Jump to content

Lopeylou

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Lopeylou

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yes found out a few hours before that it was adjourned, so that has saved some stress. Will have to wait and see what happens next. Thanks for the help with this matter, made it all feel a lot more manageable.
  2. Okay thanks for that. so I don't need to do anything else and I can make the SB defence argument in court, but it might not be accepted because of that. if they do have any evidence that there is a contract and the statue barred defence isn't accepted I'll just have to accept that, and the debt? Thanks
  3. I agreed to adjourn, and they sent off the document to the court and cc'd me in. However I rang the court to check it had all been processed okay and was told that as a fee had not been provided the consent order would not be applied and the hearing is still tomorrow! Not sure what to make of that. As it is now going ahead can I use the statue barred defence? They only thing I have done for this is email the SB defence shown earlier in the thread to them and the court. Also if I can use it does that rely on me continuing to deny that I am in breach of
  4. Well that is what I was thinking, so ill agree to adjourn. Sorry must have misunderstood about the defence. Does that mean I need to do it again this time with a witness statement?
  5. I've just checked my email after sending off the SB defence yesterday and after they had received the documents I wished to refer to in court. They are saying that in light of this they wish to apply for a deferment of the case, and want me to sign a consent order asking for the case to be adjourned for at least 35 days. Suggesting that during this time we work together to resolve the situation without legal recourse. That sounds like a positive to me as it suggests to me that they are not confident in getting the result they want. Personally I would rather avoid havi
  6. Sorry if I a bit slow here. Does this mean that they filed the N244, and therefore I just need to place the above with the necessary information in an email? I don't need to fill out the N244 form as well? Thanks
  7. Hello Appreciate any help with this. I have previously had dealings with Dryden/Fairfax solicitors. Apparently Erudio bought some student loan debt of mine from the SLC. I was unaware of this as they consistently sent all correspondence to a previous address. in June 2017 I noticed some beneficiary trace searches on my credit report against an old address. Worried in case it was anything serious I called at my old address to see if I had any mail there relating to it and discovered two county court claims lodged at Northampton from about 3
×
×
  • Create New...