Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've got some suggestions re Bizspace but can you fill in the sticky please.
    • 1 Date of the infringement 14th April 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 17th April 2024 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received 20th April 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? ANPR photos of vehicle in and out (although as they were taken at night they don’t show much). 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up  N 7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Independent Appeals Service POPLA  - BPA Logo is on NTK If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here. N/A Hi, As keeper, I have received a PNC from MET Parking over the vehicle being parked in the infamous Stansted Starbucks/Mcdonald’s car park(s). The vehicle was parked outside Starbucks (at night, when it was closed) and the driver went into Mcdonalds. However, the driver wishes to appeal due to the poor and misleading unlit signage, and believes that this PNC is unfair. I am sure you are aware of this company/car park, and I would appreciate any advice on this matter. Kind regards PNC 14.04.2024.pdf
    • The PCN is one of the more compliant that I have seen. however it still fails. There is no period of parking mentioned as required by paragraph 9[2][a] . ANPR cameras only capture the arrival an departure times. It does not record the times you drove from the entrance to the parking place and then from the parking spot to the exit. That means that if you are the keeper then you are not liable to pay the PCN. Only the driver is so do not appeal as you may reveal who was actually driving.if you were not the keeper then as long as the driver is not identified CE will have difficulty on that fact alone. The majority of people with valid motor insurance are allowed to drive your car  and Courts do not accept tha that the driver and the keeper are the same person. On top of that your car was trespassing there since you didn't have a Permit and only the land owner can pursue you not the monkey they employ. The signage is prohibitory in that only permit holders can park there so no contract can be formed. The signage is new apparently so there must be some time allowance for motorists to adjust to the new signs which could mean that  they shouldn't even be issuing you with a PCN. For all those reasons I wouldn't be too much in a hurry to pay them a penny. And well done on posting up the PCN and that sign so quickly. 
    • Dear CAG Team   Given the above, and not knowing what the actual account name is, I will haver to stick with that same name but the Bailiff said that once the variation is done there wont be an issue getting the money off him. What i cannot get my head around is when i set up a new payee, if the name doesn't match the account name my bank wont allow the transfer. So how is it that it authorised and allowed the transfer? Also, given the dealer broike trading standard rules and tried to sell me a death trap, then keep my deposit, why is his bank and mine protecting him by not disclosing his account name or at least making a charge back as i first attempted?   Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Emirates HaD Bank (P.J.S.C)/IDR Legal ltd - statutory demand


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

NO do NOT use those fleecers on that certain website!!

they are in bed with most of the banks and scam you blind!!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an outstanding UAE bank loan and credit card debts and am not in a position to settle these. I have been sent chasers by IDR via email and post. What are my options?

Does anyone have any experience of using the well known debt negotiating agency that is often in the news and seem to specialize in UAE debt matters? 

 

Also, how can I check if I can travel abroad as I am told that the UAE banks are notorious for using Interpol to classify debt as fraud and having them issue Red Notices.

 

Thanks.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please dont get conned by those websites, all they do is cost you money and are in bed with the banks.

 

And we've not seen these interpol issues in many years.you are reading old stuff designed to frighten you and gander these fleecers money..dont!!

 

have you written to the bank updating them with your correct address?

you should do.

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX.

 

Yes, it definitely is scary to read that Interpol is used as a debt collection agency by the UAE. I have asked other law firms about what my options were in order to check with Interpol for Red notices issued but they are charging exorbitant fees. 

 

I have not been in contact with the banks as I did not want to get harassed by them due to an inability to pay. 

 

Also considered going down the bankruptcy route but not sure if that can be applied to UAE debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok listen

youve got almost everything thinking wise wrong.

forget about red notices

forget about going bk

forget about using scamming solicitors.

 

you simply inform the original creditors of your correct and correct address.

 

you ignore the silly debt collectors and their solicitor mates.

until or unless your ever get

a letter of claim

a statutory demand (but that could be fake)

or a court stamped claimform

 

nothing they can ever really do. A dca is not a BAILIFF

and only the original banks can do court etc.

 

there are 100's of uae threads here.

i suggest you get up to current speed and read them.

 

stop panicking and read crap websites and forums

stick to cag only.

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to UAE Debt being Chased by IRDWW in UK

Yes they could make you bankrupt through UK Courts.

 

So yes you will need to apply to set aside the statutory demand.  If you fail to do so, the next step is that the could petition for your bankruptcy.

 

Can you upload a copy of the statutory demand in PDF format ?  ( But please remove any personal information )

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UAE Debt being Chased by IRDWW in UK - now statutory demand

And go read the other UAE statutory demand SD threads in this foreign debt forum 

 

Some are just a threat and they don't actually move it forward, anyone can download the form and send it. Don't forget no court is involved at all or know about it if they don't 

 

Go read the threads.

 

Dx 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But it can happen so be careful....

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Emirates HaD Bank (P.J.S.C)/IDR Legal ltd - statutory demand

I have spoken to a lawyer who only had experience pf dealing with debt from the Caribbean. He said I should write to the DCA offering any payment terms I can afford.

 

When I raised concerns about this course of action he suggested that I should also write to the bank offering terms as he believes I cannot have the SD set aside.


I have read through the various threads and nothing mentions what defence I should use in this case as there is no court case in the UAE that I am aware of - and no notice has been sent to me.

 

Is there any defence that I can use in terms of how the loan was obtained - a guy turned up from the bank at my place of work and got me to sign a number of documents. Is there a case of mis-selling of PPI, or that the loan was insured in case of redundancies, as I was told?


I kept paying the loan off even after losing my job until the point I did not have any more funds left and had to leave the UAE or they would have first barred ne from leaving the country and then convicting me of a criminal offence. I tried to negotiate with the banks when I was there but that obviously was to no avail.


I have a few days left to submit a response to the SD, have started to fill out the IAA application but am still unsure of what route to take.

   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you have provided a number of reasons to set aside the SD in your last post.

 

No UAE Court judgement

 

No opportunity to address issues with the debt. The original creditor when providing the loan advised that there would be Insurance provided, that would enable the creditor to receive repayments due, if the loan account holder was made redundant.  The original creditor has not to your knowledge made  a claim against the Insurance.

 

Remember that although you may owe a debt, this does not mean you should be made bankrupt in order for the creditor to receive payment. 

 

If you raise issues, which a Judge decides needs to be addressed, the process would be stopped.  By not setting aside the SD opens yourself up to being petitioned for Bankruptcy.

 

If you start making small offers of repayment, the creditor could decide the offer is not enough and proceed with your Bankruptcy anyway.  So would have thought you would first of all attempt to set aside the SD.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF they ever do send the form to the court...

could be a bluff.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

and?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...