Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

P2P Loan CCJ - claimant now has 3rd party order freezing my account - help


HP Mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You were told to open another account. you said you had no money to bother doing that...but you suddenly transfer £500 into it..to pay essentials??

 

Stop funding bank accounts that they can grab cash from!!

you caused this yourself... Sorry.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Dx - I had set up another account. 

 

My benefits don't cover even my essentials. 

I took advice from my pension advisor, he checked and said I had 1k available in pension fund - which was a wonderful surprise and bonus.   They organized that sum to go from the pension fund into the new account. 

 

The 500 I transferred into my normal account was the last of the 1k.  That's it - I have nothing else that can be taken from that pension fund. 

 

You may well be criticizing me but that's harsh.  I had direct debits still set up in my normal account - and that's why I transferred 500. 

I have direct debits due tomorrow - one of which is a higher quarterly payment - total debit value of 500. 

My next benefit isn't due for 1w. 

 

now I can't pay the direct debits and I have 0 for food. 

 

I am stressed and in a corner and probably not thinking right. 

Clearly I made a mistake by transferring my last 500. But "shouting" at me isnt gonna change my mistake. 

 

 I'm trying to keep calm.  

 

I have been doing my best to rise above the most awful circumstances over the last few years. I try not to dwell as a victim, I prefer to try find solutions.  To that end I cope. But most people in similar situation would not have survived the last few years. 

 

In my previous business existence I could earn £500 in a day.  That existence disappeared.  To now lose £500 feels like the end of the world.   I have budgeted.  But I did not expect my circumstances to still be unresolved after a few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you'd dealt with moving the DD's too then the court would not of gotten the money.

turn any A/C that any court can seize money from into a dead account no DD's no income no movement.

pers i would have though with 'all that has gone on over the years' you'd have been a master at this game and told us a few things to help others....

 

think before you drink before you drive.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx - u r correct. I should have but didn't. I am stupid.  I will now.

And I do intend to write it all down/ self-publish.

I do also try to help family and friends with stuff I've picked up - which is evident on some of my postings - and helps distract from my own issues

 

I still need to understand the implications of this order and what may come next?

Edited by HP Mum
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to contact whoever has obtained this money from the Bank, to ask for it back for the reasons you have given and if they won't repay this to you,  apply to the court to retreive this money.   Due to your finances, it should not cost you any hearing fee.  The Court staff may help you with this. 

 

The advice from your pensions advisor appears lacking, if they were aware of the situation you had with creditors.  Did they warn you, that as soon as the money was released, you might have to disclose this to creditors that had a Court judgement against you ?

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an interim tpdo and the county court is holding the £s before the tpdo is made final...  

The bank is at fault for releasing funds from kids account. I can't discuss with them until tomorrow morning.  Will see what they say before I contact court.

 

Not really sure the pension guy did anything wrong?  In the sense the ccj is secured against an asset from which no £s will be released until different legal disputes are resolved/ asset sold?  The pension tax-free £s were sent to a different bank than the tpdo bank.   

 

I'm not really sure how a ccj works?  The debt is secured against a property.   With just benefits and this small pension sum into a different bank account - which was supposed to just pay essential life bills -  surely the ccj debt is "safe".

 

To whom should I declare I received 1k?   Those funds are gone now anyway. I don't have any other funds or assets from which any creditor can grab

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

the bank are not at fault if your name is/has overall authority on any other A/C.

many financial scammers hid money that way and thats why, oh's it's my underage kids savings/trustee account for when they are of xxx age. i'll hide it there.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:noidea: trouble is the cost of doing so.

 

as explained above you might get fee relief but even so any hearing would be months away.

always better to proactive before rather than try and be reactive after.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 But...

it is actually the banks fault with this account.  They can see its not mine and had kid's income in. We just left the account as it was, rather than transferring it into a new account thinking it would be safer and without thinking there'd be a problem like this.  Also kid is officially an adult now.  

 

What do u mean - the cost of doing so?  My kid wants his £s back ! Kid can't be held liable for my debts

Edited by HP Mum
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi I am not expert but it feels that you have ignored the claimant letters and claims. If you had negotiated with them they would give you the chance to negotiate a minimum amount to pay each month. This has lead to the claimant becoming very annoyed and making court orders to verify your financial situation.

 

These companies only spend money if there are money to make therefore they have proves that you have assets they can claim on. at this stage is up to the judge decision when your case goes to court based on the claimant request.

 

suggest you try to arrange monthly payment to repay the debts. If the amount you owe is more than 5 thousands they will bankrupt you and take your assets whether in dispute or not, your claimant will be patient they have done their search on your assets. If you go to court very likely you loose and have to pay costs thousands!!

 

best to make contact with the claimant and negotiate. Judges are never emotional about people that ignores their responsibilities.

 

hope I have not upset but there is no way out but negotiate.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

They can't currently take the asset as the asset is protected due to separate legal disputes involving other entities.   I am not sure if they know this.

 

Also the amount owed is a lot.

But they are the 2nd charge - which is large mortgage size

 

Edited by HP Mum
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a house or any property on your name they already know, there is a search system through the land registry. if the claimant does not know you will be questioned by the judge in court and you have to be honest or face prison if you lie and hide assets. Do not take courts and judges lightly. I hope all goes well for you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They know about the asset.  They got a ccj and secured it against the asset.

What they don't know is that the asset is subject to separate disputes.

I also did ask a lawyer to deal with this tpdo but they didn't do the work and won't if I have no funds !

Edited by HP Mum
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HP Mum said:

Also kid is officially an adult now.  

makes no odds. they were not when you set it up. you have an authoritative, i bet you still have  control over that money if you did not change the people with hold on it. , that means it can be sequestrated. (opps that's scotland - lucky you are not there you'd stand no chance they would take it by court order).

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you say dx. Banks dictate that kids accounts are set up with a parent name.  In my kids case there was proper paid work.  That's evident by the companies paying into the account in kids name.

The funds belong to the kid

It is interesting that a different bank wrote to nominated parent to advise they were changing the account into an adult account for the kid- yet this bank didnt 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your woes have been going on for years.

You owe monies you can't repay. Your income is minimal (benefits).

 

Do you think that if (years ago!) you'd declared bankruptcy (especially if one of your creditors had paid for it!), you'd now be free of debt, free of the CCJ and able to move forward?

 

Have you sought debt advice, (including bankruptcy) rather than fighting repeated court actions / acquiring ccj(s)?.

 

Bankruptcy isn't the right way forward for everyone, but isn't the shame that it was once viewed with. For some scenarios it is the best option and allows people a fresh start.

Is there a reason why it wouldn't be an option for you (historically, or currently) to free you from the fear of further court action(s)?.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there is a good reason.

It's very complicated; too much to go into here. I haven't been able to talk about what's going on.  Not even to close friends. 

 

A bare bones explanation is that I am stuck in a protracted 3 way battle involving one asset. Me going bk would adversely affect that.

 

I have successfully fought bk so far on the grounds that someone else's actions have paralyzed all of us. 

The last few years have been brutal. 

 

All the issues to be dealt with are very time-consuming. That - plus lockdown - has prevented earning ability.  But there will be a resolution.  Then I really hope my life can return to normal and I can earn decent money again.  In the meantime I am living off (less than) the bare minimum...

Once the battle is resolved I hope that the person that has issued the tpdo can get their £s.  And others too...

 

I need to face up to this tpdo and get the £s that aren't mine returned.  There's a hearing coming up and I would like to know if I can email the courts with my evidence as I can't attend.  Is that possible?   

 

I know its possible to email docs regarding a claim for a judge to review - and I have that email as I've used it before.  But I just don't know if it's possible to email docs to the court for a specific hearing instead of attendance? 

 

 

 

 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some good news.

 

attendance today as L-in-P was scary but beneficial.

Most £s returned, no need for 244 form due to high cost,

have to provide further evidence and doc of truth within 1w to prove level of 'broke-ness' to get tpdo discharged (or be guilty of contempt ☹️ ).

 

Not 100% sure the extent of what is needed??  

 

The tpdo was only for 1 bank.  Yet some transfers came from my parachute bank account - which would be shown in statements. 

Would I / should I show the parachute account now too?   

 

Money in that account was/is (and hopefully will be in the future) occasional cheque gifts from family to help out and was the account into which pension funds got paid.  There's only a small amount left in this account - and still £s that I would use for normal living expenses..  

 

Alternatively would all certified info from hmrc -  benefit, covid grants, pension and tax return - be enough as evidence of all the income received over the last tax year?   Benefits I continue to get monthly.  Seiss and pension £s all been used up.

 

Silly - sols costs are going to be more than are ever recoverable via the tpdo.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

surely the payments from the parachute account when totalled are far far smaller than compared to the individual totals from the other funding sources?

i cant really see how anyone would ever go thru things in such finest details if they were so small and be really bothered about them?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what they are trying to achieve? Even judge was at wits end considering the bulk was returned and there's a CO - which they didn't disclose in their claim. 

 

Unless they hope to find links to other accounts with lots of money?  Which there isn't. 

 

Tbh i don't think they expected me to turn up and dispute it. The attending Sol was very unprepared and didn't seem to know any details

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My court 1st in person/ statement and 2nd written evidence response to the tpdo claim was that the taken funds are needed for essential living costs.

 

Despite the court agreeing the bulk taken could be returned immediately (£s that weren't mine) the court has still not sent the written authority to the bank to release those funds.  The bank needs the Order and the Judge hasn't written it.

 

Despite claiming hardship and stating the other remaining funds are essential for life - a call to the Courts advised it could take 2w+ for judge to write up Order to return the £s - or not.  And a call to the bank said it could take 2-4w+ for them to release the funds - due to the time it could take for clerks to process the paperwork. Mad.

 

The Judge had suggested in court I use the funds they'd agreed to return to pay for the n244 app form for hardship to submit the further evidence within 2w.  Thankfully Judge waived using the form - or wouldn't have even been able to submit further hardship evidence - due to not enough funds in account.

 

What madness. The judge didn't understand the reimbursement process could take up to 6w.  And what a farce - that a defendant stating they are broke and in dire need of the taken funds to survive, then is made to wait for weeks and weeks...

 

As an aside - is it correct to assume that the further evidence submitted to prove hardship - i.e. bank statements and hmrc returns - is strictly confidential to the judge and to the claimant lawyers re that claim?  That due to GDPR the lawyers cannot disclose the submitted confidential docs to anyone else/ any other company?

 

Edited by HP Mum
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...