Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
    • have a look at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx
    • sounds like lesley. They'll respond some rubbish I'm sure.  
    • Even if they have crawled back under the stone, remember they have six years to bring a claim. Let them know if you ever change address.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aviva - had a pension they havent a clue what they are doing!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI

Had a pensions with Aviva

 

when I wanted to transfer I was told fund was £2K,

when requested transfer was told information was in-correct and should be £36K,

got my 3rd party IFA to check and was confirmed as £36K,

 

after about to date 15 phone calls still have no conclusion from Aviva, apart from speaking to 3 different depts who were all very abrupt and eventually got a phone call to say pension pot was in fact only £2K,

No apologies no nothing,

 

in fact consider all people who I spoke to to be abrupt and totally unhelpful and got the impression that they had a mistake but nobody was man enough to own up,

 

eventually got a letter after making formal complaint,

which did not offer any apology or reason for the error apart from " human error ".

 

Have taken this up with Ombudsman as Aviva do not really care.

They have offered measly compensation,

but this does not even cover my time and disappointment

 

Has anybody else had the same problem.

Especially as they had confirmed an in-correct figure to me and a third party.

Has anybody else had this problem ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default Aviva - had a pension they havent a clue what they are doing!!

HI

Had a pensions with Aviva

 

when I wanted to transfer I was told fund was £2K,

when requested transfer was told information was in-correct and should be £36K,

got my 3rd party IFA to check and was confirmed as £36K,

 

after about to date 15 phone calls still have no conclusion from Aviva, apart from speaking to 3 different depts who were all very abrupt and eventually got a phone callicon to say pension pot was in fact only £2K,

No apologies no nothing,

 

in fact consider all people who I spoke to to be abrupt and totally unhelpful and got the impression that they had a mistake but nobody was man enough to own up,

 

eventually got a letter after making formal complaint,

which did not offer any apology or reason for the error apart from " human error ".

 

Have taken this up with Ombudsmanicon as Aviva do not really care.

They have offered measly compensation,

but this does not even cover my time and disappointment

 

Has anybody else had the same problem.

Especially as they had confirmed an in-correct figure to me and a third party.

Has anybody else had this problem ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not had this problem or dealt with pensions.

 

The advice is always get confirmation in writing and not hold so many telephone conversations that you are not recording. If you phone any company and they provide information. Get then to confirm it in writing. Take a note of the full name of the person you spoke to and what telephone number you called, so you can chase it up if necessary.

 

Aviva have to follow a standard complaints process set by regulators, so if your complaint is not handled properly, you can ask the FOS to not only review the complaint issue, but also the way Aviva handled the complaint. It is up to you to document the costs you incurred in dealing with Aviva and to provide full details to the FOS. The amount of compensation the FOS will award for inconvenience or disappointment will be small. Even for people messed around by Insurers after major claims issues, the FOS are not very generous.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife has two small pensions with Aviva and every few months they send a letter stating that they have done a trace with Capita for her address however we have been receiving correspondence from Aviva at this address for the past 8 years. Aviva are the most useless bunch of people to handle your pension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that Aviva monitor this forum, I guess not, or do they not really care ?

I think the do not really care, this seems to be the norm with Aviva as they have admitted to a further mistake with the amount in my pension pot, no apology just another mistake by them.

Ombudsman here me come .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support
I thought that Aviva monitor this forum, I guess not, or do they not really care ?

I think the do not really care, this seems to be the norm with Aviva as they have admitted to a further mistake with the amount in my pension pot, no apology just another mistake by them.

Ombudsman here me come .

 

Hi Rasdes,

 

If you have had a formal complaint raised and have now approached the ombudsman, then unfortunately we are unable to help further. In line with our regulators guide we have to allow the Ombudsman to investigate and deliver their findings. I'm sorry we can't be of further help than that.

 

Kind regards

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rasdes,

 

If you have had a formal complaint raised and have now approached the ombudsman, then unfortunately we are unable to help further. In line with our regulators guide we have to allow the Ombudsman to investigate and deliver their findings. I'm sorry we can't be of further help than that.

 

Kind regards

 

Dave

 

I would read "Ombudsman here me come" (or we come) as "I'm fed up, they aren't bothering to sort this out, and in frustration, I'm using the Ombudsman as a last resort".

 

If the OP has already gone to the Ombudsman (and they MIGHT have done), fair enough, but instead of just looking like you are 'washing your hands' of it, why not offer:

"If you haven't already gone to the Ombudsman would you consider giving me a chance to resolve this? You can still go to the Ombudsman after if you wish.

However, if you have already gone to the Ombudsman, I can't get involved as they forbid it whilst they investigate".

 

Are they the same message? probably, but one is likely to be perceived as "Hey, I'd like to help, but might not be allowed to if you've already gone to the Ombudsman", and the other as "Off you go to the Ombudsman, then, I'm washing my hands of this, but can 'tick the box' to say I've answered".

Waiting a week to reply also doesn't look very pro-active .........

 

How much does your firm get charged for each complaint to the Ombudsman (even if not found at fault??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support
I would read "Ombudsman here me come" (or we come) as "I'm fed up, they aren't bothering to sort this out, and in frustration, I'm using the Ombudsman as a last resort".

 

If the OP has already gone to the Ombudsman (and they MIGHT have done), fair enough, but instead of just looking like you are 'washing your hands' of it, why not offer:

"If you haven't already gone to the Ombudsman would you consider giving me a chance to resolve this? You can still go to the Ombudsman after if you wish.

However, if you have already gone to the Ombudsman, I can't get involved as they forbid it whilst they investigate".

 

Are they the same message? probably, but one is likely to be perceived as "Hey, I'd like to help, but might not be allowed to if you've already gone to the Ombudsman", and the other as "Off you go to the Ombudsman, then, I'm washing my hands of this, but can 'tick the box' to say I've answered".

Waiting a week to reply also doesn't look very pro-active .........

 

How much does your firm get charged for each complaint to the Ombudsman (even if not found at fault??

 

Hi BazzaS

 

Thanks for your thoughts. I agree the delay in response isn't what we would hope for and we will endeavour to ensure this doesn't happen again in the future. In Rasdes first post they stated they have taken this up with the Ombudsman, which is why I did not offer to help further. If it had not gone to that stage already you are correct we would offer help and we will help wherever we can to put our customers in touch with the relevant team who can assist them and help resolve any problems or concerns they have.

 

I hope that helps put your mind at ease and thanks again for sharing your feedback.

 

Kind regards

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BazzaS

Thanks for your thoughts. I agree the delay in response isn't what we would hope for and we will endeavour to ensure this doesn't happen again in the future. In Rasdes first post they stated they have taken this up with the Ombudsman, which is why I did not offer to help further. If it had not gone to that stage already you are correct we would offer help and we will help wherever we can to put our customers in touch with the relevant team who can assist them and help resolve any problems or concerns they have.

 

I hope that helps put your mind at ease and thanks again for sharing your feedback.

 

Kind regards

 

Dave

 

 

Hi Rasdes,

 

If you have had a formal complaint raised and have now approached the ombudsman, then

 

I'd read the "If" as applying to both the formal complaint and the ombudsman .........

 

Thanks for the clarification.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd read the "If" as applying to both the formal complaint and the ombudsman .........

 

Thanks for the clarification.

 

If Aviava had been able to answer my questions and dealt with my case to my satisfaction I would have not needed to take my complaint to the Ombudsman, Surely it would have cost Aviva money to allow this to go to the Ombudsman and now after the Ombudsman has agreed with me and have told Aviva to compensate me, Aviva have now to pay twice.

What a shambles Aviva get you act together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Have spoken to Aviva again today who have made more excuses even though they have had instructions from Ombudsman to settle, their staff are rude and and unhelpful and Aviva should not be able to act this way, the should be part of a formal investigation, they always have excuses for their actions and do not have any respect and again reported them to the Ombudsman after the recent Ombudsman decision.

This is disgusting and Aviva should not be able to treat customers this way

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can enforce the Ombudsmans determination via the courts but I would go back to the Ombudsman and tell them that Aviva arent following the directions and you wish the determination enforced. Explain aboutthe obvious lack of interdepartmental cooperation or communication and see if they can chivvy them along before you have to resort to the courts. As for the level of compensation, it will never pay for your time as your time is free-you chose to go down this route and any other route wouldnt pay you for your time anyway. The compo is in lieu of an apology so dent expect one of them either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...