Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

not been paid holidays and confidential information leaked


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1924 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i started over a year ago with the company and i was told not entitled to holiday pay as casual and 0 hours, so got not holiday pay at all,

 

recently had someone i know who use to work at a union and they asked about my job and i told them everything and they said no you're entitled to holiday pay

 

they showed me how to work it out and turns out I'm owed £300, told my manager who informed wages, had half my payment. rest next week.

 

But I'm wondering if i can get last years holiday pay owed to me as it works out at £100 owed?

 

also When I started a few days later i received a message of someone who I had not heard of in a long time, asking if I had started working for them,

 

I asked how they know, and they said they had a call from someone at the company asking about me! but yet no one knew i was working for this company that knew this person, (this person use to work for the company many years ago)

 

I've mentioned it to my manager who told me to ignore it, I kind of have but it really plays on my mind wondering what else is said to this person as we do not communicate, or to anyone else.

 

Since I raised my holiday entitlement Ive since been told that my Sunday shifts are voluntary and that should not be taken into account, (I mainly work Sundays as no other shifts during week, so no wages if I don't),

 

Ive been told my hair needs to be different in how I put it up (never had issues before) been made to feel guilty if don't take overtime, not had an expenses traveling to other shops like i was told at start i would but then they took it away as they found out I drive,

 

I've had £271 in expenses for parking alone and bus tickets, this would never have occurred as my contracted place is just around the corner.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are always entitled to Holiday Pay - If you are 0 hours - I believe it might be worked out Pro Rata

So they are making life particularly difficult? Is looking for another job an option with your location?

 

It seems they might be taking advantage of you - What does you contract say?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are certainly entitled to holiday - not holiday pay! There is an important difference. Payment instead of holiday is unlawful, although obviously it takes someone to complain about it and you aren't likely to do that! The only time that payment instead of paid holiday is lawful is when you are finishing a job.

 

That distinction is important, because it impacts on your question about recovering the previous years money. You weren't entitled to the money. You were entitled to the paid holiday. And paid holiday is "use it or lose it" - if you don't take it, then it is lost. Now I know you didn't know you could get paid holiday, but unfortunately, the law says that not knowing your rights is your fault- you have rights and its your responsibility to know them. So you can ask for payment, but you can't enforce payment.

 

As for the rest, well I think the writing is on the wall. You've worked there a year - even if you are an employee (which I can't be certain about), you have no employment protection. If you are truly casual, then you have even less! If they wish to tell you how to do your hair, then that's how you do your hair. Since you are casual don't have to accept any shifts, so if you don't want to work certain hours or locations, that's up to you. But they don't have to pay for you to go to those locations either. But I cannot see the basis for their argument about Sundays - that appears to be incorrect since all your shifts are voluntary! A casual worker doesn't have to accept any shifts!

 

I'm sure that they are being akward because you have realised that you are entitled to paid holiday. But I'm afraid that "being awkward" is unpleasant, not unlawful. I'd suggest that you get another job as soon as possible. I don't see this resolving happily, and much of what you want - the travel expenses in particular - you have no legal right to. So if you wish to refuse the shifts at other locations because of cost, that is up to you. But you'll be without a shift, and I suspect that is the point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ps, sorry I missed one point. Where you work, even if you could prove what you are saying, isn't confidential information. I'm entitled to phone anyone I like about you. It's up to them whether they answer or not! I frequently call people and ask about other people - it's part of my job! There's nothing illegal about that. Although I understand that it's the bigger picture you are really unsettled by. And you are probably right to be. Unfortunately, as I said, that's almost certainly intentional on the employers part, but not obviously unlawful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

deffo taking advantage of me, but i'm looking for other work need something with set hours, was offered it at another side and said yes, but my manager at contract job said no as i need them here for cover, but i was eager for the other one, and i tried to make it clear would be better for me, my area manager then said that i had sent a message to my contracted manager to say i didn't want it but i proof of other stating i do.

 

I'm upset as I feel as i was taken advantage of due to the situation at the time of taking employment.

 

thanks for the advice guys, hopefully new job soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you are describing isn't unheard of.

 

Unfortunately, within a single employer, even if another manager wants you, there's no legal redress if the employer says no.

 

In the end, it comes down to the luck of the draw.

Another employer, the more senior managers might support you. In this case they don't.

 

Given the circumstances, a new start would probably be preferable. It sounds like the kind of place that isn't going to hand out any awards for knowing (or learning of) your rights. That kind of thing can follow you anyway.

 

Given that your holiday is a pitiful amount (i'm sure that you don't see it that way, but in the grand scheme of things it is!) then any reasonable employer, and even a fair few unreasonable ones, would put their hands up and admit it was a mistake and sort it out without any fuss.

 

The fact they won't should tell you a lot about how they'd react over something more important than a small amount of money.

Edited by sangie5952
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree about union membership, if I am understanding the OP correctly, they pretty much only work one day a week. Unless they are on a lot more money than I think they are, even part time union fees may be more than they are willing to pay. It might be a false economy, but only they can decide that. Personally, I'd always pay the union and save on something else, but that's me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically paid leave is 12% of your hours worked for the year. Work it out and send them a demand they pay up. Shift pattern irrelevant. I disagree with Sangie on this point if you were denied the leave or told you werent entitled, tyou are entitled to the money in lieu

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree about union membership, if I am understanding the OP correctly, they pretty much only work one day a week. Unless they are on a lot more money than I think they are, even part time union fees may be more than they are willing to pay. It might be a false economy, but only they can decide that. Personally, I'd always pay the union and save on something else, but that's me.

 

Good points, Sangie.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically paid leave is 12% of your hours worked for the year. Work it out and send them a demand they pay up. Shift pattern irrelevant. I disagree with Sangie on this point if you were denied the leave or told you werent entitled, tyou are entitled to the money in lieu

 

Sorry but you are incorrect. Legally. The OP is expected to know the law. It's maybe not fair, but life isn't. This relates to annual leave which should have been taken last year - the law is also clear that leave not taken is lost unless there is a legal agreement to the contrary. And such an agreement can only relate to extrastatutory leave, not statutory leave.

 

And I will also repeat. Nobody is entitled to pay instead of annual leave unless there is an untaken amount of accrued holiday when the relationship is terminated.

 

That said, as I said, I agree that the OP can demand it. What they cannot do is enforce that demand. What you are suggesting is "fair" - but it isn't "legal". Sometimes you can get away with things. Sometimes you can't. But the OP would lose a court/tribunal on legal grounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...