Jump to content


OPS ANPR PCN Claimform - 17mins stay - VANTAGE POINT, BRIGHTON, BN1 4GW,


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

might be better to obscure the QR code boxes and that ref number by them too.

 

ZZPS can't instruct anyone to do anything as HB points out. and anyway it's just zzps using QDR letterhead in the same printer as the last one came from.

 

don't forget you should be also self helping by reading up a few 100 threads in this same forum in the down times, so you know when and how to react as the next steps unfold.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Open

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello folks,

Its been a while since any comms on this topic and I was wondering if we might have seen the last of it but maybe they just had the summer off or had been struck down by Covid ?

 

 I attach 2 files showing what appear to be the same ‘Final Demand’ letter, I posted about receipt of the first one back in May but didn’t attach a copy of the letter.

 

See the other file which as I said ,looks to be the exact same letter but 6 months after the first, They got the issue date wrong on the first letter and seem to have changed that on this latest letter.

 

I know the advice is still not to react in any way but is this normal that after already sending the original letter and then following up with multiple ZZPS and QDR letters and escalating costs claims that they circle back around to the beginning of the process?? Has this approach been seen before

 

Thanks in advance and keep up the good work

 

2021-05-24 OPS Final Demand.pdf 2021-10-28 OPS Final Demand.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
name removed in PDF
Link to post
Share on other sites

I see they quote two different dates for the issue of the PCN, 14.04.21 & 22.04.21.

 

That's probably just incompetence as they have the intelligence of a brain-damaged amoeba, but just to be sure, you only stopped there once and they've only been pursuing you for one ticket, right?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI FTM Dave,

Thanks for your comment and scrutiny, Yes only 1 ticket in question

- I parked on double yellows or a bus stop if I ever need to go to the bike shop again

 

- So much for trying to do the right thing as I did on the occasion that led to this issue

- the PCN number on both letters is the same and consistent with all other correspondence,

 

The date on the earliest letter-  14th was the date of the event and the 22nd is the date they sent the original NTK

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes everytime.

 

Don't ignore LOC.

 

Don't move without informing them . They have 6yrs

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simplest explanation I think is that they are idiots.  They've probably messed up some dates so have sent the same letter again.

 

The important thing is these letters are not Letters of Claim so can be ignored.

 

As dx says, come back here if they ever have the gonads to send a LoC as that is when you need to reply.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Further correspondence on this matter, 2 letters from DCBL who say they have been instructed to collect the charge. So its gone from OPS to QDR to ZZPS, back to OPS and now to DCBL?? Are they just letterheads spat out from the same printer and overall company ? 

 

2021-11-19 DCBL DCA.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 09/11/2021 at 13:07, FTMDave said:

The simplest explanation I think is that they are idiots.  They've probably messed up some dates so have sent the same letter again.

 

The important thing is these letters are not Letters of Claim so can be ignored.

 

As dx says, come back here if they ever have the gonads to send a LoC as that is when you need to reply.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pop back and look at how i have now renamed your old pdfs now.

try and use that idea date then who and what it says.

 

Until you get a letter of claim you are safe to ignore

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hidden both

 

you also have a habit of you keep leaving you name showing???:frusty:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hello, I Received another letter today from DCBL titled 'Notice of intended legal action' Should I take this as the equivalent of a LBA or LBC and prepare a snotty letter first line of response or maintain silence??

 

It states "we have now referred the matter to our client to review commencing legal action"

 

I'll upload it in the next days but compared to the LBC I received for another case , it doesn't indicate that I need to respond within 30 days or include a response pack with how to pay etc. The other case is with Parking eye and I assume not all companies take the same approach

 

Appreciate your valued advice/ guidance

Link to post
Share on other sites

youd have a reply pack if it were a PAPLOC

ignore

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for your replies guys, Much appreciated and kicks it down the road a but further.

I think it was the way they titled the letter that made me doubt myself.

 

I imagine many others have lost their bottle at this stage and paid up which is why they keep on with the harassment tactics! I've lost count of how any letters I've received from various parties regarding this issue and just when I think they've given up another one lands on the door mat,

 

I hope it follows the same pattern as you have experienced Zydeco and these companies cease their parasitic activities!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...