Jump to content

esmerobbo

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    1,124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by esmerobbo

  1. Your wife would have been in court two minutes, it has been tried many times to try too hold the RK responsible, however they cant, if they could why have the BPA spent thousands getting clause 56 adopted in the freedom bill? By the way a county court is usually a DJ sitting behind a desk, not a formal place at all really! It was your wife's choice but sometimes you have to stand your ground with these people!
  2. I think who ever took it done you a favour, an unlocked car with your belongings in it, left on a petrol station forecourt, don't think there would have been much left if they left it there! You need to get it back as it will be racking up more money every day for storage costs!
  3. Their so called victories posted on their site are a joke nearly all defaults, a couple capitulated at mediation and a couple of wins after a defence but no reference to what the claim was for, except there own interpretation. Could well have been for someone who genuinely owed them money.
  4. Devere do seem to have some influence at Bournemouth county court! So if you do get a set aside move it away from there! Strange company Devere! Then again no one has ever nailed down who or what Devere is/are!
  5. The two I have heard about have been when they have evidence that the person was actually the driver, one were he said he wasn't and then posted on websites he was, the other when he said he wasn't the driver but had him on CCTV. If they have no evidence I don't think any one could convince a court that the RK was the driver. However if you were the driver it would not be a good move to tell a judge you were not! As stated just ignore them!
  6. Be careful what you post on here or other forums this company do monitor this forum and others. If you were not the driver then they have no cause of action against you, if they did want to go down the track of trying to convince a court that in all probability you were the driver at the time, their case would be weakened by you using other vehicles and others being entitled to drive the vehicle in question. This company have been known to try their hand at court and claim victories, whether they are genuine or not only they and the defendant knows.
  7. Spec1 can you show us or point us to one case were a charge posted on a sign has been upheld in a case for trespass?
  8. If you employed a security firm to protect your land they would supply that service for a price, that price is an ongoing cost to the business. It would need paying regardless of anyone trespassing, so its not an extra cost to the landowner.
  9. Sorry DRP = Debt Recovery Plus, what they do is interchange so you think its being escalated, when in fact its the usual garbage.
  10. Zenith are DRP ! DRP Company Registration No. 6774150 Zenith Company Registration No. 6774150 Look at the bottom of the letters!
  11. "IF YOU VISIT ELSEWHERE, BEFORE OR AFTER USING THE FACILITIES YOU ARE CONTRACTUALLY AGREEING TO PAY A FEE OF £100 DISCOUNTED TO £60 IF PAID WITHIN 14 DAYS". According to that clause you would never be able to go anywhere again without paying them!
  12. If you read the text it would seem that these cases were won by them! When people have sued them for the return of clamping fees, a whole different ball game then an invoice on a screen. Done correctly clamping is legal! ( well until the first of October 2012) "Court Judges sitting at both the Exeter and the Torquay and Newton Abbot County Courts ruled in PPS's favour dismissing the spurious and ultimately unsubstantiated claims made against them"
  13. Well done on having the charge cancelled, however it was never due anyway. Glad you got the vouchers! Glad I told you!
  14. Without going into detail is this for multiple parking charges? There was one similar posted on MSE for multiple parking charges only recently hence my question in post #5 It seems maybe this solicitor fancy's a chance with multiple charges. However it has been tried before and well beaten by Trethowens and Aintree hospital. NHS Aintree Foundation Trust v Perera Case no. 1UD12840 £1622.84 costs sought from 25 tickets. Hopefully Alexis will pick this one up and assist you.
  15. This the same one as posted on MSE? Or are we seeing NCP becoming aggressive?
  16. Ignore VCS any charge will then become £0. Or take the items you bought from Mothercare and ask for a refund so you can pay VCS. (Only joking of course) However I have heard of somebody who complained to Mothercare got the invoice cancelled and some vouchers from them.
  17. Ignore it! Is it UKCPS or UKPC that normally is a UKPC tactic?
  18. It is but you also give them permission to give it to anybody with a reasonable cause. If they are BPA AOS members that is deemed reasonable cause. You cant explain anything to them such as you were not the driver because they are idiots and act as such. Ignore Parking Eye.
  19. The UKCPS V LGFitters is interesting how did a company drive and park a vehicle? It would be interesting to see how many others from the lower bank of judgements have them set aside, as they all seem to be defaults. How many loses or set asides before they become vexatious litigants?
  20. I think it could well be as we see on many private car parks and indeed most hospitals. We all know what they mean but in fact mean nothing! Hence why we have seen PPC invoices given to blue badge holders parking on DYL's when if they were official they could park there.
  21. Looks like you can use DYL's without permission, or breaching copyright. Then I would have thought it would be difficult to copyright the painting of two yellow lines? The artwork of traffic signs is covered by a waiver and may therefore be reproduced free of charge, without the need to obtain permission, subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. From : http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/@motor/documents/digitalasset/dg_191955.pdf
  22. How are DRP going to litigate? They do not own any alleged debt, it is only the owner of the alleged debt or their solicitor who can litigate. However they forget to tell you that!
  23. You do not need to pay anything you owe them nothing. The only people who can fine you are courts! The only people who can charge parking penalties are local authorities! Private parking companies can try and penalise you but they can not. They would have to take you to court and win and as we are talking about Highveiw that will just not happen. I am ignoring two highveiw invoices at the moment tis easy!
  24. Who are Roxbourghe acting for? As BPA AOS members they can only pursue on behalf of another member. Unfortunately the hospital as Sidewinder states can do what they wish on their land!
  25. Usual letter chain all DRP can do is ask, usual 2 or 3 letters from them you may even be offered a discount. Ignore them along with PPS then your discount is 100%.
×
×
  • Create New...