Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Central Ticketing? Anyone heard of them???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. I'm new to this forum so I hope I'm posting in the right place. If i'm not then I apologise and hope someone can point me in the right direction.

 

I parked on the Tesco car park in Bury on saturday and did my shopping. However, I had promised my daughter a McDonalds lunch. As the fast food place is on the same retail park as Tesco, I didn't see the harm on parking on Tesco, going to McDonalds and then going into Tesco to do my shopping. However, when I came back to my car with my shopping, I had a ticket on my windscreen. I had apparently "timed out". And so they have given me a £70 charge (according to the ticket).

 

I went into Tesco this morning to dispute the ticket with them. All they would do is photocopy the ticket for me to send off to Central Ticketing. They say it has nothing to do with them as the carpark belongs to Europcar.

 

I have also taken a photograph of the signage around the carpark that says a £70 "penalty" will be incurred for staying longer than 2 hours on that retail park. However, if you went into all the different shops there and had a McDonalds lunch, then went into Tesco to do a family shop, you could quite easily spend more than 2 hours there.

 

I really don't want to pay any money to Central Ticketing due to what I have read about them on the many forums on the internet. However, I really don't want to be bullied and harrassed. As a single parent, I don't want to be scared that someone may knock on my door demanding money that I just do not have.

 

The person employed to give people a ticket doesn't even wear a uniform that shows he is a parking attendant/inspector. And apparently they have taken a photograph of my car, although I don't know what they think they can prove with that, as obviously my car was there at the time they gave me a ticket and photographed it.

 

Any advice you can give me will be much appreciated.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 410
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

 

 

 

However, I really don't want to be bullied and harrassed. As a single parent, I don't want to be scared that someone may knock on my door demanding money that I just do not have.

 

 

 

Any advice you can give me will be much appreciated.

 

Thank you

 

 

 

Hi, don't worry nobody will come knocking on your door.

Advice is IGNORE. Do not contact Tesco, do not contact the parking company. Ignore all future correspondence from the parking company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't want to pay any money to Central Ticketing due to what I have read about them on the many forums on the internet. However, I really don't want to be bullied and harrassed. As a single parent, I don't want to be scared that someone may knock on my door demanding money that I just do not have.

 

As GWC has stated no-one will come anywhere near your house, I have lost count of the packets of biscuits I have had to throw away after the Debt collectors informed me that they were coming round and failed to show, it is all part of the bluff to frighten you into paying.

 

The person employed to give people a ticket doesn't even wear a uniform that shows he is a parking attendant/inspector.

 

They are too embarrassed

 

And apparently they have taken a photograph of my car, although I don't know what they think they can prove with that,

 

Absolutely nothing!

 

as obviously my car was there at the time they gave me a ticket and photographed it.

 

Any advice you can give me will be much appreciated.

 

as the others have stated ignore the ticket and the letters that will find their way to you in due course, any problems post back for support and guidance.

 

Thank you

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Result!! CCS Collect have refunded the £50 back into my account, 4 days after taking it!! Thanks for your support guys! Now I will get on with ignoring all future correspondence from Central Ticketing!!

 

Hello,

 

just to let you all know - not heard anything after I got a refund from CCS debt collectors in May. They said it would be passed back to Central Ticketing, but I havent heard anything so I guess they have finally given up! After this experience I will definately check my rights before I pay anything again!! Thanks for all help & dont worry if you have had a CT ticket, just ignore all, including debt collector letters - they wouldnt have refunded me if they werent in the wrong!!

Thanks again....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey all,

 

Just wanted to mention a development in my particular case with Central ticketing / CCS collect that I haven't seen on these forums before.

 

My partner and I have been through what appears to be the standard letters from CT and obviously we ignored them. The debt was eventually passed to CCS collect. We have been ignoring these as well.

 

Finally got the letter a few weeks back about the '72 hr notice of Bailiff visit', which we laughed at and again ignored, hoping we we're nearing the end of this saga.

 

However, this morning we got a letter from DWF LLP 'solicitors' who claim that that they are acting on behalf of their client CCS collect who are in turn acting on behalf of Central Ticketing.

 

Am I right in supposing that this letter is very much like the 'Graham White' letters discussed earlier?

 

Cheers in advance,

 

 

Carl

Link to post
Share on other sites

may be tempting to write to this lots and remind them of Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 Right of third party to enforce contractual term (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a person who is not a party to a contract (a “third party”) may in his own right enforce a term of the contract if— (a) the contract expressly provides that he may, or (b) subject to subsection (2), the term purports to confer a benefit on him. (2) Subsection (1)(b) does not apply if on a proper construction of the contract it appears that the parties did not intend the term to be enforceable by the third party. And ask them for proof of claim i.e the contract details. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally got the letter a few weeks back about the '72 hr notice of Bailiff visit', which we laughed at and again ignored, hoping we we're nearing the end of this saga.

 

Did it actually say, 'bailff visit'?

 

However, this morning we got a letter from DWF LLP 'solicitors' who claim that that they are acting on behalf of their client CCS collect who are in turn acting on behalf of Central Ticketing.

 

Am I right in supposing that this letter is very much like the 'Graham White' letters discussed earlier?

 

Same dance different song:D

 

Cheers in advance,

Carl

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For any St.Helens Tesco victims of Central ticketing-I too had one not too long ago.

I just got the second threatogram asking for 70 quid.

I am a little concerned at their letterhead which resembles very much something much more official-2 lions and a shield.

The lions are wearing crowns !!

I will be putting something together in the next few days.

You can rest assured this will be nipped in the bud SOONER rather than LATER;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi - please can i have some advice, i have recently recieved a parking charge from central ticketing for parking in a disabled bay - i inadvertantly thought it was a mother and child space - in a private car park belonging to a shopping outlet in cheshire, and have been told to pay £85.

i do not want to pay this as the carpark is normally completely free and i was only there for less than 10 minutes.

i have a friend who is a private bailiff and he says that as the wording on the back of the ticket says they "may" take court action it is unlikely that they will - his company wouldnt, but he cant be 100% sure.

i also need to know whether to respond to them now or wait until i get their first letter and what to say. also do i actually have a defence as it was for parking in a disabled bay?

 

any help gratefully appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it best to just ignore everything then, rather than to send even one letter stating that i wont be paying and why?

 

reading through all the posts on here it seems to vary from replying once to say that i wont pay and then ignoring everything else so that they cant say i didnt respond, to ignoring them completely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it best to just ignore everything then, rather than to send even one letter stating that i wont be paying and why?

 

Yes, it is best to ignore everything. Why? Because once you respond they know they have got through to someone you then move onto their, 'likely to pay list', which involves sending you lots more threats than if you had originally ignored them. Also ignoring them increases their costs.

 

reading through all the posts on here it seems to vary from replying once to say that i wont pay and then ignoring everything else so that they cant say i didnt respond,

 

So what if they do say you didn't respond? You are giving them far too much credibility, they are a mail fraud [problem] not a lawful authority, such as the Council or the Police.

 

to ignoring them completely?

 

Ignoring them completely is the best line to take.

 

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My wife got a £60 ticket for returning to the same car park on the same day, we appealed the case in letter but got a reply back saying that the appeal had been unsuccessful and that the £60 should be paid within 10 days.

Any thoughts on best way forward for this one ? ignore or continue the fight via letter, see how i didnt mention paying them.

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed - But thought I would write to them as well...

 

Quote:

Dear sirs,

 

Re: 0043XXX

 

Thankyou for your letter of 06th August, received with glee today.

 

I note your letter “will form part of our case against the driver of the vehicle” and wish you more luck in tracing him than I have had.

 

Please refrain from sending any further mail to my address, as further replies to your correspondence will be chargeable at the rate of £125 per page.

 

If you choose to send further letters, then this will indicate your acceptance of the charge, and agreement to pay it in full within 7 days, plus costs - should recovery action become necessary.

 

 

You may of course call me on the above numbers – Calls are charged at £1.50 per minute at all times.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Sent today lol - I only gave my premium 0906 number! And I deliberately worded the letter in the same vein as their parking signs...

 

 

Mike

 

did anything happen after you sent them this?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife got a £60 ticket for returning to the same car park on the same day, we appealed the case in letter but got a reply back saying that the appeal had been unsuccessful and that the £60 should be paid within 10 days.

Any thoughts on best way forward for this one ? ignore or continue the fight via letter, see how i didnt mention paying them.

 

:confused:

 

 

Ignore. You shouldn't have bothered appealing in the first place as it was destined to fail!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having had the letter before Court action myself-they can have one of mine.

 

 

 

NOTICE UNDER CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES***

 

reference

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

This is in acknowledgement of your letters dated xxxxxx and also of xxxxxx,the contents of which have been duly noted.

Further to you stressing that County Court proceedings will be actioned by yourselves, should I fail to make payment in relation to alleged parking tickets for which I was responsible,I draw your attention to The Civil procedure rules protocols.(Pre action directions)

I put forward that you now have a requirement to provide me with;

 

 

1) A copy of the ticket(s) that was allegedly issued to the vehicle,including photographic evidence.

 

2) A copy of any documents that have given rise for you to pursue me personally,as being the driver of the vehicle on the

date and time of any alleged offence,which includes information obtained from third parties.

3).A copy of the terms and conditions,which you seek to rely on,in assuming I have a liability to pay any such charges.

 

4).A breakdown of all charges which form the make up of any fees/charges that you allege are due,which can clearly show

that they are in proportion to the cost of enforcing or applying any such breach or alleged breach of parking terms.

 

5)Details of communications,both written,electronically.or by telephone,in relation to the recovery of any alleged charges

which has required the processing or sharing of my personal data,including third party individuals,organisations,and companies.

6) A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection act.

 

I make this request to ensure that each party has equal footings which can allow action to proceed speedily fairly and without undue costs or waste of courts time,as defined within Pre-action Practice Directions -Protocols 4.6 of the Civil Procedures Rules.

I will give you 14 days to respond with the above,failure to comply will result in a complaint being made to the Court. in the event of any summons,and furthermore, my local Trading Standards office.My complaints will include but not be limited to; breaches as a result of initiating a Country Court claim where failing to provide or produce documents make litigation improper..

Specifically this relates to one or any number of the following;

 

* demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* add any further interest or charges to the account.

* pass/sell the account or outstanding balance to any third party.

* register any information in respect of the account with any of the credit reference agencies.

 

Furthermore,I reserve my right to make a copy of this letter available for inspection to the Court and Financial/Consumer regulators should you fail to comply with this request,upon County Court action being initiated.

I await your response,and should you need further clarification on any of the above points,then I suggest that you direct them to your legal department.

 

Your attention is drawn to Office of Fair Trading debt collection final guidance 2003,you should read this also.

 

I further remind you,that at no stage have I given you or your agents,any permission to process,share,or control my personal data,and trust that you have familiarised yourselves with requirements under the data protection act 1980

I will be considering issuing a section 10 notice,in order to exercise my rights,but will first allow you opportunity to either

comply with the requests outlined herein,or else give an undertaking in writing that you will cease from further demands upon me in relation to the alleged sums due

 

I trust this clarifies my position

 

xxxxxxx

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin excellent letter, woul love to end it with

 

shove it up.....

 

So just read all these threads and one said leave frozen shopping in trolley

cos time running out lol!!!

 

Can you get done for that or is it really complicated?

 

Maybe we should have a competition on here on how many tickets we can collect!

 

I look forward to the letters which I shred and compress into blocks and use as BBQ bricks, they burn for hours!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

Well they will now have to either put up,or shut up.

Ball is in their court-but clock is ticking.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a big thank you to all that leave post giving advice to all on how to treat these [problematic].i got a ticket in april and after reading all comments went with choice to ignore.after recieving letter after letter it seems that they have given up (TOUCH WOOD).last letter dated early july,so if you are new to this dont give in and pay,

IGNORE IGNORE IGNORE,they will go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
a big thank you to all that leave post giving advice to all on how to treat these [problematic].i got a ticket in april and after reading all comments went with choice to ignore.after recieving letter after letter it seems that they have given up (TOUCH WOOD).last letter dated early july,so if you are new to this dont give in and pay,

IGNORE IGNORE IGNORE,they will go away.

 

 

i concur, thanks to all posters on here, after my original ticket in may 09, i found this site while looking for central ticketing to actually pay them:eek: anyway following the advice on here after numerous threatening letters i had my last one in july 09 giving me 7 days to pay or we where going to court, ignored it, as i have done with all the rest and i have heard nothing since.

once again thank you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a parking ticket in tesco's from this central ticketing company.

i am not the registered keeper anyway, so what do i do? do i ignore it and let the registered keeper wait for a letter and then get them to reply with your template?

it was for parking in a disabled bay. there were no signs saying parking enforcement was in operation, and fines were payable if it wasn't adhered to etc.

also, once i opened the fine, i have noticed the sheet inside wasn't the correct way. so when it has been written out, the carbon has imprinted it onto the actual back of the ticket, which is UNREADABLE as its written amongst all the small print about payment options, appeals etc.

so the front has no reference, make model date, time, reason for fine etc.

what do i do??

Link to post
Share on other sites

simple rules on these

 

1) IGNORE

 

2) IGNORE

 

3) GOTO 1

 

 

ITS NOTHING MORE THAN A [problem] INVOICE

 

you will get lots of letters from the threat monkeys,

 

1st one all sort of claims you must do this etc etc , and if not they MAY do this and that

 

2nd a debt collector ( next desk along ) same old twadle

 

3rd ( and maybe a few for good luck ) from the 3rd dest claiming their solicitors and your in big trouble because they MAY/MIGHT take you to Court,

 

in the end they move onto the next sucker as they see it

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...