Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Log Book Loans took my car....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Applecart I agree with your intentions. However & I'm afraid it's a big 'however' I fundamentally disagree with the remark that some may not warrant such protection........... they do. There is no difference between a won't payer & a can't payer being bullied unlawfully & threatened by these cretins.

 

The moment it's decided, by you, me or anyone, there's a law for one but not the other will the day that anarchy will start to take hold

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Jon

 

Totally agree...the law is there to protect us all - but I was speaking purely from the point of view that it must be accepted that there are those in society who truly have no intention of repaying loans - and it is also fair in a debate to consider both sides of a story ... i.e the experience of the lender facing a situation where he cannot secure any return on his investment.....there will be instances where the debtor has no reason for obsconding on his duty to repay a loan.....

 

I hope this explains my point more clearly - notwithstanding that the law is there to protect us all - but is not to be taken for granted - there are normally always another parties interests to be taken into account.

 

: )

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also many are concerned about the Bill of Sales' being registered 'out of time' the argument here is - why did it take lbl rep so long to get to a solicitor to swear the document? - he would have to prove that every solicitor of oaths across the land was closed from the date the Agreement was entered into until it was registered (date stamp) at the HIgh Court of Justice..: )

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also many are concerned about the Bill of Sales' being registered 'out of time' the argument here is - why did it take lbl rep so long to get to a solicitor to swear the document? - he would have to prove that every solicitor of oaths across the land was closed from the date the Agreement was entered into until it was registered (date stamp) at the HIgh Court of Justice..: )

 

I think we ALL know the answer to that one......don't we;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It occurs to me to ask why would the salesman go all the way to Wimbledon to swear an affidavit when they lived & conducted business in say Newcastle or indeed anywhere else other than Wimbledon:confused:

 

Knowing Wimbledon as I do I doubt there are many clients of LBL there:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jon

 

Could it be that their reputation is beginning to proceed them amongst most commissioners of oath?

 

You imagine....., you are a company involved in the business of credit - and you are minded that your licence is being considered for 'revocation' and you want a 'reputable' solicitor to risk his/her reputation for a Free service? or for a Fee that would never cover the cost of a hard earned reputation - I wouldn't, would you?

 

Must be something wrong, hey?

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jon

 

Really?... they can run, but they can't hide..... A quick email to the Law Society would help ensure that wherever he goes - he will be more than well received, i'm sure.

 

Imagine the day when all who have agreements with them decide to protest and not one of them pays them for an entire month....or two.or three or more???

 

or

 

No solicitor in the land will stake their reputation by swearing an oath for a LBL Agreement....?

 

Would that be yet another company hit by the people crunch - whoops sorry..... I meant credit crunch?

 

Just a thought?

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi i bought a van 5 months ago. i now hold the v5 documents ect. came home on wednesday to find the van gone. there was a note through the door saying it has been reposesed. i called them up to find out whats going apprently the previous owner had a log book loan out on it and has dissaperd. what advice can anyone give me?

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are in the same postition as us, you will also find you have no legal right to the car. We can give you phone number for our contact at the daily mirror who ran our story in march. Read the thread are you a third party victim by wearecarless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hope anyone can help, took a loan out with LBL, nearly finished the loan , they have put extra charges on me for late payments £12 for a phone call £12 for a letter which i think is over the top, i have recently become unemployed i have tried explaining this to them but they still want me paying £30 a week , is there anything i can do with these charges because they are building up to £600, i origanally borrowed £1200 and i payed a total back of £2500 thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...

Hi

I had my car taken by LBL in April..I had parked my car where i thought it was safe at work, when i came back my car was gone. So after checking the spot where i had parked it and the notices around it, i decided to go to the nearest police station to report its theft. After a short while the officer informed me that LBL had got my car and had left a number to call.

I had taken advice and had lawyers on the case, but the thing is once LBL have your car in most cases there is not much you can do. From what i understand there was supposed to be a test case going on, but it keeps getting put back...quite frankly it will be a long drawn out contest..while thousaunds of people are losing their cars...This company shoud have never been allowed to get away with this kind of dealing, and the law should be changed!!!:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had paid quite a lot of money...and realised it would have been impossible to get it back as they were asking for around £8000, they have since snet me a letter saying they sold it and i owed them £3500..lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All new to site, but wth current dealings with LBL and being connected with finance and its law, i found the following which may be relevant:

 

Log Book Loans

 

 

Investigation: Log Book Loans Contract identifier: UTCCRContract-1 Country of complaint: United Kingdom Country of origin: United Kingdom Trading sector group: Wandsworth Trading Standards Department Trading Sector: xxxxxxx Financial//Mortgages and secured credit --Financial//Mortgages and secured credit Action taken by: OFT Local Authority: Wandsworth Trading Standards Department Legislation used: Community Infringements Specified UK Laws//Unfair Contract Terms 1999 Regulation considered: Unfair Contract Term Notes: Notes

 

Original term Application of regulations/Enforcer view How changed New term Pre Contract Information, Charges: "If you are late in paying an instalment, then...you will pay us, if we so require, interest from when it was due until when it is paid at the rate of the APR"1(e) Penalty clause (financial) :

1(e) The term set the interest rate for late payments at the APR, so that it included not only the contractual interest rate but also a further amount in respect of the commitment fee. This was a potentially unfair penalty, particularly since Section 93 of the Consumer Credit Act provides that interest payable in default cannot be higher than the contractual interest rate.

Revised so that interest for late payments will be charged at the contractual rate.Pre Contract Information, ChargesBill of Sale, Term 2Unfair Contract Term :

Reg 5 Term required consumer to keep the vehicle insured for a specified amount. OFT considered that this would place an unreasonable obligation on the Buyer if the specified amount was excessive or even impossible to achieve.

Reference to amount of insurance cover deleted from term.Term 2Bill of Sale, Term 7Unfair Contract Term :

Reg 5 Term provided that if the Borrower defaulted on payments or breached his obligations, the Lender, its servants or agents could seize and take possession of the vehicle from any premises. OFT was concerned by the wide right of entry provided by this term, whereby the lender could trespass onto the land of third parties in order to seize the vehicle.

Revised so that where the vehicle is not at the Borrower's property or a public place, the Lender will use reasonable and proportionate measures to seize and take possession of it.Term 7Bill of Sale, Term 8Unfair Contract Term :

Reg 5 Term provided that if the Lender was entitled to seize the vehicle, the Lender or his agents could enter and remain on any premises where the vehicle happened to be and break open doors and windows in order to seize the vehicle. OFT was concerned by the wide right of entry provided by this term, whereby the lender could trespass and damage the property of third parties in order to seize the vehicle. Term provided that where the vehicle had been seized, the Lender could sell the vehicle after 5 days. OFT was concerned that the term did not provide advance warning to the Borrower before the vehicle was sold, in order that he may have the opportunity to rectify matters before the sale takes place.

Revised so that where the vehicle is at any property not owned by the Borrower, the Lender will use reasonable and proportionate measures to seize and take possession of it. Revised to include reference to the fact that a Default Notice is sent to the Borrower before the vehicle is seized, giving him a set period of time to remedy the breachTerm 8Bill of Sale, Term 101(e) Penalty clause (financial) :

1(e) Term provided that the costs, charges, payments and expenses that the Lender incurred in selling the car would be deducted from the sale proceeds.

Revised so that only reasonable costs, charges, payments and expenses would be deducted.Term 10

Outcome reached: Undertaking obtained with no admission Date effective: 23 February 2006 Received from: Outcome text:

Other Information

 

OFT urged the company to ensure that all its franchisees quote the APR accurately in their Pre Contract Information and Consumer Credit Agreements.

 

Direct from oft.......

 

Also before any person can immobilise or remove your car they do now have to be SIA registered failure could result in the person visiting your home being prosecuted.

 

Don't know if this helps anyone else but i hope it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a logbook loan and have fell behind :evil: and when i told them i would be willing to pay my weekly payments again they told me i would have to phone another company so i did and they said i would have to pay over 1300 pounds or the car would be lifted clearly i dont have 1300 but car is still in my name so i was thinking if i put private plate on my car could they still uplift it? can any 1 help????:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

pethead, if you put a private plate on your car you would be at risk of loosing that also, before you do you must inform any party that has a financial interest in your car that should any problem occurs and the vehicle for whatever reason is removed, then the private plate remains the property of yourself and will be returned to you, currently if your car is repo'd with a private plate it can be sold with the car. After looking into the contracts of log book loans, you must apply to the court in london to check if they have registered the bill of sale that you would have signed, if it isnt registered then hp finance rules apply where if you have paid atleast a third of your agreement they need a court order to repo, just a note tho ANY PERSON WISHING TO REPOSSES OR IMMOBILISE A VEHICLE MUST BE SIA REGISTERED. (not all bailiffs or agents are, so check if the repo team turn up, if not call the police) if you want more info let me have your email address. regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

my email address is edited the idea was if the repo man comes if i changed reg and never told logbook the repo man would not know my car was the 1 they want as they looking for the reg they have on record or i considerd selling car far from here as i have v5 logbook and cant find any hpi on my car. all help will be greatfully accepted thanks.

ps who do i need to contact in london do u have address and phone number?

Edited by ScarletPimpernel
Remove personal detail
Link to post
Share on other sites

13 Chattels not to be removed or sold

All personal chattels seized or of which possession is taken . . . . . . F1, under or by virtue of any bill of sale (whether registered before or after the commencement of this Act), shall remain on the premises where they were so seized or so taken possession of, and shall not be removed or sold until after the expiration of five clear days from the day they were so seized or so taken possession of.

Annotations:

 

Amendments (Textual)

 

F1Words repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1898 (c. 22)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Your Quote About The Sia Is Wrong. Ive Been In The Industry For Over 10 Years Done My Sia Course. Definately By Law The Person Who Is Putting The Clamp On The Vehicle Must Be Licenced. Unless Your Employed For Example By Log Book Direct Then and Clamper Must Have The Security Industy Authority Badge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Checked sia site, only applies for monetary reward, ie payment to remove clamp, LBL recovery people are not doing that they are waiting for recovery truck to arrive.. They are not charging for release of the clamp they are only collecting the debt (or taking the car)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Folks

 

In regards to my complaint against Logbook Loans i have had several discussions and also studying to be a solicitor i came across baliffs and also made up phone calls and also people who did not want to listen so i went to the Cab who were ok but told me what i knew already and in the end if went to the Financial Obudsman who where very helpful they have a lot on at the moment but kept me informed on the progress of my call. I have now come to an amicable solution with the Obudsman and also Logbook and now awaiting my logbook. Please note @ - Keep a spreadsheet of all payments and conversations and also the Bill Of Sale and contact the Financial Obudsman asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Everyone, pls get yourself a copy of " THE BILL OF SALE ACT 1882" I have just found out that my bill of sale is invalid, meaning i still have a debt but they have no right to take my car. There are many things that can make the bill of sale invalid. check that they have registered it within 7 days at The High Court, The Strand. the bill of sale should be stamped, ask log book loans for a copy of this. Also when you signed the bill of sale was there a third party present who witnessed it and signed it as a witness? If only you signed it and the guy that gave you the loan it is invalid. The Bill Of Sale Act states that a bill of sale will be void if it fails to include any of the following information: one of them is ;Attestation by a witness not party to the bill.meaning witnessed by a third party who has nothing to do with LogBook Loans. call Trading Standards or citizens Advice and write to them outlining that this is not valid. If thay try to take your car you can get them done for theft....:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...