Jump to content

esmerobbo

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    1,124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by esmerobbo

  1. Who fitted the clamp, have you any paperwork? I really doubt that this is for an unpaid parking charge. If it is then its a criminal offence to clamp.
  2. Your evidence is that they issued a NTK 85 days after the ticket was placed on the screen. A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid, must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver.
  3. PE use LPC law to represent them who will appoint a local bod to attend. They have not been very successful in claiming costs in all their reported victories, they don't talk about their loses!
  4. If you acknowledged the claim and stated you wish to defend in full then it should've been transferred to your local court.
  5. You really need to research this one as if it does go to Magistrates it could become expensive. If you google "Debt Recovery and Prosecution Services" you can see quite a few of these issues but none have reported actually receiving a summons to court.
  6. Do you still have the PCN, and does it mention Byelaw 14 anywhere on it, we have seen these before where PPC's threaten byelaw 14 prosecutions but I can't recall one from the company themselves. I have only ever seen real byelaw 14 tickets issued by Northern rail, these can get expensive if taken to court. Have you contacted them at all? Railway byelaws https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/4202/railway-byelaws.pdf
  7. That looks like its mounted on the signed car park but is pointing at the entrance to the unsigned one is that right?
  8. Parking Collection Services, AKA Debt recovery Plus, AKA Zenith collections. Letter churners, they will send a few letters then go away.They cant do anything more then ask. Minster baywatch tried court a couple of times and got severely smacked so I cant see them hurrying back to try again.
  9. ericsbrother is right find where those cameras are, as you can't make them out in the pictures you posted.
  10. No doubt if you spent 5 hours you will have spent some money and have receipts? If so enclose copies of them with your appeal you then have a better chance of them cancelling, however if they don't see sense you can then win at POPLA. Euro are one of the tamer PPC's relying on the percentage they get paid rather then chase people through county courts. (at a loss even if successful)
  11. Just read the link, maybe she should have done a bit of research before giving that interview and definatly before issuing claims.
  12. Great result I know you were up for the fight but its done now and all dusted, although you had plenty on your side, county court can be a bit of a lottery. Plus I am sure you have better things to do!
  13. No complain to the DVLA about them writing stating that they are pursuing you under POFA yet they did not meet the deadlines to issue a NTK. They can still request your details at any time but now they cannot use POFA keeper liability. At this point you just need to state you intend to defend all of the claim.
  14. They have timed out, now usually the BPA are useless but in this case I would email Steve Clark at the BPA SIP have been doing this a lot and have been told to stop by the BPA. [email protected] The case I mentioned above was stopped for the same reason, they have no course of action against the keeper. I would also complain to the DVLA as they are abusing POFA. [email protected] This is normally a waste of time but SIP have history for this. Also is the claim signed by Natasha Sarwar as it also seems whoever that is is over stepping their authority ie: not a solicitor. In the meantime acknowledge the claim and say you intend to defend in full.
  15. So Trev could not substantiate his companies payment of damages to the landowner! How odd!
  16. OK without identifying yourself. Was this incident after 1st October 2012? Was this an ANPR issue or was it a ticket on screen? If ANPR did the notice to keeper arrive with 15 days of the incident or 56 days if it was a ticket on screen? SIP have just dropped a court case because they did not follow the necessary criteria.
  17. I would contact Lidl again saying you have done as they requested taken the matter up with Athena, proved you were a genuine customer, yet they still want you to pay £20 for the privilege of spending money at Lidl.
  18. If they are changing them shortly it matters not, the old ones are the ones that are relevant to this matter. Make sure you keep a record of all these obstacles they are presenting.
  19. Dippy Trev (owner of ANPR Ltd) thought his wording circumnavigated the actual costs recovery part of any claim ie: you could not say it was not an actual loss because he has to pay the Landlord. However except for him we all know its garbage.
  20. How many days after the event did you receive the notice to keeper?
  21. I would send copies of the two receipts over its best to try and get rid of the problem as quickly and as easily as possible, most contracts have a genuine customer clause in them meaning that the PPC will cancel, if it is proven you are a genuine customer. Some like Parkingeye for some reason believe a genuine customer is only someone who spends £30 or more. Since the introduction of keeper liability Athena have never issued a claim, they are pretty tame but to save the letter chain send the receipts, if they want to play then you can then play with them.
  22. "I was not the driver" is not a defence if they have complied with POFA2012. When did the incident happen and how many days later did you receive the NTK? I would say in Athenas case if you have proof you were a customer they normally cancel it.
  23. Me thinks they know they have dropped one, if they enforce under byelaws it goes to the magistrates they get nothing, so like a lot of the TOC's they use the threat of byelaws to try and pursue civil charges. I think issuing this claim will come back and bite them!
×
×
  • Create New...