Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted.
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell PAPLOC now Claimform - old E-ON £3K+ bill


autumn53

Recommended Posts

Okay. Are you prepared to sue them for distress caused by the breach of the data protection act?

He would see the money for about £100 simply to get them moving on this. And to attract their attention

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your patience with me. I have been reading the posts here about the process.

 

Yes I will talk to my husband when he comes home and see how he feels about proceeding. Thank you so much for your time and prompt help. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi my husband has chickened out. He says he will pay-up. Says he'll work harder and set aside a monthly sum if EoN agrees. He is like that. Towing the line. 

 

Please forgive us for being compliant and meek. We have never done this before, taking on a giant firm like this. Only claimed PPI with Barclays once long ago when we were young with a lot of help by kind people here. But back then we just raised the SAR followed by a letter requesting refund and the money came to the account a few weeks later.

 

Will it be worth a try to request Eon to lower the amount and allowing us a monthly direct debit?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry. I understand .

You may as well keep on hassling for the disclosure of the SAR .

Why don't you send them a letter and point out their error and the fact that you are still waiting for the disclosure and that they are in breach of statutory duty.

 

You could also complaint to the ICO

 

 

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

going all the way back to post 1

 

surely they cant its against back billing rules.

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is depressing to see Eon getting away with this robbery and hubris. I will talk to my husband again as I cannot watch him burn himself out to pay these people. Meanwhile, I have been staying up a lot,  very anxious wide awake up until the morning. Always a constant undercurrent of this debt's fear.

 

I think suing them for not responding to my husband's SAR will be a good start. Unfortunately, I have only the digital copy of his SAR and no proof of postage. I do have the receipt for my Royal Mail Recorded Delivery for that Reminder we sent.

 

The Small Claim process itself seems very simple and smooth from what I gathered reading up here.

1. We need to write a Letter Before Action giving 14 days to Eon to which they may or may not make a counter claim.

2. Following this we will need to prepare a Claim Form and pay the fees. I hope this is up-to-date. I may have misunderstood though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - that's right

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have somewhat got my husband to give me a green signal to start the process.

 

Should I start with directly complaining to the ICO about EON not responding to the SAR? I assume an LBA is not required at this stage.

 

I am meanwhile gathering all my paperwork noting all events so far including details that may be needed from time to time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In view of the stress that this is causing you, it may well be an idea to complain directly to the ICO and if eventually you can get a view from them that Eon have "probably" breached their obligations, then this will be enough to set off litigating with confidence.

It may also move them to produce there disclosure. However, given the pain they have caused you if you do get that opinion from the ICO then some damages for the distress will be almost automatic and I would suggest that you go ahead and begin litigation.

It will be easy, quick, you can do it with confidence – and it will encourage you if you have to follow the same route with them or anybody else again.

However let's cross that bridge when we come to it 

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a bunch for your reply.

 

I have filled the Personal Information Complaints Form I got from here. Thanks for this too.

 

Please, I have a few questions.

1. Can I be acting on behalf of my husband in the complaint to ICO? One of the fields in the form allows that.

2. Will the above need a letter from him and can this all be done online.

3.  I have no supporting evidence of having sent his SAR to satisfy one of the fields in the form.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am attaching this letter with the form that I will submit today online to ICO. Please could you see if I have mentioned something that may weaken my position. 


 

Quote

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

May I politely bring to your notice that E-ON Energy have failed to respond to my Subject Access Request dated 17th January 2022 and subsequently to my reminder letter about the same dated 23rd February 2022. The former was sent via Royal Mail Signed For service and latter using Royal Mail Recorded Delivery Service.

 

Kindly note that both my wife and I have been deeply concerned about a large bill E.ON Energy posted to us in the month of December. This bill belongs to a closed account number xxxxx for a shared (with a large chicken farm next doors) electric meter and is to the tune of £3277.28

 

I paid for this shared meter’s usage via monthly Direct Debit to E.ON Energy and have no information on the other user. I later transferred this account in my wife’s name when a monthly Direct Debit was set in her name in 2020.

 

This shared electric meter no longer supplied us electricity since a separate new meter was installed on our own property on 28th July 2020. At this point E-ON closed account number xxxx and started us on a fresh account tied to our own meter unique to us.

 

Several stressful phone calls later E.ON Energy continues to remind us of this debt via text and email, mentioning late fees, to which we strongly feel they need to check their records. No amount of politeness and patience from our side seems to resolve this matter. To add to this, I am unsure if they can present a bill to me in 2022 for an account that has been closed since 2020.

 

We are a middle aged couple with health related concerns and are finding it increasingly difficult to cope with this breech of peace even after having never missed or delayed a payment to E.ON.

 

We feel it is our right to have all documentation they hold pertaining to us such that we are able to look into the reason for this disproportionate amount. They have supplied my wife with her details upon her SAR to them, but have failed to do the same for me. Please may I also clarify that both, my wife and I have held the said account with E.ON at different times as stated above.

 

I also hereby allow my wife Mrs. xxxx to deal with all communications with all concerned parties in the above matter.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't looked at it all yet – but I can tell you that my first impression is that it is far too long and you are going into all sorts of personal detail which is totally irrelevant.
It needs to be completely factual and relate simply to the breach of statutory duty

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you won't feel too demoralised but I have crossed out all the information which I think is irrelevant – and I'm afraid that is the bulk of your letter.

I think what is relevant is the reminders that you have sent them, copies of the subject access request and any other messages that you have sent them relating to your request.
Their duplicate disclosure to you of material in place of the statutory disclosure that they should have made.

One thing you have to realise is that these people who work in the ICO – like most other offices of this kind, want to get through their correspondence quickly. They don't want have to do a triage of stuff which is relevant – and the rest which simply amounts to a rehearsal of the substantive problem that you are having with Eon.

The fact that Eon may be overcharging you, is not a problem of the ICO at the moment – although later on if you manage to establish the truth of it, then we will have a new complaint against them to the ICO for inaccurate data processing.
However, you aren't there yet

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if that is the correct email and maybe it is a good idea to telephone them .

Important thing is to get a reference number .

I'm afraid that GDPR has been a failure to the extent that it has created a huge amount of extra work for the ICO because companies now are so aware, but it hasn't been accompanied by resources .

 

 

You used to be able to make a complaint to the ICO and you would get a reply within about 10 days or 2 weeks.

 

Now. It can take months and only if you are on the case

 

 

 

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just on the phone with them as suggested by you. They had not received my mail and I was asked to fill their online form here. Got auto email from them once I submitted the online form, although this does not have any reference number. Hopefully, they will send me one soon. I think I can see how the Data Protection laws can generate a flood of enquiries for the ICO.

 

Thanks very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you respond to them and tell them that the amount they are seeking is in dispute, that they are in breach of their statutory duty to provide you with your data and that a complaint has been made to the ICO under reference number XXX.

It won't make any difference – but at least you have a paper trail and you can show that they have been put on notice.

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Should it also be time to mention the back billing rule might well play a part too now?  Or could that be seen as partial admittance to some owed  figure exists..??

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for looking into this.

 

I have written this and am planning to send this via EMail to EON.

 

Quote

 

To

E. ON Energy

 

Closed Account number  000000000

 

May I please bring to your notice that I have been receiving email and text reminders for a bill that is currently under dispute the closed account number 0000000

 

May I add to this that my husband Mr xxxxx, who I act on behalf of also held this account for a certain period of time initially and was paying for the bills via Direct Debit to you. He awaits your response to a full Subject Access Request that he sent to you via Royal Mail on 14th of January 2022 followed by a reminder for the same on 18th February 2022 to which there has been no response from your end and a formal complaint has been raised with the Information Commissioner’s Office under the current Data Protection Act.

 

Please note that the said account was linked to a shared electric meter between our property and a large neighbouring farm building. My husband Mr xxxxx and I paid for this shared meter’s bills presented by you to us via monthly Direct Debit to E.ON Energy and have no information on the other user. May I also mention that this disputed bill has the neighbouring Farm’s address not mine. This suggests that there is some discrepancy in your records.

 

Please note that our address is

Our House

ABC 

Post Code xxxx xxxx

 

NOT

 

Chicken Farm

XYZ

Post Code xxxx xxxx

 

The above is the neighbouring building’s address. This is the address that the disputed bill mentions as mine with my name on top. This indicates that your records are not up to date.

 

No amount of politeness and patience from our side seems to resolve this matter. To add to this, I am unsure if you can present any bill to me in 2022 for an account that has been closed since mid 2020. It would be termed as back billing and is certainly a financial malpractice if not prohibited by the Law.

 

We are a middle aged couple with health related concerns and are finding it increasingly difficult to cope with this constant breech of peace even after having never missed or delayed a payment to E.ON Energy. Keeping in view the address on this bill is that of our neighbour with my name on top.

 

We feel it is our right to have all documentation you hold pertaining to us. You have supplied me with my details upon my Subject Access Request, but have failed to do the same for my husband Mr xxxxx who I represent (permission attached).

Thanking You

 

 

 

I hope my wording doesn't admit owing anything to EON.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but if you want anyone to understand that, least of all EON who seemed confused enough to date, thats totally unintelligible as to what you are trying to explain.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@autumn53  -  you haven't explained what period this disputed bill is meant to cover.  You've successfully posted the front of the bill twice, but you haven't shown the reverse where there ought to be an explanation of how they have arrived at the billed amount - and what period it covers.  How is the amount broken down?  As others have said, they shouldn't go back further than 12 months unless you have been obstructive or uncooperative in providing readings or have prevented readings.  Doesn't sound as if you have been.

 

And, presumably, although the disputed bill shows "the chicken farm's" address, it also has your name or your husband's name on it?

 

When you bought the house back in December 2018, did neither your surveyor nor your conveyancing solicitor draw your attention to the lack of a meter on the property and the potential problems this might cause?  (It's nearly 30 years since I was last involved in buying a house so I'm a bit hazy on the details but I'd have expected this to have been highlighted at the time).

 

After you moved in and set up a DD with E-on, did you not think to provide a meter reading to E-on, and when you couldn't access the meter in "the chicken farm", didn't you think to address the problem at the time?  Presumably E-on were unable to access* the meter too?  And before setting up your own account and DD you just paid "random" bills as they turned up?

 

And after over three years you still don't know who owns the property next door where the meter that originally supplied your property is situated?

 

Apologies if I sound critical - I don't mean to be.  I'm just trying to understand what has happened and how it could have happened.  And what steps you have or have not already taken to resolve this.

 

Ignoring the back-billing issue for the moment, if the bill is based on a correct* meter reading (and that may be a big "if") then I'd have thought it more likely that the debt is owed by the owners of the "chicken farm", unless your own electricity consumption is exceptionally high**.  Who else but the owners of the chicken form would have been consuming electricity via that meter before you?  (Who occupied your house before you?)

 

*If the disputed bill is based on a correct meer reading, it sort of raises the question how E-on got access to the meter.  Has the original meter been replaced with a smart meter at some stage?

 

** Is your electricity consumption ridiculously high?

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...