Jump to content

zydeco

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by zydeco

  1. @dx100uk the land either side and behind the pub is airport land but the land the pub, carpark and beer garden occupies is owned by Robinson brewery. Unfortunately no bylaws,
  2. Hmm, that contract states it is for a fixed period of 36months starting 1st May 2012. Isn't this claim for an incident after May 2015?
  3. This might be of interest. https://confidentials.com/manchester/the-manchester-car-park-disgrace-with-expensive-ramifications-for-the-city
  4. Oh, doesn't that part of your lease (pic 2) make you a member of the management. company? Order UKPC to back off.
  5. But you have a paper trail, they have refused to consider your appeal and already passed it on to DRiP. Also, where did the NTK only give you 14 days to appeal? UKPC are BPA members who give 28 days.
  6. If you look at the bottom of that letter you'll see it says zenith is drp wearing a different skirt. Ignore, ignore and then ignore some more.
  7. The first line reads, "We have been instructed by ZZPS..." so its just another threatogram, Ignore.
  8. So you told unethical no keeper liability, drp tried it on for £136 then Gladys tried for £160 and you told them where to go. 2 years later drp have a memory lapse and get their cross dressing office person to send a zzps letter asking for £130. What a tangled web they try to weave. I've been ignoring drp for about 2 years so do the same.
  9. You need to take that image down quick, you've left all your personal details on it. Plus dont say "I" say "the driver"
  10. If the charge was for leaving the site, parking on southgate park then going to Mcds it can't be anpr. Must be attendant with camera. "Failure to mitigate" attendant should have warned you. Also "you will be required to pay the full amount" nope, popla only binding on the ppc.
  11. So here we are just about the 2nd anniversary of this thread and nothing been heard since the Dr+ letter. My co. still don't understand the difference between LA penalty and ppc invoice so keep the paperwork for 4 more yrs, happy days
  12. Have you got a pic showing the windscreen ticket? Just to compare the pics when the ntk arrives. Should be interesting to see how they avoided your BB.
  13. Well, I don't know how important this might be but the postcode on the NTK is nowhere near the sports centre unless you like a long walk before and after training. Heritage Gate seems to be the name of the housing development not a street name. Street view doesn't show any parking signs at all except some parking bays individually marked as 'visitor parking' but no restriction signs.
  14. This really feels like one of those places where the tail wags the dog. Would be interesting to see what the other businesses say about parking. If you spend 2hrs in the gym then you're not allowed to visit any other business on the site because the ppc says so?
  15. Not a fine and not a penalty. If you appealed the ntk within 28 days of receiving it then they're talking BS. Also another case regarding a wheel touching the white line was thrown out when the judge ruled that the line was part of the bay. Sorry can't remember the details.
  16. Well done for the win but where does a judge come from saying there is no conflict of interest? Hey! I can have 2 jobs, poacher and gamekeeper
  17. Wrote a long answer to this and lost it but anyway, 1) NTK is out of time to create keeper liability so tell them to do one (no need to be polite) 2) CEL don't use pofa so no keeper liability anyway 3) they use "balance of probabilities" that the keeper was the driver. Tough, that fails in court every time, they have to prove they know who the driver was. ( clue: they can't) Don't shops shut at 4pm on Sundays? So what's the parking problem after this time? D Oh and don't forget to complain to every shop you visited about why you're being penalised for shopping at their business, is won't be going there again.
  18. As DX says wait for ntk but if you can go back and take pics of the signs especially at the entrance and where the vehicle was parked the experts can pick them apart.
  19. Congratulations, you now have the 3 template letter set from dr+ so now you can ignore even more.
  20. Wait for the experts, but did the judge really say he would allow a solicitors aid to speak as a lay representative without the claimant being present??
  21. Are you saying that you received NTK on 20th Aug. Relating to a parking event on 22 June? If so this should relate to a windscreen ticket and I think that makes it out of time for windscreen and definitely out of time for anpr. More info needed from the link.
  22. HCEO = high court enforcement officer as seen in "can't pay, we'll take it away" Ask yourself, if they've got a ccj for £264 why would they settle for 150? Perhaps they're worried that a set aside would cost them when they loose? (Also the £114 that's left might turn up in a debt buyers portfolio)
×
×
  • Create New...