Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

esmerobbo

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,124

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by esmerobbo

  1. esmerobbo
    They have been known to accept admin costs to withdraw their claim it has cost them up to now about £20 and maybe an hours work! The advantage you have is if they go to court and actually win because they use an agency they actually lose money. If you would rather put this to bed and be done with it, and I can understand why you want too, its not everybodies cup of tea going to court no matter how informal it is. I would write to them stating you were using the surgery with proof if possible (the receptionist should be able to verify and give you something remember they work for you!) offer them the initial charge, the worse they can do is say no. At least they will come back with a counter offer, did the £60 raise to £100. Explain in your letter you were ill and did not realise you had to register your car. Another advantage you have is over the last couple of weeks PE's claims have been rather unsuccessful. A drawback for them in issuing so many when more and more problems with their claims will come to light.
  2. esmerobbo
    Did you admit that you owed what they were claiming? Or did you receive a default judgement?
  3. esmerobbo
    Forget the "without prejudice", it is irelavant that they say they have a photo of the PCN on the screen what is important is that there was none on the screen when the driver got back to the car. The first you knew about this was when you received the NTK. Simply emphasize that. A lot of ANPR ltd,s PCN's are self ticketers ie: someone a resident or an owner sticks the PCN on, they then get a cut if the PCN is paid. However they don't usually want to become involved in a confrontation so disappear sharpish. Send your appeal, you will receive a rejection asking you to reconsider going to POPLA, within that rejection they will hide the POPLA code. So make sure you come back when you receive the rejection letter.
  4. esmerobbo
    As long as there is no valid reason for the delay in them sending the NTK then a simple appeal as the keeper stating that the NTK was out of time to use POFA. Let them go take it up with the driver if they know them!
  5. esmerobbo
    Go with Old Snowy's appeal and delete yours from here. As I said in an earlier post do not identify yourself as the driver!
  6. esmerobbo
    That would not be possible, a debt collector would need to own the debt to take someone to court, since there never is a debt to own then they could never take action themselves, unless they have an in house solicitor. However even then the solicitor would be acting for the originator ie: the PPC. UKPC have claimed for many years that they have taken people to court, even had a rolling list on their website of successful claims, however several FOI requests to the MOJ have proven they have never issued a claim.
  7. esmerobbo
    DBC wasn't it you who questioned PE on their timing synchronisation a couple of years ago and they stated they were synchronized by the Rugby time clock. Two years after they turned it off?
  8. esmerobbo
    In your appeal write stating this is the first you have heard of this as the keeper, don't admit to being the driver write as the keeper, ie; "the car was parked" not "I was parked"!
  9. esmerobbo
    Unfortunately your best option is to pay it. It will at least show as satisfied, once you receive a claim if you don't defend it it will be granted as a default judgement. You could apply to have it set aside which would cost you £80 but I doubt a Judge would allow it if you tell them you just ignored the claim. 18 months ago was before POFA that would have been an easy defence at court, in fact CEL would not have taken it to a hearing if defended.
  10. esmerobbo
    Where did you get that PE were not ICO registered from? http://www.ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/DoSearch?reg=180549 Easy way to reset the appeal process tell your mother to inform PE that you were driving, they will then write to you. Appeal to them which will likely be refused unless you can produce receipts. Then appeal to POLA and win! I would not ignore PE they have been issuing claims like confetti!
  11. esmerobbo
    No only what I have posted hopefully we will hear more when the defendant posts. Case details. Parking Eye v Walkden 29/10/2013 case no. 3QT52338.
  12. esmerobbo
    £104 awarded to the defendant, seems PE turned up with a contract dated February 2013 to manage the car park. However the alleged contravention took place in October 2012. Then they produce a witness statement supposedly giving them authority to enforce parking charges signed but not dated! Judge was not best pleased with PE's solicitors presentation. If there is a plus side to all these PE claims is these cockups will no doubt be noted! So! £104 to defendant Plus £15 court fee £25 hearing fee £300 LPC law fee At least!
  13. esmerobbo
    They lost another in Barrow in Furness a couple of days ago, just waiting for the details, looks like another problem with their authority to issue a claim
  14. esmerobbo
    Two points first I don't think I have ever heard of Lewis debt recovery chasing parking charges, (however they could do) and £46.73 seems an odd amount for a parking charge. Are you sure you don't owe the Uni anything else?
  15. esmerobbo
    If it wasn't somebody who could make a splash then the attendant would have been believed no doubt by Smart parking. It's amazing how fast these things are fixed when bad press is involved. Mind you I would have thought a journalist would have known a private company can't fine you!
  16. esmerobbo
    There are many knowledgeable people who post on here and other sites, but I doubt many would be willing to be deemed an expert. They may well be an expert but sitting behind the anonymity of a computer could cause all sorts of problems. You can offer advice and point people in what you believe is the way to go, but it needs to be made clear that it is their own decision, and all advice should be taken with caution. I agree with Nev Mets post we need to stop sniping after all I think most of us are of the same thinking, even if we have a different approach to dealing with PPC's There are a few experts on here and other sites but to get their professional advice you would need to contact them through the correct channels. Research is your best friend!
  17. esmerobbo
    You are not worth the effort in continuing this waste of time. Hopefully we can meet sometime and I will continue in person! Awaits the removal of the last few posts!
  18. esmerobbo
    So who is my Buddy??
  19. esmerobbo
    There you go again who is my buddy? Do you know me? What do you add to anything except your Roxburghe escapades? Since you have been posting I have been a "Roxburghe spy" a "close friend of Gary Osner" and a "PPC troll", anything else you would like to add?
  20. esmerobbo
    ANPR tried to be clever with their wording stating they pay the landowner £100 if someone trespassers on their land. They believe that would be a genuine loss which they could recover in court. However the problem they have is any Judge would laugh at their argument. You can see why Trevor was a clamper before 01/10/12 he didn't need to think to attach a clamp!
  21. esmerobbo
    Correct me on what? Did I quote you? You may not say ignore them, however without trawling through your posts how many times have you said, "see them in court" "go to court you can not fail" or " My type of cagger lol.......Route one to court " I was agreeing with Tomtubby that every option should be taken to avoid court. "However stating that all lost cases are plants or your defence was not good enough, or the Judge was wrong doesn't help the person who is left with a judgement against them." That was a general statement not one to you.
  22. esmerobbo
    Allowed 10 mins? That can not be right what other conditions were on the site. I have seen one where you were allowed 15mins without a P&D ticket then you had to purchase a ticket which you redeemed in the store. I have never heard of a 10 min allowance.
  23. esmerobbo
    ANPR's famous we pay the landowner £100 because you parked on their land routine. What date did you receive the NTK letter from them? Is there a section about appealing this invoice?
  24. esmerobbo
    Parking charge = Private company no statutory legislation to back it up. Penalty charge = Local authority/police statutory authority behind them.
  25. esmerobbo
    As far as I am aware Euro have never issued a claim, they normally just use intimidation. A DCA can add as much as they like but they can not issue a claim, and if Euro decided to it would be for the initial charge, not with all the DCA addons. Regards your POPLA appeal did you appeal on mitigation? If so you wasted the appeal you should have come here for advice with your appeal.

Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...