually ask me to confirm my personal details, which i refuse to do to 'anyone' over the phone. I tell them that they can write to me but all they do is send a letter with a phone number on asking me to call them, then it starts all over again with a request for personal details....

I think half the reason they called the neighbour is too try and embarrass me into calling them.. Thing is this neighbour is ex directory so unless theyve had some dealings themselves with this company then how have they got their tel. no. ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes unlawful under the 2008 unfair consumer terms regs-in addition to OFT DC guidelines.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Having fun with CapQuest

 

My Solicitor has told them the credit agreement is unenforceable

 

but CapQuest insits there is a debt and as such will not remove the Default on my credit file.

 

The outstanding balance consists of over 51% of charges

 

I have written to trading standards which have been in contact with capquest, but still CapQuest do not comply with my request

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Guys

 

They are still at it...friend just started receiving phone calls - no letters - from a cheeky get demanding payment for a credit card she doesn't remember and he told her the last 'movement' on the account was 2001.

 

Still tried to bully payment from her, will do up the right letters for her but everyone please continue to report them.

 

Their consumer credit licence is due to expire in about 6 months - time for us to complain to the OFT big time!

 

 

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration Number Capquest Debt Recovery Limited03772278

 

 

 

 

Issued Date: 30-Oct-1999

Expiry Date: 06-Jan-2010

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

sorry don,t want to jump on another thread, but im struggling with a SD demand from Capquest which now listed for hearing in the county court Nov 09, but they have applied to have my defence struck out will be heard on the 27/08/09, even though they have not replied with info requested under Cpr and sar notices, heres my tread could do with the help ..thanks Halifax credit card sold to Capquest...Help - Penalty Charges Forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank God for this thread! I thought Capquest had taken on a personal vendetta against me (lol!)

 

I have two seperate issues with them, didnt receive a CCA in response to the s.78 requests & they have continued to send collection letters since the accounts went into dispute. HL Legal have waded in too. One of the debts is definitely statute barred as well.

 

Thanks for the Hants TS contact info; will complain this weekend

 

Regards, EC

"Evancosmo" is short for the evanescent cosmopolite.

 

THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE :rolleyes:

 

1st Credit: CCA request sent

Cabot: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Capquest#1: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Capquest#2: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Abbey: on going

Equifax: "attributable data" CCJ removed - Aug 09

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...