Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nothing will happen in regard to this one shoplifting event, other than Sainsburys won't let you shop in this store again.   But, if you continued to shoplift, then the consequences are more serious. Local to me, there  is a town where about 13 people have been banned from shopping in many of the shops. They are subject to some form of order, where if they set foot in any of the stores, they will be subject to arrest by Police.  
    • Agree with DX, Sadly, from the pics, it looks like you're bang to rights😪 The rules are very explicit. Before entering the box, you must ensure that you are able to completely exit. It looks like the car in front may have moved a couple of feet and tempted you to set off, but when you did that, there still wasn't enough room to completely exit the box. By all means ask to see the video evidence, but saying you had to stop because the vehicle in front stopped, isn't a valid defence.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Evri driver claims one of the dogs has bitten him


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I was wondering if anyone could advise.

My mum has had a letter through the door from a solicitors claiming ‘dog bite and scratches’ and claiming compensation for an attack on an evri driver by a dog.

Looking at the photo of the date of delivery my dog a 1year old 5lb chihuahua is seen in the delivery picture with my dads hand grabbing the parcel. We aren’t aware of any attack or bites until my mum got a letter. 


My mum remembers on the day she had the dogs in the back garden, If there is someone at the door the dogs are locked away, my dad opened the door and my dog must have got loose. My dad said it stepped out and straight in when he called him and he didn’t see any attack. My dog has no previous history of this and is very tiny.

 
The day the letter was received 1 week and 6 days from the incident, I saw the same driver delivering on my street and have a video. He is in shorts and I could see no damage to his legs as stated and he was still working. 


also previously there was an instance involving him and my dog but at my address which is a street away. My dog has his bed on the window ledge and enjoys to look out, the same delivery man came to my house to deliver but before he knocked on he was tapping on the window to my dog which I found strange.

can anyone advise.

They have asked me to contact my insurance company but I don’t even know if the said attack actually happened and the extent, if any, of the damages.

I feel like this evri driver is trying to scam me to get compensation.

Tia

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this from evri themselves or a personal claim raised by the driver?

who are the solicitors and who is their stated client?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Irrespective of the driver's motives and whether you think he is right you must send this letter to your insurers immediately and without replying to it yourself. 

It is a formal letter of claim from a solicitor alleging that your dog on your premises caused personal injury to the driver and wanting financial compensation from you. Your insurance policy will have a condition requiring you to send it straight to insurers and they will deal with the solicitor direct. If you don't do this your insurers could refuse to deal with the claim if the driver later took you to court.

If insurers decide the driver has a case then your insurers will pay it. There is not  normally any excess on cover for third party personal injury claims so insurers would pay from the first £.

Your insurers will ask you for a written statement of what you know so you will have the chance to tell them everything you have told us here.

 

EDIT I'm not sure whether this claim is against you or your mother. If it's against your mother then she must send it to her insurers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Halfwaythere  -  just to clarify, when Ethel Street refers to "your insurers" I think she means whoever insures your house and its contents (assuming you have such cover).

If you have separate contents and buildings cover it will be whichever one provides cover for occupier's liability (or it might be called something like your legal liability for injury to third parties arising from your ownership or occupation of the property).  If you do have separate cover for contents and buildings it will probably be your buildings policy.

Of course it might be confused somewhat by it being your dog but your parents' house.  Who is the letter addressed to?

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s addressed to my mums address where it allegedly happened but it’s my dog.

I have home and pet Insurance and im sure they will pay out but my point is I think it’s a false claim and on my pet insurance that goes against my dog in the future

Link to post
Share on other sites

But who is it addressed to?  Or is it just The Occupier?

Insurers are not in the habit of paying out on false claims.  If the driver can't prove on the balance of probabilties that your dog bit him, I doubt they would pay out.

If you don't want to involve insurance you'll have the hassle of dealing with the claim yourself.

(If this happened at your parents' house I don't know if your own home or pet insurance would cover it.  Does your pet insurance cover biting third parties?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Passing the letter to insurers to deal with is definitely not admitting liability. It's simply that your insurers deal with third party claims on your behalf. 

I'm not surprised the solicitor is acting for the driver personally as I believe all Evri delivery drivers are self-employed.

To clarify the point Manxman raises about which insurer, I mean the household/home insurer of the occupier of the house where the driver was bitten. I assume the occupier is your mother/parents.  If she/they has separate buildings and contents policies it is the insurers of the contents (not the buildings insurer) because the claim is being made against the occupier, it's an 'occupiers liability' claim. 

Whether there is any complication later because it is your dog not theirs we can't say at this stage. But don't overcomplicate it. Right now the claim hasn't been made against the dog's owner, it's been sent to the occupier of the premises where the incident occurred. Unsurprisingly it won't be addressed to them by name as the driver probably doesn't know their name. But there's little point in ignoring it on that technicality as the solicitor would soon be able to find out who occupies the premises by using enquiry agents if you do nothing. And the cost of that gets added to the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just addressed to ‘dir sirs’ and my mums address. I would have to check that with insurance.

what I found strange to in the letter it gives the drivers address date of birth and national insurance number, I thought that would be against gdpr rules 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Halfwaythere said:

what I found strange to in the letter it gives the drivers address date of birth and national insurance number, I thought that would be against gdpr rules 

 

Why? The information has been given (presumably) with the driver's consent. You can disclose any personal information you like about yourself.

Anyway there's a reason why the information is given, which is that if at a later date your insurers do make a compensation payment the NHS can make a recovery from the insurer of their treatment costs if the driver received hospital treatment. The DoB/NINO allows the injured person to be correctly identified.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a company of nwnf scammers?? And just a threat-o-gram what is their name?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I believe they are legit solicitors but I don’t know them it’s Sebastian Rowe in Manchester.

I don’t believe the driver is being fully truthful that he needs compensation for ‘rehabilitation’ for anything my dog could have done within those seconds at his size and surely he would have said at the time or gone owe, not ‘ok thanks bye’ 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pass it to your mother's/parents insurers asap. It doesn't matter what you believe, it may invalidate your mother's/parents' insurance if you try to deal with it yourself.

Insurance companies are very well aware that third parties exaggerate, invent, and tell outright lies to try and get money from insurers. They deal with third party solicitors trying it on every day. They are well used to investigating the allegations and rejecting them if they can't be substantiated.

All the reasons you think the driver isn't being truthful you can put in your/your mother's statement to insurers so that their lawyers can take them into account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you but I don’t want it to affect my mums insurance, I would like if possible to do through my own pet insurance.

It’s really horrible people can do this and the accused mental health should be considered when things like this, receiving a letter saying their is a claim against you is really distressing I’ve had palpitations for 2 days 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't. The third party has issued a demand for compensation to your mother as occupier of the premises where the alleged incident occurred. Your mother can't transfer the claim to you.  The most likely result of you contacting the solicitor and saying 'it was my dog' would be that you would be added to the claim as a co-defendant, not that your mother would be deleted from it.

Were you there when the alleged incident occurred?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As previously advised, it is most important you let the insurance company sort this out, and not you personally.

All we have is an allegation at the moment. Nothing more to substantiate your dog caused the injury,

In 2015, they changed the law because of the epidemic of attacks on postal workers by dogs.

The law now states owners have to keep "Reasonable control" of their dogs, even on a private residential address. The dog injured an individual on the property will be enough of a lack of reasonable control.

But proving it was your dog that caused the injury is another matter.

Best let the professionals deal with this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is why you let the insurance company sort it.

 

The insurance company would expect pictures on his phone with metadata for a start that will put him at the house date and time, what medical treatment received, etc/

Yo can also tell the age of the injury in a picture as well, being recent or a few days old. The insurance company will demand this before substantiating any claim from the claimant.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

they are nwnf scammers..

Pricing 

No Win No Fee

Most of our services are dealt on a No Win No Fee basis which means that you only pay a fee if we are succesful.  

The areas we offer this services apply to:

  • Personal Injury
  • Industrial Disease
  • Housing Disrepair

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop worrying about this.

You are falling victim to a scam where they send threatening letters hoping that you will cave in to fear and pay up.

The more questions you ask or doubts you entertain, the more the fear builds up, increasing the chance you will indeed cave in and pay up a "settlement fee". Let the dodgy driver worry about coming up his evidence, that you already know he doesn't have.

As 4 people have already told you, let your mum's insurance deal with the scammers. That's what you pay them for.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

My worry here is that you're going to make posts on various help/advice sites until someone somewhere tells you that you should either; a) deal with it yourself, or b) ignore it all, because I get the distinct impression from reading this thread that you don't want to accept the advice you've been given. I hope I'm wrong, sincerely.

The fact of the matter is, as has been said many times, you will make this situation considerably worse if you don't pass this on, or have your parents pass this on, to their insurer. I understand the desire to protect them and any associated anxiety they might be feeling, but that's a short-sighted view.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, theberengersniper said:

My worry here is that you're going to make posts on various help/advice sites until someone somewhere tells you that you should either; a) deal with it yourself, or b) ignore it all, because I get the distinct impression from reading this thread that you don't want to accept the advice you've been given. I hope I'm wrong, sincerely.

The fact of the matter is, as has been said many times, you will make this situation considerably worse if you don't pass this on, or have your parents pass this on, to their insurer. I understand the desire to protect them and any associated anxiety they might be feeling, but that's a short-sighted view.

Not at all I’ve used this forum before and found it very useful and from that I have learned I need to have all my facts right before I jump to the instruction of a letter from an outsider when I have no knowledge in the matter 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...