Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Broadband Provider Policy on Peer 2 Peer?


Guest weegirl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6013 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest weegirl

I heard yesterday from a mobile sales rep that his Tiscali connection has slowed way down when he uses his file sharing program. The shop manager said that a lot of providers are going down the route of trying to block peer 2 peer file sharing.

 

Is this true? Or was he just talking nonsense (he was trying his hardest to sell my friend a talk talk package with her new phone contract - which she was having none of).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi it's topcatdc

my conection goes realy slow when i use a p2p (Ares) i have tried others such as limewire but have had loads of problems with them

i might ask Virgin media if there are any issues with these

tc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most ISPs are trying to cut down on this kind of illegal downloading - I wouldn't mention it to Virgin if I was you!

 

I agree that most p2p is illegal downloading but not all of it is, some of us use it for work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Pat Mustard

Maybe I'm missing something here, but surely you'd expect your connection (I guess you mean the speed of other things, not the p2p app itself) to slow down when using p2p because they tend to be quite bandwidth intensive

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you need to understand about P2P, is that generally your connection speed to them is not based on your download speed.

 

1.

 

You might be on an 8 meg connection. Which is essence means you should dl @ around 800k per second. But your upload speed is probably 1/10th of that.

 

So whoever you are downloading from might be on a 2 meg conection which means he can only upload to your computer @ 20k per second.

 

2.

 

I have never heard on isp providers operating a system where they change your speed in relation to what piece of software you are using.

 

You could be access archived files for work etc.

 

3.

 

Your contention ratio will also affect your dl speed.

 

Contention ratio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

as will the time of day you dl stuff.

 

4. Test out the speed of your connection. Various online websites will do it for you.

 

Then test dl from a major site like microsoft, as they will give users high bw.

 

Hope this helps.

 

5. Dont forget most isps allow for fair usage policy which is extremely vague.

 

 

PS. Remember dl music films etc is illegal.

My respect to people who post regularly and help people out on here. Without your help alot of wrongs would have been committed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Pat Mustard

You might be on an 8 meg connection. Which is essence means you should dl @ around 800k per second.

 

Actually, it should be nearer 1000Kbs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it should be nearer 1000Kbs

 

hence my should be around that

 

if we are going that way then 1 meg = transfer rate of 1280 kbit/s downstream and 320 kbit/s upstream

 

so infact the dl rate is 10240 kbit/s so you are wrong

My respect to people who post regularly and help people out on here. Without your help alot of wrongs would have been committed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Pat Mustard

if we are going that way then 1 meg = transfer rate of 1280 kbit/s downstream and 320 kbit/s upstream

 

No it doesn't, 1 Mb is 1 million bits. And 1 Mb download rate doesn't say anything about what the bandwidth in the opposite direction is

 

so infact the dl rate is 10240 kbit/s so you are wrong

 

No

Link to post
Share on other sites

Average speeds will vary dependent upon: user hardware, data line condition,

ISP hardware, Internet traffic, interconnecting server loads, and target server load.

Average download times are usually longer due to general server loads and traffic.

 

Theoretical max only exists when all variables and conditions are aligned. Very few people, even with the best of hardware and line conditions, rarely achieve this max.

My respect to people who post regularly and help people out on here. Without your help alot of wrongs would have been committed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

There is technology which is increasingly being used by providers to control downloads. "Packet Shaping" (google it - you'll find LOADS). Essentially it gives providers the ability to detect the type of traffic on your particular connection and - if they so desire - throttle your speeds when you use things like P2P.

 

It seems to be becoming quite a popular choice for ISPs and can essentially kill your "broad"band connection when it is activated.

 

There's a lot of controversy around it, especially as services such as 4OD (Channel 4 On Demand) and the still useless BBC equivalent use (bad implementations of) P2P under the hood.

 

Anecdotally, the only provider I've been told about (by friends - I'm not in the industry!) who definitely does NOT use it is certain services by Demon (that's my recollection - a few months old though). Anyway, I have seen some suspicious behaviour on my pipex connection.

 

Many of the P2P clients have FAQs on how to try to mitigate the effect of this, from using alternative ports to forcing encryption on ALL P2P packets - this seems to work for me as many other people are doing the same!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been using Virgin for Torrent file downloads without any issue. I think one of the main problems that you may be having is that Tiscalli use ADSL which is via a phone line. The only way you will get the true "UP TO *Meg" speed is to live in the phone exchange. The further you are from the exchange the more the signal degrades....

FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR FRIENDS IN THE NSA USING THE PRISM SYSTEM. HELLO FROM THE UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes T Star, but hence the reason why the further from the exchange, the lower the advertised speed....

 

Worth noting I am on Tesco broadband, no P2P restrictions at all.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If we're talking Tiscali - yes, they are throttling p2p. And p2p doesn't need to be illegal! Many linux distros (free of charge, full legal) are ready to download from p2p and this is not a crime. Even NASA had some software fro public for free relesed on p2p for faster spread. So p2p doesn't need to be illegal.

Back to Tiscali - if you will try to download something in their peak hours you will get FUP-ed. The 3-rd FUP means your connection in peak time is unusable. Internet messangers won't work, IRC won't work, online gaming won't work. You will have your broadband just for extremely slow browsing. But - grat news! When you get your 3-rd FUP warning, you can get away from all of this, even if your contract isn't at end. You can request a MAC code without any charge, and go to other provider, who can be not so strict in their FUP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had direct experience of Virgin throttling P2P, so it does happen. A student of mine's husband is using P2P on his computer, and after he's been uploading/downloading for more than a few minutes the "down" speed automatically drops to 15kBps.

 

He is downloading copyrighted material, but so what? It's not the job of businesses to enforce the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I belive it DOES fall under the ISPs responsibility as their failure to do anything about it could lead rise to them being prosecuted.

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I belive it DOES fall under the ISPs responsibility as their failure to do anything about it could lead rise to them being prosecuted.

 

The argument they use is that they are only 'conduits' and at present there is no onus on an ISP to enforce usage in such a way.

 

Bear in mind that P2P traffic does not automatically equate to copywrite infringement, it has varied legitimate uses also. VM shape the traffic of those who are using the service in such a way that may degrade the level of service to other users, whether this be via P2P or HTTP, FTP, NNTP etc etc..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, blaming an ISP for the actions of a customer would be like blaming peugeot for drink drivers.

 

Basicly what providers are doing is slowing conections if you exceed a certain ammount of downloads, and with many online products/activities now being very data-intensive, many people are finding thier service is being slowed through normal useage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quite simply, the isp's block or throttle back connections through the ports used by your p2p software. Encryption can help to reduce the effect, but in many cases taking time to set up your p2p software properly can improve your connection speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use AOL. Not the software, just the connection. I have four PCs networked and sharing the connection via a router.

I very rarely have any problems.

What is not generally realised is that the rate that you are uploading will affect the download rate.

 

Yes, I scoffed at that idea, as well, but we have proved it, by throttling the upload rate on Shareaza.

 

So many variables!

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...