Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking Eye PCN for shopping over 1 hr - Lidl carpark Worthing ***Cancelled by Lidl***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you both for your very good input.

 

Before your replies, I had already gone back to customer service invoking quite a few of the points you both made: loyal customers, proof of many shopping trips, the fact that had I known this would be the result I would take my custom elsewhere. 
 
Here is their response much the same as the last one - different assistant name. 
 

Re: Parking Charge Notice

Thank you for getting in touch.

I appreciate this is an upsetting matter and I am sorry that you were unhappy with our previous

response.

 

We are unable to make an appeal on your behalf. This is because all appeals need to be placed in

writing directly by the appellant. Doing so allows you to retain your right to formally appeal any

decisions made by the car park management company.

 

A reminder that details of the appeals procedure can be found on the reverse of the Parking Charge

Notice you received.

 

Thank you again for contacting us.

Yours sincerely,

 

For and on behalf of Lid Great Britain Limited

Yvonne Ward

Customer Service

For more information on how we process your personal data visit www.lidl.co.uk/privacynotice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is that they wouldn't be "appealing" on your behalf.

There is likely to be a clause in their contract with the fleecers, allowing them to cancel a pcn.

 

The minions you're dealing with probably have no idea about the contract, or they simply just couldn't care less.

Just swatting you away like a fly, hoping you don't come back.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have gone back with yet another reply -making some of your points in regards to PE being a lost cause to appeal against. 
 

Maybe if I reply to every single one of their polite refusal I can break them down somehow. We’ll see

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do I!

 

The problem is that someone in senior management has decided at some point that the policy is not to cancel tickets, so the staff have been given a script to read from.

 

Also, I wouldn't blast them in the review.  There are often replies to critical reviews saying they will do their best to put things right.  I'd write a polite review criticising the parking policy and see what happens.  Has to be worth a try.

 

If you get nowhere you can always edit the review and blast then later!

 

Even critical reviews are complimentary about the staff.  If the place is near to you, go back and ask to speak to the manager.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, here we are: the latest response in the NoCAnDo series from Lidl customer dis-service. This time I’ve been graced with a response from a Management Team member 

Re: Parking Charge Notice

Thank you for your recent email. I am writing to you as a member of the Customer Service Management Team. 

I appreciate this is a very upsetting matter and I am so sorry that you were unhappy with our previous responses.

I would firstly like to apologise for any misinformation provided by staff in store, this has been sent to our Regional Management to be addressed internally. I must reiterate we are unfortunately unable to make an appeal on your behalf. This is because all appeals need to be placed in writing directly by the appellant. Doing so allows you to retain your right to formally appeal any decisions made by the car park management company. 

We would always advise any customer to appeal a charge that is received. I can assure you our parking restrictions are not there to penalise genuine loyal customers like yourself and including an image of your receipt along with your appeal will assist in having your charge from Parking Eye overturned. 

In closing I hope this charge is brought to a speedy conclusion and the above assures you of our best intentions at all times. 

Thank you again for contacting us. 

 
Yours sincerely, 
For and on behalf of Lidl Great Britain Limited 

Kim Richmond
Customer Service
For more information on how we process your personal data visit www.lidl.co.uk/privacynotice.
For more information visit our website www.lidl.co.uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Drip...

 

Wonder how far this will "escalate".

 

You're not asking them to appeal, you're demanding that they cancel it.

He's writing as "customer services"...right!

You are THEIR customer. You parked in THEIR car park to shop in THEIR store.

Any parking contract is with THEM.

 

If they say otherwise, next ask for a copy of their contract with the fleecers derogating responsibility?

Edited by Nicky Boy
  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can assure you our parking restrictions are not there to penalise genuine loyal customers like yourself

 

Really?!!

  • Haha 1
  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in the next series of Relentlessly yours e-mails I shall re-iterate the point of customer service, the reluctance of an appeal to P-eye due to their notorious unscrupulous greed etc, details of their contract with the fleecers and perhaps ask for the working e-Mail address of the CEO. 
 

maybe If I’m lucky I will progress to the next stepping block and get a response from a Senior Management member🤔🫣🤯

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another e-mail fired up. 
 

In the meantime, I have also been into the store itself and spoke to the manager who told me very politely that even though historically they were able to cancel these charges, recently they have been disallowed to do so.  
He appeared genuine when he also told me that Lidl’s own staff have incurred these after forgetting to register their new cars as per P-eye rules. They themselves have had to appeal via the same and only route available at the present. He expressed his own dissatisfaction with the process and Management decision to block any help via Lidl staff- who deal with these accounts all the time. 😫😩🤯
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, they could historically cancel the pcn's and are now prevented from doing so on a local basis.

 

This indicates that the pcn's CAN still be cancelled by Lidl. I doubt that their contract with the fleecers has changed.

It's just their own stupid internal policy.

 

So, if your complaint goes high enough, hopefully, they'll eventually do the right thing.

And then the forum will have the contact details for future victims to go straight to the organ grinder.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

They’ve been disallowed to intervene into the process AND to divulge telephone numbers & e-mails of CEO and other senior management bods -hence the reason why those e-mails I sent first came back undeliverable. They obviously have a specific way to recognise those sent out by daring paupers . 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they'll have changed the email addresses.

Evidently, they haven't clicked on to the way to stop having to deal with numerous pcn complaints is simply to get rid of the fleecers,  or change the terms of their contract and force them to allow appeals with proof of purchase...

Edited by Nicky Boy
  • Like 1
  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could well be having a bombardment of emails due to others being invoiced by the egregious parking eye  one hour way too short for a full weekly or monthly shop.

 

As an aside local to me Aldi, different firm same family, has closed for refurbishment, they put some plant machinery in early and vans, Contractor told me they have loads of bother with PE over overstays when doing work on various sites even when vans are whitelisted as authorised.

,

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest e-mail from Lidl Customer Diservice - which they have declared to be the last too since  the case is apparently now closed 😩🤯

 Parking Charge Notice

Thank you for your most recent contact.

As per our previous email we are unable to cancel a parking charge on your behalf. As we do not have access to any Parking Eye records this must be taken up with them directly. 

In regards to contacting our CEO, all contact must be made to the below address. Unfortunately at Customer Services we do not have a phone number or email to provide.

CEO RYAN McDONNELL
Lidl House
14 Kingston Road
Surbiton
KT5 9NU

Please note any correspondence sent to the CEO is dealt with by our customer service management team.

We are now unable to advise further on this issue and consider this case closed at Customer Services. 

Thank you for contacting us.

 

Yours sincerely, 
For and on behalf of Lidl Great Britain Limited 

Kim Richmond
Customer ServiceFor more information on how we process your personal data visit www.lidl.co.uk/privacynotice.
For more information visit our website www.lidl.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the branch manager was telling the truth, and unfortunately the poor people working in customer services can't serve the customer because their boss has told them not to.

 

It won't be any consolation whatsoever to you but your insistence will help others here in the future in clearing up Lidl's obstinate change of policy.

 

Have a look on the local council portal whether planning permission was given for this reduction to one hour (clue - it won't have been) and if the original planning permission for the supermarket was for one hour's free parking (clue - it won't have been).

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You’re right. I am now pretty convinced that Lidl’s management has adopted a blank no- can do response and they will not be forthcoming with an alternative. 
 

I have no problem persevering with this line of enquiry as long as I have some hope of success. Sadly, after reading countless of recent accounts involving Lidl and PEye it doesn’t look very promising.

More and more I read about people appealing to Parkingeye directly with enough evidence and pertinent reasons which ended in PCN cancellations. I know you are not advocating this but if these appeals are carefully worded without revealing the identity of the driver- what is there to lose ? 
I have no intention of paying them a penny. 

 

I forgot to mention that managed to make an E-mail stick to Lidl’s CEO yesterday/ no reply received just yet. 
 

Going back to your suggestion, FTMDave, if  I do manage to find info around the original planning permission to the contrary of the current practice, who would I present that to ? Lidl? Or did you mean as future defence?
Oh, and the free parking  time is 90 minutes. We spent 20 min on top of that -  

 

thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Bon-ee-bon said:

Oh, and the free parking  time is 90 minutes. We spent 20 min on top of that

Interesting.

 

If you look at the second page of the fleecers' invoice it says you exceeded the parking time of "I hour 0 minute".

 

I'm knackered now - will post more tomorrow.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive sorted the pdf in post 1 for you.

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no point in appealing to PE  You did overstay and so have no grounds of appeal.  That's ignoring for a moment the fact that they are utter charlatans who never accept justified appeals either - ever.

 

I mentioned the matter of planning permission just as ammo for further down the line if they were stupid enough to do court.

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest,  I know it's been suggested before,  but is there any mileage in threatening to add Lidl as a 3rd party to any legal action?

Sorry if it's a stupid question, but I'm currently on holiday and had a few drinks...😁

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

So having the shopping receipt corresponding to the exact time on the PCN would not be a good ground for appeal? I know they are not reasonable and are only interested to make money but that is what was used by Others who have been successful in their direct approach to PEye Is it not worth a shot if I can be certain not to divulge  the identity of the driver ? 
 

I’m just playing devil’s advocate here 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can see you haven't read any other threads here about Parking Eye, unless you've done it while not signed in.

 

We know that appealing hardly ever works. I know telling them you have a silver bullet is a logical thing to do but best you get yourself into letter tennis and waste a lot of time or at worst you let slip something that helps PE.

 

HB

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, no- believe me I have, if anything I have exhausted myself by reading not only what is available here but on other platforms such as Moneysavingexpert etc since the 1st day that stupid PCN landed on our doorstep. 

 

I would never enter into a back and fro with them  - I was only wondering about the one off appeal that’s all

Link to post
Share on other sites

you never appeal, and you have to understand other sites are out to give advice that is somewhat false and leads to people being contacted off thread by PM saying i can help for anything from £80-£400

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...